Satellite Navigation - Computerphile

Satellite Navigation - Computerphile

Computerphile

7 лет назад

85,811 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@iTube4U
@iTube4U - 21.07.2023 15:13

satelites travel at 22,000 km away ? lower than an airliner ?

Ответить
@akmalmaksumov9738
@akmalmaksumov9738 - 29.04.2022 11:24

bad explanation, disappointed

Ответить
@anonymousme2508
@anonymousme2508 - 01.11.2021 22:05

i looked this video up thinking he was steve wozniak

Ответить
@mattmanhero2375
@mattmanhero2375 - 11.10.2021 07:47

Cool video. I think that 5 years later this topic could definitely be revisited as there is enough content to easily fill a 10-15 minute video. The video did a decent job of illustrating how position is found through the intersecting of signals but time and it's dilation could definitely be covered in more depth.

Ответить
@SamuelWilliams8
@SamuelWilliams8 - 08.09.2020 08:46

I didn't know Steve Wozniak had a British accent...

Ответить
@crankcuffin1948
@crankcuffin1948 - 24.05.2019 21:51

Everything this guy said was a lie

Ответить
@luapluapluap1000
@luapluapluap1000 - 10.01.2018 10:31

yes i feel a 2nd part to this explaination could be helpful.

Ответить
@daggawagga
@daggawagga - 11.01.2017 07:47

I think when you try to detect the position of something in Eve Online you use a very similar technique.

Ответить
@MovingThePicture
@MovingThePicture - 04.01.2017 23:44

50Hz refresh rate?
I've never seen a GPS Receiver refreshing that fast

Ответить
@WilliamLangbehn
@WilliamLangbehn - 04.01.2017 01:26

1 wrong they orbit at i believe mid orbit and that is exactly 2300 miles
2 the clocks are called stratum 1, 2 or 3.


if you have genuine questions about satellites shoot me a mssg, as long as i am allowed to give you the information you want i will tell you what your looking for

Ответить
@artifactingreality
@artifactingreality - 30.12.2016 17:15

You didn't explain what is done with the timecodes that are received. How are they compared. What is the point of them. The way you explained it, just sounded like radio triangulation which ould be done with any signal.

Ответить
@MrFloris
@MrFloris - 30.10.2016 09:16

1080@50 xD. 50?

Ответить
@CommentAuto
@CommentAuto - 29.10.2016 06:44

This channel is just fantastic, please keep up the good work.

I presume there must be another video about sat nav errors, could you please share the link.

Ответить
@rickr530
@rickr530 - 06.10.2016 11:59

I came here to learn about celestial navigation of satellites but the talk is about terrestrial navigation with GPS :(

Ответить
@Tordah123
@Tordah123 - 29.09.2016 06:19

But the earth isn't flat? computerphile iluminati confirmed.

Ответить
@taschke1221
@taschke1221 - 24.09.2016 04:19

I thought I was watching this to learn something new but it was only explained in cliché laymen's terms.

Ответить
@noredine
@noredine - 23.09.2016 21:51

Who else here live on a balloon ?

Ответить
@parasdsingh
@parasdsingh - 23.09.2016 12:01

Need more context on what he's actually talking about. Would appreciate some equations or how exactly the time precisions produces a location

Ответить
@limitless1692
@limitless1692 - 23.09.2016 02:12

i think GPS is the best invention ever :)

Ответить
@Thezuule1
@Thezuule1 - 23.09.2016 01:14

Surprised you didn't expound on the affect of time dilation on the satellites. I always thought that was the most interesting part of the system.

Ответить
@175griffin
@175griffin - 22.09.2016 23:28

I thought this was going to be about how satellites navegate

Ответить
@barnstormer322
@barnstormer322 - 22.09.2016 22:27

feeling slightly dissatisfied with this video - feel like it could have been explained clearer and in more depth :/

Ответить
@Kronimiciad
@Kronimiciad - 22.09.2016 17:48

Must admit, I'm disappointed that the need to account for time dilation wasn't mentioned.

Ответить
@alhdlakhfdqw
@alhdlakhfdqw - 22.09.2016 17:27

the guy doesnt explain nicely like others! :(

Ответить
@larsfroelich
@larsfroelich - 22.09.2016 11:30

so how does one "connect" to a sattelite?

Ответить
@EtzEchad
@EtzEchad - 22.09.2016 10:42

Incorrect explanation. The fourth satellite is not used to determine which of the two points in space you are at, it is used (as you said later in the vid) to determine the time. Selecting which of the two points is done by assuming that you are near the surface of the Earth. (The other point tends to be thousands of kilometers in space.)

There are also corrections for atmospheric refraction and such things of course.

Ответить
@WhovianMinecrafter
@WhovianMinecrafter - 22.09.2016 04:56

I thought that this would be more detailed i.e. the specific way they code it to handle so many different orders at once (as in so many people using one satellite)

Ответить
@MarkSJBeard
@MarkSJBeard - 22.09.2016 03:19

Please, more detail on this fascinating subject!

Ответить
@tscoffey1
@tscoffey1 - 22.09.2016 01:35

Certainly just obtaining the time from each satellite does not allow you to calculate your location. Doesn't each satellite also have to broadcast the longitude and latitude that it is currently orbiting over?

Ответить
@Elastane
@Elastane - 22.09.2016 00:29

Those Balloons remind me of scanning in EvE Online arghhhhhhh

Ответить
@iKaGe01
@iKaGe01 - 22.09.2016 00:26

I actually didn't really understand that...

Ответить
@hoplite46
@hoplite46 - 22.09.2016 00:06

They dont realy know what they,re taking about

Ответить
@jamesratzlaff4353
@jamesratzlaff4353 - 21.09.2016 23:57

Is the 50Hz refresh (for location) the standard in Europe? It's 1Hz in most phones in the US.

Ответить
@davidharmeyer3093
@davidharmeyer3093 - 21.09.2016 23:34

Hang on a sec... so if you are on the intersection of 4 spheres, you know your point location. But didn't you create the spheres on distance? So how do you know the distance from each satellite not just four times if you don't know the time when you receive the data packets?

Ответить
@iprokator
@iprokator - 21.09.2016 22:52

Wrong info on Computerphile is new thing. For position equation we need 4 sats because of 4 variables. (x,y,z,t)
Current algo check for earth answers, so we elemenate multiple dots by logic, not extra sat.
On video we was told about 4 sats for 3 vars and some magic for time solve. Just misleading info, guys.

Ответить
@daviddupoise6443
@daviddupoise6443 - 21.09.2016 22:27

To learn more ... Read GPS for Land Surveyors by Jan Van Sickle. Excellent book.

Ответить
@levmatta
@levmatta - 21.09.2016 22:06

I would like another explanation, I am probably stupid but... Does the satellite send its position on orbit? How is time translated to position ? I did not actually get the surfaces intersections, I mean: the signal is always going to get to me, is it the intersection of the same time being read ?

Ответить
@SotnikovVas
@SotnikovVas - 21.09.2016 22:04

I am really surprised that the very important role of relativity (both special and general) wasn't even mentioned! This is actually an amazing and remarkable fact about GPS navigation. If the algorithms would not take into account those corrections, the whole system becomes useless very quickly. Basically every GPS user experimentally tests SR and GR on a daily basis.

Ответить
@AvastarBin
@AvastarBin - 21.09.2016 22:03

You have 666 666 subscribers. This is creepy!

Ответить
@ReachAndTouch
@ReachAndTouch - 21.09.2016 21:33

This seems to be the least obvious way of breaking down GPS. Mr Fuller's explanation totally leaves aside the connection between time and position, in other words, why and how time is used to locate your device. Which is really the underlying principle of the whole thing. And without time dilation, it's barely scratching the surface. Could do much better.

Ответить
@davorrincic1227
@davorrincic1227 - 21.09.2016 21:17

666666 subscribers!

Ответить
@STheConduit
@STheConduit - 21.09.2016 21:15

666,666 subscribers. Spooky

Ответить
@willitworks
@willitworks - 21.09.2016 21:14

666,666 subscribers who is that dude ?

Ответить
@TheTyrori
@TheTyrori - 21.09.2016 21:13

ooooh that's what triangulation is then?

Ответить
@stuffysnob
@stuffysnob - 21.09.2016 21:04

666,666 subscribers

Ответить
@mikejones-vd3fg
@mikejones-vd3fg - 21.09.2016 20:51

27th

Ответить
@bobbagum
@bobbagum - 21.09.2016 20:42

you didn't go over time dilation!

Ответить