100 MODERN SOLDIERS vs 20.000 SPARTANS | Ultimate Epic Battle Simulator

100 MODERN SOLDIERS vs 20.000 SPARTANS | Ultimate Epic Battle Simulator

RTS Battle Room

3 года назад

24,256,908 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@schmalzilla1985
@schmalzilla1985 - 02.12.2023 21:07

With the load out of 180 rounds a guy, 30 bullets a mag × 6 = 18,000 bullets, they'd run out of bullets before they got anywhere near numerically equal. So really they never had a chance to win in the first place.

Ответить
@reodimitri
@reodimitri - 01.12.2023 09:48

Ah-HaHa 🤣
100 Modern almost wouldn’t last more than 7 minutes ?!…
I don’t think 100 modern soldiers would even make it that long,
against such a mass of enemies !!!

Ответить
@reodimitri
@reodimitri - 01.12.2023 09:42

Ummmm…
Spartans could not throw any weapons in this scenario ?

Ответить
@mr.rubicon1193
@mr.rubicon1193 - 30.11.2023 09:03

Fall back.

Ответить
@Xblackhawkx9
@Xblackhawkx9 - 27.11.2023 12:03

They didn't reload once. Unrealistic

Ответить
@acupuncturekid
@acupuncturekid - 27.11.2023 08:57

Wow not one soldier had grenades? That's the first thing I'd hurl if they started coming closer. Also where are the snipers far away picking people off? Where is the shock factor of never seeing guns and for the Spartans seeing their brother on their side literally fall with blood? That alone would scare many to retreat.

Ответить
@nomvonglismerced4311
@nomvonglismerced4311 - 27.11.2023 07:42

no friendly fire with all that stacking.

Ответить
@kvantanet2297
@kvantanet2297 - 26.11.2023 15:12

Pls, no more simulations.

Ответить
@JubeiKibagamiFez
@JubeiKibagamiFez - 24.11.2023 09:55

So, I know this needs not be said, but Infinite Ammo is the number one glaring flaw in this sim. Now I ran some calcs, each modern soldier would have to carry 200 rounds if they were to have dead-on accuracy with one shot per spartan.
Two, modern soldiers of normal training are taught to fire two rounds center mass, so each soldier would have to carry 400 rounds, realistically, again, the soldiers would have to have dead-on accuracy.
Three, soldiers are taught to load 25 rounds per mag, so 16 mags would have to be carried per soldier. Normal carry for long term combat is 12 mags for small arms and another 400 rounds for automatic weapons like the SAW and 240B, each.
Four, modern soldiers would not stand stationary in a group of four rows, either. I noticed a lot of friendly fire that should have killed modern soldiers.
Five, The spartans wouldn't just keep rushing head on into anything. They would've used a pincer maneuver as quickly as possible.

I guess my point is, including reload times, this would've been over for the modern soldiers a lot quicker, even if they were using evasive maneuvers, then accounting for the inaccuracy of the shots while moving, each soldier would have to carry quadruple the amount of ammo.

Ответить
@MegaErnieMAN
@MegaErnieMAN - 23.11.2023 19:51

Both platoons would have fought differently. Ultimately the spartans of the past would have won!

Ответить
@BlkFireHawk427
@BlkFireHawk427 - 22.11.2023 06:39

Last time i checked, Even Special Opts soldiers carried about 300 round of . .556... not enough ammo.

Btw. Is this a 1800 British Military line up, or are we all flagging eachother?

Ответить
@retrograde2
@retrograde2 - 21.11.2023 12:54

Not very realistic, wouldn't they have thrown thousands of spears?

Ответить
@trujews466
@trujews466 - 21.11.2023 05:02

Arrows vs bullets would've atleast been interesting.

Ответить
@georgelser5831
@georgelser5831 - 20.11.2023 17:53

Endless ammunition, not a single overheating gun, no spears, no archers...what a piece of shi...😂

Ответить
@LACANCIONMASBELLADELMUNDO
@LACANCIONMASBELLADELMUNDO - 20.11.2023 10:40

fir3@rms overheat if they're used non stop for a long time. Very unrealistic video.

Ответить
@MatthewLum11
@MatthewLum11 - 19.11.2023 09:12

Each soldier carries 210 rounds of ammunition (seven 30-round magazines), and there were 18,106 kills. Assuming roughly 2,800 double taps, triple taps and strays, it means nearly all of them were on their last bullet. 🔫

Ответить
@spartanracer
@spartanracer - 18.11.2023 19:48

Running out of ammo, gun jams, and the need to reload not to mention the inevitable accidental friendly fire would completely change this scenario

Ответить
@HectorGarcia-sk4nz
@HectorGarcia-sk4nz - 18.11.2023 19:02

Americans think this is warfare this is a video game recreation of a ground infantry battle that makes you lose your time. Americans are stupid beyond the infinite.

Ответить
@tonyvy1510
@tonyvy1510 - 18.11.2023 08:05

wtf is this

Ответить
@justjohn9067
@justjohn9067 - 18.11.2023 05:41

Is this Russia vs Ukraine?

Ответить
@ihorsamchenko
@ihorsamchenko - 17.11.2023 01:45

А учитывалось время на перезарядку а также износ оружия во время такой интенсивной стрельбы? Спартанцы, скорее всего, во время боя, когда поняли что имеют дело с инновационным оружием и более развитыми стратегическими действиями со стороны противника, поменяли бы тактику и взяли бы в кольцо противника мелкими группами, а не сталкивались лоб в лоб. И возможно, они бы брали щиты у убитых и складывали по 3-4 штуки, прикрывая себя. И не забываем про человеческий фактор, на тебя идёт 20 000 войско, ты их слышишь за километры, земля дрожит, я думаю даже у оторваных вояк очко бы зжималось, потели бы руки и возникали бы необдуманные действия. Поэтому считаю, что спартанцы разнесли бы 100 ввоенных потеряв человек 500-600, не более.

Ответить
@shmerelize
@shmerelize - 16.11.2023 16:05

First of all, the Spartans would have moved into dome formation as soon as the first Spartan fell to bullets.
And the modern shooters would have formed a double half ring, so every time a soldier needed to reload, he was switched out. And they would be constantly retreating as soldiers swapped back to reload. It's obvious based on how the last few died that rectangular formation is pointless, and friendly fire would have killed half of them.

Ответить
@Mr-cannon
@Mr-cannon - 15.11.2023 06:04

Just give them infinite amo and 0
Relode time why don’t you

Ответить
@BlatentlyFakeName
@BlatentlyFakeName - 14.11.2023 17:06

They wouldn't have enough bullets to kill all of them and swords don't run out of ammo :D

Ответить
@williamwatts5164
@williamwatts5164 - 13.11.2023 22:02

Infinite ammo, no need to reload? I call bs

Ответить
@Upgraded4552
@Upgraded4552 - 13.11.2023 13:18

Bow and arrows would have tipped the war in Spartans favour.

Ответить
@BDavid760
@BDavid760 - 13.11.2023 06:39

100 soldiers would have only had 2,100 rounds of ammo.

Ответить
@d.jparer5184
@d.jparer5184 - 12.11.2023 21:50

You may aswell make it soldiers vs zombies every time bacause that is always what it ends up becoming.

Ответить
@camelot507
@camelot507 - 12.11.2023 03:37

Yeah, cause the modern soldiers never would have thought to MOVE BACK at all???????????? Or here's an idea.... go to HIGH GROUND !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ответить
@billycranston5481
@billycranston5481 - 10.11.2023 22:13

I wonder who is going to win lol

Ответить
@stephen6279
@stephen6279 - 09.11.2023 15:18

Plus endless ammunition

Ответить
@elizabethorr4814
@elizabethorr4814 - 09.11.2023 00:42

Stuped vid

Ответить
@akiali2632
@akiali2632 - 06.11.2023 22:40

They wud run out of ammo which ever way u look at it n then die

Ответить
@750SonyP
@750SonyP - 06.11.2023 09:28

Spartans did have bowmen and they could construct mobile barriers to hide behind after seeing hundreds of there soldiers cut down. The Maries would have done best under cover of night and not in the open.

Ответить
@andrewwarner7580
@andrewwarner7580 - 05.11.2023 01:21

In some ways these simulations are ridiculous. An American unit of 100 men would have air and support. Air support probably a couple of Apache helicopters and/or A10s. Artillery support would be available,too. Don’t forget resupply for ammunition and other supplies for the Americans. It would be a turkey shoot.

Ответить
@bondjames7867
@bondjames7867 - 04.11.2023 00:37

😂😂😂😂😂

Ответить
@TheBestRewardOffers
@TheBestRewardOffers - 03.11.2023 23:35

Reality: runs out of ammo
Also Reality: RUN

Ответить
@ronaldobetito2402
@ronaldobetito2402 - 28.10.2023 21:48

The most biased battle ever

Ответить
@innovationplayer4307
@innovationplayer4307 - 26.10.2023 02:10

'merica

Ответить
@Baard5Szomoru
@Baard5Szomoru - 23.10.2023 18:06

Leaving aside technical and historical accuracies. I think firearms and all modern weapons are the epitome of cowardice. It's a cheap trick
Make them fight with real weapons like spears, swords and so on, like real soldiers, not these modern cowards and their firearms. Leaders are even more cowards cause you all know none modern leader would put a foot on the battlefield, cowards bunch of cowards! fight like real men! Not like fa*****.

Ответить
@MatthewJohnMurphy
@MatthewJohnMurphy - 20.10.2023 11:37

That’s what they call, “a glorious victory” *slips over in blood

Ответить
@JohnVaughn-yf1rn
@JohnVaughn-yf1rn - 19.10.2023 04:31

Not once did they reload their guns 🤦

Ответить
@vicsyg5375
@vicsyg5375 - 19.10.2023 00:27

Bullshit, the Americans would have run out of ammo after 5 minutes of such a fight.)))) And the Spartans have eternal ammo!

Ответить
@musasonko3734
@musasonko3734 - 16.10.2023 12:41

No archer😂

Ответить
@musasonko3734
@musasonko3734 - 16.10.2023 12:39

No weapon loading… and bullets going through the Allie’s?😳

Ответить
@najeebladha4358
@najeebladha4358 - 15.10.2023 21:38

I like the part where the 100 men reload their guns😂

Ответить
@The.new.Creator
@The.new.Creator - 14.10.2023 12:14

thats wild LETS GET IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WOOOOOO nice idea!

Ответить
@jonvalleh
@jonvalleh - 12.10.2023 16:05

Don't reload???

Ответить
@GBart
@GBart - 11.10.2023 06:47

Spartans, standing on a mountain of their dead friends:
"it's over, modern soldiers! We have the high ground!"

Ответить
@bazzanixy
@bazzanixy - 10.10.2023 23:41

Heavy casualties.

Ответить