A LAWYER weighed in on the PointCrow situation... #shorts

Ok

I think Nintendo should say "its just a prank bro" to PointCrow and get it over with

Dude, talk about not understanding technology, congress doesn’t even know how Wifi works 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

Are they talking about Moon Channel's video?

Is that you Charlie???

Nintendo is just a trash company now

I don’t think you guys really understood the main point, nintendo is overprotective of their IPs because that’s the only thing they have, even just a little bit of modding can be harmful at a big scale to it, which would be a risk nintendo is not taking

The last 3 seconds of this clip is very passionate lol

The gaming industry was founded on mods, without valve modding the quake engine we would be 10 years behind in video games progression

I guess that the publisher do own not only assets but the engine and how things are running with games...
But it's super weird, if you don't sell it you can modify so many tangible, physical things. And even resell them legally. But just because games are digital, suddenly the customer owns nothing after the purchase, only a license for access.... yet they want to increase the price of said purchase whilst withdrawing as much as possible that's included in that license to access. It's absurd and unlike any other type of purchase.

What happened with PointCrow?

watch the video! hahhahahaha

Remember if they can't understand the concept of social media they won't understand how mods work its a lose lose situation for anyone in that community to do a legal battle.

i almost think that legaleagle didn’t understand the difference between the two situations

Trying so hard to put yourself on the same level as Pointcrow when you've been forgotten in regard to the switch since like 2018-19 💀💀💀

You dont sell mods, thats the rule modders go by.

Smallant said something interesting on the topic. He said he thought the reason that pointcrow was targeted was because he had linked the mods and how to mod games like breath of the wild in his videos. Thus, Nintendo wasn't so much mad that he was doing it, it was a case that they didn't want a spread of how to mod and manipulate their properties being advertised for everyone.

What kills me about law, is that Lawyers who only know Sooo much about aspects of life outside their profession dictate how we operate. As a software developer and engineer it irks me that we dont have enough scientists writing laws

Why would selling a modification be illegal? Should selling car paint be illegal? By this logic it should be since it’s infringing on/modifying some one else’s product.

Im pretty sure the lawyer their talking about is „Moon Channel“

why does that guy look like a budget penguinz0