$1,000 vs. $10,000 Telescope (Same Picture)

I never would have thought a bigger, more expensive telescope would have a better image.

Any more Earth shattering wisdom to drop?

Congrats from Brazil.
Thanks to bring us the quality that we can get from each type an price.

It seems to me that telescopes, like horsepower in a car, scale in price with the question of "how far do you want to see", and "how fast do you want to go".

Thank you for comparison video ! Say Williams Optics announced that RedCat51Ⅱ will be model　changed soon . Particular , focus structure system like a RedCat61 type . and New optical tube model Pleiades 68(focus length 260mm F3.8) released ! but , I checked their HP. It is out of stock now .

These photos are fake

The $1000 telescope

Talk talk talk here's two pictures and my dog .

Trevor:10 ash:5

I prefer Ash’s image. Yeah, there’s more detail in the other one, but I don’t like composite or false color images. The Universe is al ready beautiful, we don’t need to over-color it make it any better.

Those photos are really real?
Looks too beautiful and frightening

And yet NOBODY CAN SEE THE AMERICAN FLAG OR FOOT STEPS ON THE MOON YET .. BULL CHIT !! THE MOON LANDING WAS FAKE AS MORE THEN 2 GENDERS😅

Greetings from curve lake ontario. Noticed the Muskoka shirt. Must be close.
Beautiful pics. Great vid.
Take care.

great quality from both 👍,,,,🤔 so tell me this have you ever saw UFO's landing on the moon 🤔

Just Google space pics.

I am 7th standards kid I like very much astrophysics and astro photography

Sorry, was too busy crying over the vastness and grandeur of space to be able to critically judge and grade the 2 (3?) photos ;' )

Is there any way you can send me a free telescope?

Muy buenas tomas pero mucho mejor la de teléscopio de 150mm y 1050mm

where did you buy the 1000 dollars one

Not going to lie, Trevor's pic was more visually pleasing then the james web space telescopes image

So how much for a whole set up?!

If we simply compare the optical performance,
The Japanese-made Takahashi TOA-150B is the highest performance general refracting astronomical telescope sold in the world.
The reason for this is that the objective lens has extremely high optical performance and is completely aberration-free.

Petzval vs triplet

This was brilliant! Both of them! Can you share the music name please? It's wonderful❤

And people believe space is fake

Trevor great videos as always, been watching you from the start and always love seeing the progression. Would love to see you put a Seestar s50 up against the redcat rig. Yours is ZWO'd out and would be a good shootout. I just can't drop 5k plus atm to even approach your red cat rig. But i did order an S50.

Thank you. In the 70th, I had 4 ainch reflector Newton. Impressed what you can do now. Dig cams and way better tracking. Have fun. But I'm not going into the rabbit hole again.

Both images are great. But why does the nebula looks so red in color from Ashley's camera when compared to Trevor's? His camera did not show any red color in the image.

Soooo good bruh

why are the colors so much red in the first telescope compared to the rest? i really do love the colors in the 2nd scope.

Winner is NASA hands down. But both of your shots were fantastic for the equipment.

10k telescope image looks like something hubble would take

I think the best way to compare would be satisfaction vs amount of work to get the image, although a bit subjective.😂

My puzzle is, I find all the sky images are the same evrywhere, I am sure I already saw theses somewhere else , sounds like they all came from source one telescope, dyou knowhat I mean!

Can I see the image without imaging

Since the AM5 has a maximum payload of 20kg I'd like to see someone load it up with a 14.7kg scope like the Skywatcher, plus a guide scope and cameras, focuser etc, and see how it performs.

Perhaps I just got unlucky, but this is now two comparison videos in a row (by different channels) where they've compared Narrowband vs. a color sensor, when theoretically the purpose of the comparison had nothing to do with that difference. Why are you (and others) doing this? The proper comparison would have been to use LRGB filters.

To be clear, I'm fine with the color sensor vs. the mono sensor. Your goal was to show the difference between a small & low cost setup vs a big & expensive setup. Mono setups are a lot more expensive, notably bigger and much more labor intensive. So it makes sense that this is part of the comparison. (Even though the purist in me would say a comparison should change as few things as possible).

I can also overlook the use of the expensive ASI2400. Again, If I was being really picky, it would bug me as it's a pretty expensive sensor. If the goal was small and inexpensive, using something like the ASI183MC Pro would have been more to the point. But since both sensors used in the comparison are of a similar quality and cost (loosely speaking), it's hard to get too worked up about this.

But what I ABSOLUTELY can NOT ignore is Narrowband vs. full-spectrum. It completely ruins the comparison. Instead of highlighting the difference between the two telescopes, you're instead highlighting the difference between narrowband and RGB... and then throwing in a telescope size/cost delta to further muddy the waters. Why would you do that?

In this topic, bigger means better.

Is it possible to take pictures of sky objects without tracking the object over a longer time.. can it be done with a video 2 - 5 min and convert it to pictures, with stacking and then a good finish .. im a beginner.. and will soon explore the nightsky .. 🙃

And some people still think Earth is flat.....

3rd Pic looks like Man riding a chicken riding a smaller chicken

Wow for both but the $10,000 wowie, looks professional, I mean hard core National Geographic.

Both are gorgeous. Naturally the higher-priced scope has better specs and captures a better image. Both are blown out of the water by the NASA photography. Money may not buy happiness, but it definitely buys better equipment!

Batheway that Skywather is heavely overpriced..For 10 thousend dollars you can buy an Astro Physics or a Celestron 1400EDGE HD.

Nothing beats a Celestron C14.Secondhands only 3000 Dollars.

Its a sort apples and oranges comparison given the big difference in Focal length, but I would have to give Ashley a 10 and trevor a 9. The reason being, I know I'd use the hell out of that beautiful Williams.

From when it was discovered spherical aberration equation in 2018 every new apo telescope IS a scam....