Is Claude Pro Worth It? My Honest Review & Comparison to ChatGPT Plus

Is Claude Pro Worth It? My Honest Review & Comparison to ChatGPT Plus

AI Insider Tips

2 недели назад

2,058 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@rehman2017
@rehman2017 - 02.07.2024 18:49

I said, you paid me 50 for Psd file right, now you are using very simple like done in canvas you are using but mesge me on fiver I will explain

Ответить
@Tech_and_AI75
@Tech_and_AI75 - 03.07.2024 02:18

Technically you get less usage on Claude than GPT4o. With OpenAI you are downgraded to 3.5 when you run out of GPT4 messages, in Claude pro I get locked out until my new messages are available. Anthropic need to do something similar.

Ответить
@Tech_and_AI75
@Tech_and_AI75 - 03.07.2024 02:20

Claude can do projects and charts now.

Ответить
@marwentrabelsi2983
@marwentrabelsi2983 - 03.07.2024 17:40

Claude Pro is bad, accuracy is worst than gpt4, gpt 4 is very buggy web app, no one is perfect

Ответить
@kaashayee
@kaashayee - 03.07.2024 21:35

I cancelled GPT recently. They give free users 4o so I figured why waste money to get the same thing free users get. I’m starting a Claude subscription to use projects. I want to work with my own files.

Ответить
@kaashayee
@kaashayee - 03.07.2024 21:37

I also don’t like paying a company that has the NSA on their board.

Ответить
@TouchGr8ss
@TouchGr8ss - 03.07.2024 22:43

Awesome channe; brother

Ответить
@michaelburns2888
@michaelburns2888 - 04.07.2024 01:02

Copilot is at a sophomore level in the foundations of physics. Claude is at a postgraduate level in this subject - conventional vs mathematical integrity.

Ответить
@cdmichaelb
@cdmichaelb - 04.07.2024 01:29

Sorry, didn't watch your video but had to chip in on the title. No. Usage limits are too low on pro. Also lack of other common features. Claud 3.5 is great, but can't use it enough to really get use of it.

Ответить
@Arcticwhir
@Arcticwhir - 04.07.2024 02:55

I will say i've used both at work for quite complex tasks, gpt 4o is quite annoying, many times it outputs code that is the same as before (I asked for changes), Claude is more intuitive, creative, great instruction following and the speed really makes a difference. I have no proof, but its just a feeling 4o overall seems more intelligent, but its personality and instruction following is worse.

Also bing chat is good for simple tasks, would not recommend anyone actually use that if your a heavy chatbot user - its very slow and its obvious they are still using gpt4 or 4 turbo with even more restrictions making the llm less intelligent.

Ответить
@Tarantella.Serpentine
@Tarantella.Serpentine - 05.07.2024 02:41

Whats everyone using as a LOCAL Model and UI that's able to use attachments. I've tried Local Web UI with Olama but its crash's like a Stolen Car.

Ответить
@Fatman305
@Fatman305 - 05.07.2024 03:27

Keeping Claude Pro for a few months just to show my support for serious competition to ChatGPT, which I also pay for.

I also like to run same queries on both to get a broader view, or have one AI dispute/improve the answer of the other.

Ответить
@pisanghangus2
@pisanghangus2 - 05.07.2024 08:02

just pay for Poe and get both

Ответить
@nyambe
@nyambe - 05.07.2024 09:15

You don't need to go pro, but some might just no resist the temptation. So much power in your hands

Ответить
@Spathever
@Spathever - 05.07.2024 09:26

Dude you're just wrong on many accounts (and I am a ChatGPT Plus user myself as well). Never seeing you again.

Ответить
@khanra17
@khanra17 - 07.07.2024 10:28

You are a stupid 😂

Ответить
@HasimFN
@HasimFN - 12.07.2024 03:52

gpt is bad in code even perplexity is better

Ответить