Комментарии:
First comment!
ОтветитьIt's all very subjective, but for me, the Autel colours are over saturated so will need to be post edited to look better.
Although it's surprising how close this comparison is, given the Mavic 3 sensor is 30% larger than the Lite+.
I wish Autel would give us Pro settings (manual) in Log, with the Lite+.
Alright X, spoil us, how is the Evo II V3 flying??
ОтветитьI fly my Autel Lite plus Only at night !
Fpv during the day .
Interesting comparison, both drones seemed to do a good job. But I do prefer the Hasselblad color science on the Mavic 3 Classic. Great video, and thanks for sharing.
ОтветитьDude, feel sorry for us!!
Since I was born trees and nature are GREEN, not orange !!!
After 1 year, MAVIC 3 is now a COMPLETE DRONE with many features.
If they at AUTEL manage to fix the application, the pro features, the 10bit, the AWFUL AND COMPLETELY WRONG WB, (THE UNACCEPTABLE FLARE IS NOT MADE BY ANYTHING), and so many things...
that is, I guess in 2-3 years from today, do the test again!!!
Hi can you tell me where did you find the autel light plus
ОтветитьWhen is that display controller coming out for the Lite +?
Ответитьi'd rather autel evo's drone, no geo-zone restrictions at all
ОтветитьEvery single thing you compared is so subjective. That’s not how you measure/compare dynamic range! Wow just wow!
“Neither one our log when it comes to sharpness?” This is unbelievable
Can’t believe people watch this crap
What are your thoughts 🤔
Do share!