Комментарии:
I didn't think anyone still used Wikipedia or trusted the information on it. It was corrupted many years ago. I stopped donating money to them many years ago as soon as the corrupted information became evident even to me. As for the GS and many other skeptics like Mick West? I think the old saying "follow the money" and am sure you will find the tie to the military industrial complex. Just like AARO, it is the fox guarding the hen house. Same as TED talks became corrupted many years ago and became a joke, the same as mainstream media in general. Have people truly learnt so little from history, like the Church Committee? That was back in 1975, when many people finally became aware of how corrupt the system had become.
ОтветитьThanks!
ОтветитьHer only qualification is being a failed JC Penny manager. Yet she boasts about defacing pages of distinguished scientists because she doesn't like (or understand) their ideas.
Ответить☝☝☝‼‼‼‼
ОтветитьSurely there is a law about this 🙏💜
ОтветитьGreat show Matt
ОтветитьMatt!!.. I Love your work!!..But this episode is one of the best I’ve seen!!!…For the life of me I can’t understand how the upper management of Wikipedia has let this group run with reckless abandon as long as it has!!.. to think that up until the end of 2023 I would religiously donate $50 a year to their cause!!..I wouldn’t donate a wooden nickel to them now!!… It’s really a disgrace what they are doing to some individuals!!..The hit piece on Harald Malmgren and his daughter Pippa was the Straw that Broke the Camels Back for me!!…Karma is a cold hearted bitch and I hope she pays a visit to each and every one in that group!!!…🤨😠…
ОтветитьThew new camera quality is amazing...
ОтветитьScathing. I love it! 👍🏻😎
ОтветитьAwsome video matt good stuff
ОтветитьThey are doing nasty work with the Spanish language pages. It’s wild how much blatant false information gets to stay. They even have workshops on how to manipulate Wikipedia.
ОтветитьMany thanks for this eye-opening report!
ОтветитьExcellent show Matt, well done. Speaking of exposing disinformation, New Paradigm Institute has released: "The Disinformation Series essay collection outlines how the U.S. government has systematically used secrecy, disinformation, and legislative controls to suppress public understanding of Non-Human Intelligence, UAP, and advanced scientific research—thereby obstructing transparency, accountability, and discovery" Written by Kevin Wright of the Roswell Daily Record. Great job Kevin !!
Also referenced in the essay is an article from Rolling Stone Magazine by Carl Bernstein (Watergate scandal reporter): "The CIA And The Media"- "How Americas Most Powerful News Media Worked Hand in Glove with the Central Intelligence Agency and Why the Church Committee Covered It Up" I'd also like to personally recommend the famous article: "The Black Budget of the United States: The Engine of a "Negative Return Economy" by Chris Sanders and Catherine Austin Fitts (Former Assistant Admin. of HUD under George H.W. Bush), World Affairs Volume 8, Number 2 (April-June 2004) , available for free at CIAO (Columbia International Affairs Online)
Tell it like it is Matt Ford!
ОтветитьAwesome Matt👍👍👍
ОтветитьI am so disgusted with these liars
ОтветитьI wish I was a hacker
ОтветитьI wanna know what we can all do to combat this. Thank you so much, Matt. I truly appreciate your service.
ОтветитьNailed it, like a boss... What a masterful articulation of words and ideas... The best TGTS ever. Spoke for many of us...
ОтветитьThe whole skeptic community went down hill after atheism+ entered the scene. The + was + socialism.
ОтветитьCompletely awesome🎉❤🎉
ОтветитьAWESOME!!
Ответить@thequirkzone
ОтветитьThank you for highlighting this, enjoyed the video.
ОтветитьMy understanding is that this goes all the way to the top, namely to Jimmy Wales.
His co-founder spoke out in protest against what WikiLeaks has become regarding censorship in favour of Establishment narratives on any remotely controversial issue.
For example, one of the most remarkable journalists today, Aaron Maté, has been blacklisted by WikiLeaks as a source worth citing, even though he's written for The Nation (I think it was).
IIRC, Wales has been linked to one or more of these various government "disinformation" campaigns, which have networks of funders including NATO, and which are obviously propaganda campaigns, even if they don't think that's what they're doing.
These institutions might honestly believe that they're right about every position they hold to the extent of having the right to censor others.
But as you say, it's arrogant to assume that one knows and is right about everything and will still be right about it tomorrow. That's why we have free speech and open discourse and the dialectic method.
It's just a fact vs fact debate that you are loosing. You just need some facts. If you can't find supporting facts for your views, I guess then you have to attack the people with the opposite views. Cry baby.
ОтветитьThey shouldn’t be allowed to do this. People should stop donating to wiki until this stops
ОтветитьMissed you brother! You have a great and unique platform, keep up the good work.
ОтветитьWas curious about Susan’s small 🎩 top hat so did some digging! Wow, this sounds correct!! If a woman chooses to wear a tiny top-hat it’s a voluntary expression of subservience or submission. It represents a symbolic shrinking of status. It’s a hat that doesn’t protect, doesn’t dignify, doesn’t elevate. It decorates while mocking, which is signaling mockery, objectification, or diminished authority. It’s also implied she’s a prop in someone else’s show, an ornament, or even a “trained act.” The tiny top-hat may act like a modern-day jester’s cap or dunce cap, marking the wearer as someone meant to be laughed at, not with.
ОтветитьWhat they are doing is so terrible.
It’s obvious they have an anti-transparency agenda.
nice show, Matt...expose these loons
ОтветитьKeep up the good fight, thank you Matt.
ОтветитьWell said
Ответитьwell researched and articulated
ОтветитьI blocked Wikipedia from all my devices because of this group, and just stopped using it. RIP Wikipedia.
ОтветитьHaha get em matt 🤘🤘
ОтветитьWikipedia has always been bad, but this group makes it terrible. The idealist concept of Wikipedia is nice on paper, but of course there are paid editor groups perverting the truth and it's a big business.
I would also like to follow the money and I'm curious about who hires their services as well. This immoral group and this perverted individual Susan are the frontline of what are possibly layers and layers of escape goats, though. My hypothesis of entities that bank them full time (or hire them for jobs) ranges from the CIA to the KGB and the CCP. So I really have no clue!
Can we distill the agenda of what they are promoting and censoring so that we can profile them just like what you did with ChatGPT? Or is it already too apparent that it's a CIA control group trying to keep the program with Lockheed Martin and Co. quiet?
Wait until someone takes them to court for publishing lies.
ОтветитьWell said Matt👏👏The cult of sceptoids has to be stopped as it helps create the stigma around this subject that makes it so hard to have a conversation about it with family, friends etc. This woman thinks she is so right in what she’s doing which says to me a certain lack of self awareness or her motives are connected to the deep state as in if there’s no there there why bother. VERY Suss to say the least🇦🇺😎
ОтветитьWikipedia has been a pile of junk for years. It's always been editited (sensored) by the likes of GCHQ well before this group started up. Google assistant used to use it all the time for it's answers and doesn't anymore. It's even too toxic for Google.
ОтветитьDistortion of history they do well.The victors decide what reality we should go along with.Even if its BS.
ОтветитьHELL YES MATT! This was incredible!
ОтветитьNo one I know uses Wikipedia anymore because of people like gerbitch. I was recently told about a huge movement that’s going to take the entire site down. That would really rain on her parade 😂
ОтветитьThanks for calling her out. What’s really annoying is her extremely narcissistic attitude. She’s the Queen of Wikipedia Road Rage.
ОтветитьShe ain't gonna dude.
ОтветитьMic drop. Love this. THANK YOU MATT. I emailed Susan years ago about my first-hand encounter and she completely bowled over me. She's not a good scientist or skeptic.
ОтветитьNarcissism on parade with these "gorillas"
ОтветитьHaven't donated to Fascipedia for a while. Excellent job Matt🎉
Ответить