World's SAFEST Airlines

World's SAFEST Airlines

Aaron Rheins

9 месяцев назад

2,829,032 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@user-ih9fd6wh3o
@user-ih9fd6wh3o - 07.02.2024 19:27

how about finnair its 101 years old and no crashes

Ответить
@nathaliedoliget2705
@nathaliedoliget2705 - 07.02.2024 12:35

Bro am french and we got thé concorde that only got 1 crash

Ответить
@detect1ve6903
@detect1ve6903 - 07.02.2024 12:09

These are Qantas’s jet airliner accidents and incidents
Qantas Flight 1 (QF1/QFA1), 23 September 1999

During the approach to Bangkok, the weather conditions deteriorated significantly, from 5 statute mile visibility half an hour before landing to approximately one half statute mile visibility at the time of landing. The flight crew observed a storm cloud over the airport and ground reports were that it was raining heavily. However, these conditions are common at Bangkok. Seven minutes prior to Flight 1's landing, a Thai Airways Airbus A330 landed normally, but three minutes before Flight 1's landing another Qantas Boeing 747 (QF15, a Sydney-Rome via Bangkok service), conducted a go-around due to poor visibility during final approach. The crew of Qantas Flight 1, however, were unaware of this.

The first officer was flying the aircraft during the final approach. The aircraft's altitude and airspeed were high, but were within company limits. The rain was now heavy enough that the runway lights were visible only intermittently after each windscreen wiper stroke. Just before touchdown the captain, concerned about the long touchdown point (over 3,000 feet [910 m] past the runway threshold) and unable to see the end of the runway, ordered the first officer to perform a "go-around" and the first officer advanced the throttles but did not engage the takeoff/go-around switch (TO/GA). At this point, visibility improved markedly and the landing gear contacted the runway, although the aircraft continued to accelerate. The captain then decided to cancel the go-around by retarding the thrust levers, even though he was not flying the aircraft. This caused confusion as he did not announce his actions to the first officer who still had formal control. When over-riding the first officer's actions, the captain inadvertently left one engine at TO/GA power and as a result cancelled the preselected auto-brake settings.

The landing continued, but manual braking did not commence until the aircraft was over 5,200 feet (1,600 m) down the runway. The aircraft then began to aquaplane and skid its way down the runway, departing substantially from the runway centreline. Company standard operating procedures mandated that idle reverse thrust should be used for landings and that flaps should be set at 25 degrees,[1]: 17  not the maximum of 30 degrees. The combination of flaps 25, no auto-braking, no reverse thrust, a high and fast approach, a late touchdown, poor cockpit resource management, and the standing water on the runway led to a runway overshoot.

The aircraft gradually decelerated, ran off the end of the runway over a stretch of boggy grassland, colliding with a ground radio antenna as it did so, and came to rest with its nose resting on the perimeter road. The ground on the other side of the road forms part of a golf course.

There were no significant passenger injuries during an orderly evacuation of the aircraft carried out some 20 minutes after the rough landing. Thirty-eight passengers reported minor injuries.

Damage

The collision with the antenna caused the nose and right wing landing gear to collapse, the nose landing gear being forced back into the fuselage. The aircraft slid along in a nose-down, right wing low attitude, causing some further damage to the nose and damage to the two right engines and their mountings. The intrusion of the nose landing gear also caused the failure of the cabin intercom and public address system.

The damage was such that the aircraft was initially a write-off, but to preserve its reputation Qantas had it repaired at a cost of approximately AU$100 million (the exact figure was never disclosed by Qantas) Returning the aircraft to service enabled Qantas to retain its record of having no hull-loss accidents since the advent of the Jet Age, and also proved to be the more economical option for the time, as a new 747-400 was listed close to $200 million.

Ответить
@Kenny-tv-man
@Kenny-tv-man - 07.02.2024 11:57

Qantas flight 32...

Ответить
@Notactuallynerd_the_Avgeek_5
@Notactuallynerd_the_Avgeek_5 - 07.02.2024 11:29

Actually qantas had fatal crash when they operate old planes in the 30s-40s

Ответить
@hirmanali6507
@hirmanali6507 - 07.02.2024 11:07

5 is supposed to be royal brunei only 1 major crash

Ответить
@user-yj5ds3un5v
@user-yj5ds3un5v - 07.02.2024 09:47

Bruh a b747 Qantas had crash it was a overrun

Ответить
@Packersmaddenfan
@Packersmaddenfan - 07.02.2024 07:07

Hawaiian left the chat:

Ответить
@user-nf8oq2pb5k
@user-nf8oq2pb5k - 07.02.2024 02:50

No it’s Air Canada Canada have a high did millions of emergency landings

Ответить
@nain1948
@nain1948 - 06.02.2024 21:56

Lol first is hawaii

Ответить
@YoR8DPlanet
@YoR8DPlanet - 06.02.2024 15:49

Qantas flight 1: Am I a joke to you?

Ответить
@ArkinYuriel
@ArkinYuriel - 06.02.2024 13:29

qantas flight 001 had a crash

Ответить
@shirleycastillo-xs2nl
@shirleycastillo-xs2nl - 06.02.2024 12:23

Emirates is better than quantity right now

Ответить
@1d4lifeonedirection
@1d4lifeonedirection - 06.02.2024 11:47

Kia Ora Air New Zealand is amazing!!

Ответить
@KingextikplaysYT
@KingextikplaysYT - 06.02.2024 10:35

I main fly air New Zealand it great Service

Ответить
@haqimydangaming
@haqimydangaming - 06.02.2024 09:23

Malaysia airlines:It's 2024 and we doesn't have a crash now
2014:mh370

Ответить
@notuglyqualitymodels
@notuglyqualitymodels - 05.02.2024 23:10

Qantas had a very close call with a B747 some time ago at I think Kuala Lumpur, but the pilots handled it extremely well and saves what would be a fatal crash

Ответить
@MCBE_Gamer-06
@MCBE_Gamer-06 - 05.02.2024 22:30

Singapore Flight 006: ...

Ответить
@ZEROMD988
@ZEROMD988 - 05.02.2024 18:18

Transaero;🗿

Ответить
@Indonesianboi105
@Indonesianboi105 - 05.02.2024 13:15

Qantas flight 32: sniffs it’s smells like fire looks at engines AAHHHHHH EMERGENCY LANDING IMMEDIATELY

Ответить
@user-rq1zq8wz8z
@user-rq1zq8wz8z - 05.02.2024 12:45

No now 2024

Ответить
@shakiraarrisha6254
@shakiraarrisha6254 - 05.02.2024 07:44

How about Ryanair???

Ответить
@zachlevi5050
@zachlevi5050 - 04.02.2024 20:36

How about flight Q001 of QANTAS??? isn't that included????????

Ответить
@aviationfan330
@aviationfan330 - 04.02.2024 18:31

2024 gang
👇

Ответить
@Aviationcircle752
@Aviationcircle752 - 04.02.2024 17:00

Bro forget air new zealand 888😂

Ответить
@PilotTrainingFlightSim
@PilotTrainingFlightSim - 04.02.2024 13:01

Qantas: in our airline, we don’t crash, we fly!
Ryanair: in our airline, we crash and you die

Ответить
@hongpan2240
@hongpan2240 - 04.02.2024 09:58

Actually, Qantas does have some crash history, including two shootdown in World War 2. In all Qantas has 12 crashes.

Ответить
@saminabibi829
@saminabibi829 - 04.02.2024 03:42

"Etihad had no fatal crash" bro forgot about the a340 etihad cargo crash

Ответить
@Casp3rSpin0747
@Casp3rSpin0747 - 04.02.2024 02:02

Southwest 💀

Ответить
@farhadmallick8509
@farhadmallick8509 - 03.02.2024 13:10

Emirates left the chat😢

Ответить
@catoostorlol
@catoostorlol - 03.02.2024 12:58

Ryanair: We only crash our wheels.

Ответить
@user-gc7tk1gc2f
@user-gc7tk1gc2f - 03.02.2024 11:16

YO YOU FORGOT EL AL

Ответить
@Islandofreels_french
@Islandofreels_french - 03.02.2024 07:46

Where is emerites

Ответить
@Kale-random-theman
@Kale-random-theman - 03.02.2024 04:28

Alaska airlines left the chat

Ответить
@user-oc8it4tt8g
@user-oc8it4tt8g - 02.02.2024 21:33

bro qantas has alot of crashes liem wants flight 72

Ответить
@Xiope10
@Xiope10 - 02.02.2024 21:29

The pilot in 2013 can be thanked 🎉

Ответить
@user-to2yz2ee9m
@user-to2yz2ee9m - 02.02.2024 21:10

What about air canada😢

Ответить
@Hahahaveryfuuuuunny
@Hahahaveryfuuuuunny - 02.02.2024 18:48

Quantas flight 32

Ответить
@user-gi2os1ov8n
@user-gi2os1ov8n - 02.02.2024 15:53

You know qantas flight 521, 21 and more??????💀💀💀💀💀

Ответить
@deanjohnson7819
@deanjohnson7819 - 02.02.2024 10:19

🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺

Ответить
@canada_fr
@canada_fr - 02.02.2024 09:05

also Volaris only had some tail strikes, idk if that counts as no crashes

Ответить
@zahirislam6952
@zahirislam6952 - 02.02.2024 04:58

Biman Bangladesh has never had a crash!

Ответить
@chiefpadccltcmendoza3541
@chiefpadccltcmendoza3541 - 02.02.2024 03:32

No United 175?!?

Ответить
@Peleinao
@Peleinao - 01.02.2024 15:21

Etihad has no crashes I think

Ответить
@TheBESTaviationfan
@TheBESTaviationfan - 01.02.2024 12:37

What about LOT? I mean they had some crashes, but they are soon being 100 years old

Ответить
@Thatgirldraws3
@Thatgirldraws3 - 01.02.2024 10:35

Me flying EVA airline 🤨🤨

Ответить
@coatara150
@coatara150 - 01.02.2024 10:14

Qatar: never had a fatal incident
Jetstar: yeet, never had any incident

Ответить
@MonkeyVr-mt6qf
@MonkeyVr-mt6qf - 01.02.2024 09:34

Man, I’m happy to be Australian

Ответить
@Charll1ce596
@Charll1ce596 - 01.02.2024 04:55

Now I’m asking my dad to fly Singapore Airlines😂

Ответить
@antoneoramirez4444
@antoneoramirez4444 - 01.02.2024 03:34

What about Qatar 32?

Ответить