Комментарии:
how about finnair its 101 years old and no crashes
ОтветитьBro am french and we got thé concorde that only got 1 crash
ОтветитьThese are Qantas’s jet airliner accidents and incidents
Qantas Flight 1 (QF1/QFA1), 23 September 1999
During the approach to Bangkok, the weather conditions deteriorated significantly, from 5 statute mile visibility half an hour before landing to approximately one half statute mile visibility at the time of landing. The flight crew observed a storm cloud over the airport and ground reports were that it was raining heavily. However, these conditions are common at Bangkok. Seven minutes prior to Flight 1's landing, a Thai Airways Airbus A330 landed normally, but three minutes before Flight 1's landing another Qantas Boeing 747 (QF15, a Sydney-Rome via Bangkok service), conducted a go-around due to poor visibility during final approach. The crew of Qantas Flight 1, however, were unaware of this.
The first officer was flying the aircraft during the final approach. The aircraft's altitude and airspeed were high, but were within company limits. The rain was now heavy enough that the runway lights were visible only intermittently after each windscreen wiper stroke. Just before touchdown the captain, concerned about the long touchdown point (over 3,000 feet [910 m] past the runway threshold) and unable to see the end of the runway, ordered the first officer to perform a "go-around" and the first officer advanced the throttles but did not engage the takeoff/go-around switch (TO/GA). At this point, visibility improved markedly and the landing gear contacted the runway, although the aircraft continued to accelerate. The captain then decided to cancel the go-around by retarding the thrust levers, even though he was not flying the aircraft. This caused confusion as he did not announce his actions to the first officer who still had formal control. When over-riding the first officer's actions, the captain inadvertently left one engine at TO/GA power and as a result cancelled the preselected auto-brake settings.
The landing continued, but manual braking did not commence until the aircraft was over 5,200 feet (1,600 m) down the runway. The aircraft then began to aquaplane and skid its way down the runway, departing substantially from the runway centreline. Company standard operating procedures mandated that idle reverse thrust should be used for landings and that flaps should be set at 25 degrees,[1]: 17 not the maximum of 30 degrees. The combination of flaps 25, no auto-braking, no reverse thrust, a high and fast approach, a late touchdown, poor cockpit resource management, and the standing water on the runway led to a runway overshoot.
The aircraft gradually decelerated, ran off the end of the runway over a stretch of boggy grassland, colliding with a ground radio antenna as it did so, and came to rest with its nose resting on the perimeter road. The ground on the other side of the road forms part of a golf course.
There were no significant passenger injuries during an orderly evacuation of the aircraft carried out some 20 minutes after the rough landing. Thirty-eight passengers reported minor injuries.
Damage
The collision with the antenna caused the nose and right wing landing gear to collapse, the nose landing gear being forced back into the fuselage. The aircraft slid along in a nose-down, right wing low attitude, causing some further damage to the nose and damage to the two right engines and their mountings. The intrusion of the nose landing gear also caused the failure of the cabin intercom and public address system.
The damage was such that the aircraft was initially a write-off, but to preserve its reputation Qantas had it repaired at a cost of approximately AU$100 million (the exact figure was never disclosed by Qantas) Returning the aircraft to service enabled Qantas to retain its record of having no hull-loss accidents since the advent of the Jet Age, and also proved to be the more economical option for the time, as a new 747-400 was listed close to $200 million.
Qantas flight 32...
ОтветитьActually qantas had fatal crash when they operate old planes in the 30s-40s
Ответить5 is supposed to be royal brunei only 1 major crash
ОтветитьBruh a b747 Qantas had crash it was a overrun
ОтветитьHawaiian left the chat:
ОтветитьNo it’s Air Canada Canada have a high did millions of emergency landings
ОтветитьLol first is hawaii
ОтветитьQantas flight 1: Am I a joke to you?
Ответитьqantas flight 001 had a crash
ОтветитьEmirates is better than quantity right now
ОтветитьKia Ora Air New Zealand is amazing!!
ОтветитьI main fly air New Zealand it great Service
ОтветитьMalaysia airlines:It's 2024 and we doesn't have a crash now
2014:mh370
Qantas had a very close call with a B747 some time ago at I think Kuala Lumpur, but the pilots handled it extremely well and saves what would be a fatal crash
ОтветитьSingapore Flight 006: ...
ОтветитьTransaero;🗿
ОтветитьQantas flight 32: sniffs it’s smells like fire looks at engines AAHHHHHH EMERGENCY LANDING IMMEDIATELY
ОтветитьNo now 2024
ОтветитьHow about Ryanair???
ОтветитьHow about flight Q001 of QANTAS??? isn't that included????????
Ответить2024 gang
👇
Bro forget air new zealand 888😂
ОтветитьQantas: in our airline, we don’t crash, we fly!
Ryanair: in our airline, we crash and you die
Actually, Qantas does have some crash history, including two shootdown in World War 2. In all Qantas has 12 crashes.
Ответить"Etihad had no fatal crash" bro forgot about the a340 etihad cargo crash
ОтветитьSouthwest 💀
ОтветитьEmirates left the chat😢
ОтветитьRyanair: We only crash our wheels.
ОтветитьYO YOU FORGOT EL AL
ОтветитьWhere is emerites
ОтветитьAlaska airlines left the chat
Ответитьbro qantas has alot of crashes liem wants flight 72
ОтветитьThe pilot in 2013 can be thanked 🎉
ОтветитьWhat about air canada😢
ОтветитьQuantas flight 32
ОтветитьYou know qantas flight 521, 21 and more??????💀💀💀💀💀
Ответить🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺
Ответитьalso Volaris only had some tail strikes, idk if that counts as no crashes
ОтветитьBiman Bangladesh has never had a crash!
ОтветитьNo United 175?!?
ОтветитьEtihad has no crashes I think
ОтветитьWhat about LOT? I mean they had some crashes, but they are soon being 100 years old
ОтветитьMe flying EVA airline 🤨🤨
ОтветитьQatar: never had a fatal incident
Jetstar: yeet, never had any incident
Man, I’m happy to be Australian
ОтветитьNow I’m asking my dad to fly Singapore Airlines😂
ОтветитьWhat about Qatar 32?
Ответить