Lionel Messi offside goal controversy | Argentina’s 3rd goal | Argentina v France, World Cup final

It doesn’t matter that the ball wasn’t passed directly to Messi. Messi was still apart of the play and interfered with the play as he drew a defender away from him who could’ve stopped L Martinez. The incident with Vinicius/Richarlison is very similar to this

Argentina ⭐️ 🇦🇷 ⭐️ 🇦🇷 ⭐️ 🇦🇷

Lol how is that offside? By that logic every goal should be offside because at some point the Stricker are in the offside position

Its not offside brainless

Very obvious you don't know who received the pass. It wasn't Messi

Messi didn't even score so it couldn't be offside

If you ask me: Was Messi offside BEFORE the ball was passed to Martinez? YES!
Was he offside when Martinez passed it to him? NO!
Why can't people understand basic rules of the game?
You establish Messi to be in an offside position and later, we can clearly see him REVERT BACK to being onside. "The defender getting distracted by trying to mark Messi" excuse is worth diddlysquat. The ball was passed to Lautaro, who was unfortunately for you, ONSIDE. Retrospect, although Thuram was running with Messi in order to mark him, he was watching the movement of the ball on the field like the other players. There is no excuse such as "distracted." If you're a player, you're supposed to remain vigilant about everything happening on the pitch.

i understand... that you dont understand what you are talking about

This is the dumbest thing I have ever seen. A video made by someone watching their first ever game of football during the final, for other people like them :)

sure he was offside. what an idiot xDDD s

IT MATTERS THAT THE BALL WAS NOT PASSED DIRECTLY TO MESSI BECAUSE THE RULES STATE THAT "IN THE OPINION OF THE REFEREE." DONT FORGET THAT PART OF THE RULES BECAUSE ITS ALSO VERY IMPORTANT. THE RULES DON'T STATE THAT "IN THE OPINION OF MESSI HATERS."
DID YOU ALSO KNOW THAT THE REFEREE CANNOT CHECK VAR ONCE HE BLOWS THE WHISTLE TO RESTART THE GAME AFTER A GOAL EVEN IF THE VIDEO IS THERE? THIS IS ANOTHER RULE AND IT HAS TO BE RESPECTED TOO.
THIS HAPPENED TO FRANCE VS TUNISIA WHERE FRANCE SCORED A GOAL, BUT THE REF RULED IT OFFSIDE AND COULDN'T CHECK VAR BECAUSE THE WHISTLE HAD ALREADY BEEN BLOWN FOR A RESTART, SO THE OPINION OF THE REFEREE IN THE RULES IS ALSO A RULE AND THE REF MUST RESPECT THE RULE THAT STATES THAT HE CANT CHECK VAR IF HE HAS BLOWN THE WHISTLE FOR A RESTART. OF-COURSE WHAT IS WEIRD IN THAT GAME IS THAT THE REF RESTARTED THE GAME INSTEAD OF GIVING THE OFFSIDE. A FEW MOMENTS LATER AFTER THE RESTART THE GAME CAME TO AN END. THAT WAS SHOCKING FROM THE REF AND IT MADE HIM LOOK INCOMPETENT.
THE FRANCE GOAL WAS NOT OFFSIDE FROM LOOKING AT THE VIDEO BECAUSE GRIEZMAN SCORED THE GOAL AFTER IT WAS TOUCHED BY THE TUNISIA PLAYER. THAT WAS A CLEAR GOAL AND YES FRANCE WAS ROBBED, BUT UNFORTUNATELY THE OTHER RULES HAVE TO STAND RIGHT??? LET ME EXPLAIN.
WHEN GRIEZMAN WAS WAITING TO GET THE BALL IN THE 18 YARD BOX HE WAS CLEARLY OFFSIDE, BUT LUCKILY FOR HIM, WHEN IT GOT THERE IT WAS TOUCHED BY THE TUNISIA PLAYER FIRST AND THEN GRIEZMAN SCORED AFTER. BUT THE RULES STATE THAT THE DEFENDERS PLAY IS SUPPOSED TO HAVE BEEN DELIBERATE, BUT SINCE HE WAS UNDER PRESSURE BECAUSE OF GRIEZMAN THEN IT WAS NOT DELIBERATE THEREFORE IT WAS OFFSIDE. THIS PART OF THE RULES CAN BE SUBJECTIVE AND WE HAVE TO LEAVE IT UP THE THE REF(OPINION OF THE REF IS PART OF THE RULES REMEMBER?). SINCE THE DEFENDER WAS UNDER PRESSURE ITS LIKELY THAT IT WAS OFFSIDE.
BUT THE REF CAUSED CONTROVERSY BY RESTARTING THE GAME INSTEAD OF GIVING TUNISIA THE OFFSIDE. THIS PART FROM THE REF I DO NOT AGREE WITH, BUT I GUESS HE DID IT BECAUSE HE DID NOT WANT TO HAVE TO PULL OUT A PDF IN THE MIDDLE OF THE GAME AND START EXPLAINING HIMSELF ABOUT WHAT POWERS HE HAS. THE REF ABUSED HIS POWER BY DOING THAT AND THAT IS ALL THAT IS TRUE. ALL CALLS BY HIM WERE CORRECT, BUT YOU HAVE TO KNOW THE RULES TO KNOW THIS. IF YOU DONT KNOW THE RULES THEN U WILL SAY FRANCE WAS ROBBED THAT GOAL. THAT IS WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE WITHOUT KNOWING THE RULES, BUT IT WAS NOT THE CASE. IT WAS A FAIR CALL.
IN MESSI'S CASE THE BALL WAS NOT PLAYED TO HIM AND HIS OFFSIDE POSITION WAS VERY TIGHT TOO COMPARED TO THAT OF GRIEZMAN IN THE TUNISIA GAME. THIS AFFECTED "THE OPINION" OF THE REF AND AS WE HAVE SEEN IN MANY GAMES, THAT IS GENERALLY NOT CALLED OFFSIDE EVEN AFTER VAR CHECK. WHEN THE PLAY STARTED, MESSI WAS FAR FROM THE 18 YARD BOX AND THE PLAY WAS NOT TO HIM PLUS IT WAS IN THE AIR. THE PLAY WAS TO MARTINEZ WHO THEN PLAYED IT BACKWARDS TO MESSI. BY THAT TIME MESSI WAS IN AN ONSIDE POSITION AND STILL SURROUNDED BY FRANCE PLAYERS SO THERE WAS STILL NO SUCH THING AS A DISADVANTAGE FOR FRANCE OR ADVANTAGE FOR ARGENTINA. WHAT PROVES THIS EVEN MORE ARE THREE PIECES OF INFORMATION.
1. THE DISTANCE FROM THE GOAL 2.THE BALL BEING PLAYED IN THE AIR TO MARTINEZ 3. THE BALL BEING PASSED BACKWARDS TO MESSI WHO WAS STILL SURROUNDED BY FRANCE PLAYERS.
THESE 3 POINTS PROVE THAT THE WAS NO SUCH THING AS MESSI IMPACTING THE ABILITY OF A FRANCE PLAYER OR PLAYERS TO PLAY THE BALL. THE BALL WAS IN THE AIR FOR CHRIST SAKE!!!!!!
IT IS VERY SUBJECTIVE TO SAY THAT MESSI INTERFERED WITH PLAY WHEN HE CAME FROM A TIGHT OFFSIDE POSITION. HE HAD A DEFENDER RIGHT NEXT TO HIM AND AND THE BALL WAS NOT INTENDED FOR HIM. BY THE TIME HE TOUCHED THE BALL HE WAS NOT OFFSIDE. HE HAD RAN QUITE A DISTANCE FROM HIS INITIAL POINT TOGETHER WITH FRANCE DEFENDERS WHO WERE AHEAD OF HIM. AND ALSO REMEMBER THAT MESSI SCORED HIS GOAL AFTER THE KEEPER PUSHED THE BALL AWAY INTO MESSIS DIRECTION. AT THAT POINT THE GOAL HAD TO STAND.

IT MATTERS THAT THE BALL WAS NOT PASSED DIRECTLY TO MESSI BECAUSE THE RULES STATE THAT "IN THE OPINION OF THE REFEREE." DONT FORGET THAT PART OF THE RULES BECAUSE ITS ALSO VERY IMPORTANT. THE RULES DON'T STATE THAT "IN THE OPINION OF MESSI HATERS."
DID YOU ALSO KNOW THAT THE REFEREE CANNOT CHECK VAR ONCE HE BLOWS THE WHISTLE TO RESTART THE GAME AFTER A GOAL EVEN IF THE VIDEO IS THERE? THIS IS ANOTHER RULE AND IT HAS TO BE RESPECTED TOO.
THIS HAPPENED TO FRANCE VS TUNISIA WHERE FRANCE SCORED A GOAL, BUT THE REF RULED IT OFFSIDE AND COULDN'T CHECK VAR BECAUSE THE WHISTLE HAD ALREADY BEEN BLOWN FOR A RESTART, SO THE OPINION OF THE REFEREE IN THE RULES IS ALSO A RULE AND THE REF MUST RESPECT THE RULE THAT STATES THAT HE CANT CHECK VAR IF HE HAS BLOWN THE WHISTLE FOR A RESTART. OF-COURSE WHAT IS WEIRD IN THAT GAME IS THAT THE REF RESTARTED THE GAME INSTEAD OF GIVING THE OFFSIDE. A FEW MOMENTS LATER AFTER THE RESTART THE GAME CAME TO AN END. THAT WAS SHOCKING FROM THE REF AND IT MADE HIM LOOK INCOMPETENT.
THE FRANCE GOAL WAS NOT OFFSIDE FROM LOOKING AT THE VIDEO BECAUSE GRIEZMAN SCORED THE GOAL AFTER IT WAS TOUCHED BY THE TUNISIA PLAYER. THAT WAS A CLEAR GOAL AND YES FRANCE WAS ROBBED, BUT UNFORTUNATELY THE OTHER RULES HAVE TO STAND RIGHT??? LET ME EXPLAIN.
WHEN GRIEZMAN WAS WAITING TO GET THE BALL IN THE 18 YARD BOX HE WAS CLEARLY OFFSIDE, BUT LUCKILY FOR HIM, WHEN IT GOT THERE IT WAS TOUCHED BY THE TUNISIA PLAYER FIRST AND THEN GRIEZMAN SCORED AFTER. BUT THE RULES STATE THAT THE DEFENDERS PLAY IS SUPPOSED TO HAVE BEEN DELIBERATE, BUT SINCE HE WAS UNDER PRESSURE BECAUSE OF GRIEZMAN THEN IT WAS NOT DELIBERATE THEREFORE IT WAS OFFSIDE. THIS PART OF THE RULES CAN BE SUBJECTIVE AND WE HAVE TO LEAVE IT UP THE THE REF(OPINION OF THE REF IS PART OF THE RULES REMEMBER?). SINCE THE DEFENDER WAS UNDER PRESSURE ITS LIKELY THAT IT WAS OFFSIDE.
BUT THE REF CAUSED CONTROVERSY BY RESTARTING THE GAME INSTEAD OF GIVING TUNISIA THE OFFSIDE. THIS PART FROM THE REF I DO NOT AGREE WITH, BUT I GUESS HE DID IT BECAUSE HE DID NOT WANT TO HAVE TO PULL OUT A PDF IN THE MIDDLE OF THE GAME AND START EXPLAINING HIMSELF ABOUT WHAT POWERS HE HAS. THE REF ABUSED HIS POWER BY DOING THAT AND THAT IS ALL THAT IS TRUE. ALL CALLS BY HIM WERE CORRECT, BUT YOU HAVE TO KNOW THE RULES TO KNOW THIS. IF YOU DONT KNOW THE RULES THEN U WILL SAY FRANCE WAS ROBBED THAT GOAL. THAT IS WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE WITHOUT KNOWING THE RULES, BUT IT WAS NOT THE CASE. IT WAS A FAIR CALL.
IN MESSI'S CASE THE BALL WAS NOT PLAYED TO HIM AND HIS OFFSIDE POSITION WAS VERY TIGHT TOO COMPARED TO THAT OF GRIEZMAN IN THE TUNISIA GAME. THIS AFFECTED "THE OPINION" OF THE REF AND AS WE HAVE SEEN IN MANY GAMES, THAT IS GENERALLY NOT CALLED OFFSIDE EVEN AFTER VAR CHECK. WHEN THE PLAY STARTED, MESSI WAS FAR FROM THE 18 YARD BOX AND THE PLAY WAS NOT TO HIM PLUS IT WAS IN THE AIR. THE PLAY WAS TO MARTINEZ WHO THEN PLAYED IT BACKWARDS TO MESSI. BY THAT TIME MESSI WAS IN AN ONSIDE POSITION AND STILL SURROUNDED BY FRANCE PLAYERS SO THERE WAS STILL NO SUCH THING AS A DISADVANTAGE FOR FRANCE OR ADVANTAGE FOR ARGENTINA. WHAT PROVES THIS EVEN MORE ARE THREE PIECES OF INFORMATION.
1. THE DISTANCE FROM THE GOAL 2.THE BALL BEING PLAYED IN THE AIR TO MARTINEZ 3. THE BALL BEING PASSED BACKWARDS TO MESSI WHO WAS STILL SURROUNDED BY FRANCE PLAYERS.
THESE 3 POINTS PROVE THAT THE WAS NO SUCH THING AS MESSI IMPACTING THE ABILITY OF A FRANCE PLAYER OR PLAYERS TO PLAY THE BALL. THE BALL WAS IN THE AIR FOR CHRIST SAKE!!!!!!
IT IS VERY SUBJECTIVE TO SAY THAT MESSI INTERFERED WITH PLAY WHEN HE CAME FROM A TIGHT OFFSIDE POSITION. HE HAD A DEFENDER RIGHT NEXT TO HIM AND AND THE BALL WAS NOT INTENDED FOR HIM. BY THE TIME HE TOUCHED THE BALL HE WAS NOT OFFSIDE. HE HAD RAN QUITE A DISTANCE FROM HIS INITIAL POINT TOGETHER WITH FRANCE DEFENDERS WHO WERE AHEAD OF HIM. AND ALSO REMEMBER THAT MESSI SCORED HIS GOAL AFTER THE KEEPER PUSHED THE BALL AWAY INTO MESSIS DIRECTION. AT THAT POINT THE GOAL HAD TO STAND.

Ppl like you need to stop talking ball

Argentine said “win is win, loser is explain”
And they are explaining their rigged 😅

Big ass

You guys forgetting the 2nd penatly shouldnt never given to France as the france player punch the ball (received from corner kick) and then it went to Mbappe. See the replay.

There was literally identical situation with Grizmann goal. Ant it was canceled.

this channel trash doesnt know anything about football.. just go watch cricket bro

pls dont tell me you're stupid..

richarlison pressed the ball, messi didn't interfere in the buildup

You could be a good refreee 🗿🗿💔

I will make it clear for you... The pass was received by martinez, if the defender who is chasing messi was actually chasing martinez and messi blocked the defender from doing that, then it would have been an involvement in the buildup... But in this case, the defender is chasing Messi, Messi didn't block him from reaching the ball, He didn't even block the view... He gets involved only after the pass was received... I hope you understood... If you still think you are right, you are either a frustrated hater, or a guy who just wants negative publicity for your videos, or an idiot

Edit: just checked your channel, frustrated hater it is😂

Richalarlison ran back to interfere with play thst lead to Vinicius getting the ball if Richarlison ran back with pressuring the ball then Vini got his goal

Never speak on football ever again, thanks 😂

Thanks to the explanations in the comment section, i won't explain more
CRY HARDER

You are so right, it was offside by a finger. This world cup was built to give to Messi

😂😂😂😂😂 Hahaha 🤣🤣🤣🤣 What a funny moment 🤣🤣 Suiiiii fan spotted 😂🤣 Read the offside rules before posting shit 🤣😂 still pendu fans can't digest messi's wc victory 😂🤣

bloody fool

You are a fool

Bro don’t know the rules

Bro you are making your happiness😂

Passive offside like this is allowed since the rule changes back in '90 something.... Messi returned to onside before receiving the ball from Martinez....I'd say that Richardson offside was incorrectly called, that was the mistake

He pay the ref thats why he give him the goal

He is stupid guys leave him alone go commenate basketball or some other sport u understand

Pessi was 100% offside and fuckmaria's penalty is really shame on football world. Without referee arg didn’t won wc. The theif team

decime q no entendes un carajo de futbol sin decirme q no entendes un carajo de futbol

If you watch the game and put it at the time that that incident happened the announcer says "messi's way offside that doesn't matter"

Pov: you have no brain: (or you haven’t watched football)

(Ps: Messi didn’t receive the pass…)

😂😂😂 learn the rules

There is no reason for a video like this to exist. If you don't know the rules then that's on you.

Salt.....

he started making videos of football because he got the most videos in that content. sorry football in my country got hyped up recently

he's a cricket fan go and check out his videos he started making videos of football recently lawra mother chd kitna saal sai football dekh raha hai tu

Dumb penaldo fanboy don't know basic offside rule

smartest ronakdo fan

Richarlison made a run to try and play the ball, it's crystal clear, it's obvious you don't understand what passive play is in football.
Although in this case Richarlison didn't benefit that much from the offside position, but it's still offside.

Cope. Stop crying, its over. ⭐⭐⭐

100 % offside

ajajaj segui llorando bobo