Комментарии:
26% hahahaha
ОтветитьSmarmy witness. He starts off so terribly.
If you failed an exam which you needed for your profession, you would remember. Why downplay that?
If it wasn't important, why retake that, then claim a vague memory of it?
And -- the guy doesn't read a footnote. Not a fan of studying. No wonder he flunked.
This guy just proved what the CW is accusing KR of! Amazing cross!
ОтветитьThis Special Prosecutor does get on my list of people I wouldn't mind seeing in person, on a sweet day!
ОтветитьI don’t like Karen Read, I think she is narcissistic. But with the evidence, I cannot see how the injuries on John O’Keefe and the damage to the SUV correlate… And the investigation and even just the entire handling of the case by the prosecution are very unfair. I think this “Free Karen Read” thing is too much, and people should look for the real killer, the one who bashed the back of John O’Keefe’s head.
ОтветитьLove Hank ❤❤✊👏👏👏
ОтветитьIt looks to me from his low budget equipment, the analysis of this one should not be taken into account.
ОтветитьWhy are most prosecutors so unlikable? This guy is skilled at being unlikable. He’s killing it.
ОтветитьHank is the smartest most accurate Prosecutor I have seen.
ОтветитьDo you think Brennan knows how ridiculous he sounds? Why didn't you use a 1 lb leg, 17lb arm or a 500 lb log? Do you know the math? What's a calculator? So you don't know if I know how to use a calculator? Is that your testimony? You don't want to answer that question for me? Isn't that the weight and mass vs velocity? 😅
ОтветитьExcellent attorney !
ОтветитьWolfe the lying wolf. Guilty. Great work cowards
ОтветитьAnyone on here who thinks that Wolfe just proved the prosecution theory needs to go back to school and re-learn physics. He wanted a straight yes or no answer, but doesn't want to listen to the actual truth. I hope we have some engineers or physicists in the jury.
ОтветитьIf there is no contact why would he say where the body landed
ОтветитьHank trying to argue physics is hysterical. Anyone who has taken physics , mechanics or material, or Quantum mechanics will find this ridiculous.
ОтветитьThe smoking gun=
Red plastic on tail light was virtually intact and clearly VISIBLE on VIDEO when loaded on tow truck! AFTER police photos taken at Sally Port....the Red plastic was GONE......but magically appeared sprinkled like fairy dust over Mr.O'keef's body! = Not Guilty....
Although this witness is nice, he is evasive. He is trying to talk his way out of Hank's questions. He is not unbiased. He is totally biased. I hope the jury sees this....based on this evasiveness, it is 100% not a good/closing witness for the defense. Case closed. Another fact. This witness is very vague when Hank is asking him but convincingly mathematically precise when explaining his own theory. Quite telling. I hope the jury isn't full of young, drooling women - drooling over this paid witness. He has skin in this game.
ОтветитьWolfe is one tough cookie
ОтветитьAll my respect to dr. Wolfe 🫡🙌 very hard to be attacked like that without becoming defensive or rude 🤦♀️I can’t stand Hanky 😡😡😡 plus, judge Bev letting him do or say whatever he wants 🤷♀️🤷♀️🤷♀️WTF?
ОтветитьThis witness was terrible for the Defense and obviously biased and helped the CW’s case. Rescue Randy (lol) shows what happened to JO. Thanks for that Wolfe. Top job 👍
ОтветитьWhat??? This guy said you wouldn't want to know the POINT OF IMPACT. He said he doesn't think it would be helpful. Well, I see why he failed his test.
ОтветитьBut it's ok for Higgins Albert go get rid of phones
Jen to delete messages and Google searchs that ARE incriminating to them . Giv me a break this case is a joke . Bev you are a joke lock them all up
Hank is trying to convince the jury that his expert was better with M. Blue paint 🤭🤭🤭
ОтветитьProsecutor Hank Brennan is about the best I’ve ever heard.
ОтветитьThrowing a cocktail glass at the taillight is consistent with the damage but hitting a 6’1”, 215 lbs man is not consistent?!? Yeah ok Dr. Wolfe. PAID HACK
ОтветитьThe defense clearly proved that a 9 pound arm, hanging by ropes, could demolish a taillight
ОтветитьLol😂😂
ОтветитьHe's BS the federal government investigation John was not beaten to death. And the Albert's and McCabe and Kerry Roberts and Higgins and their children have been cleared. I hope the Okeefe family sues the hell out of this so called expert.
I don't think a civil judge is going to be happy with him
As he is on the Free Karen Reed movement page and his wife to.
Using 150 lb 5 7 manakin on a rope and a arm on a rope. As qualified expert. A civil judge will think much differently
Who's going to be laughing Dr Wolf
ОтветитьThe judge and Brennan too dumb to understand he was answering the question when Brennan was asking 'you don't want to know where the body was when impacted?' He is saying, the damage to the body and the vehicle prove there was no impact so why would anyone care where he was standing because he wasn't impacted. If the study first shows there was no way the car dmg could have been caused by his arm at those speeds with that damage to his arm, then there is no reason to know where he was standing because he wasn't hit....
ОтветитьHe must not be doing anything with the DOD cause they use signal
ОтветитьHe's lying
ОтветитьUnbelievable this guy is full of BS
ОтветитьBrennan is smart he's a professor of law.
He's got more integrity than any of the defense attorneys. And a great reputation.
This guy is a blatantly fing liar. Doesn't know his wife is on the Free Karen Reed movement page. BS liar
ОтветитьHe had to re-do a part of his certification … Hank called him out .. and expert downplays it as elementary test .. and wasn’t sure if he had to retake the practical part .. oh but we should trust this guy …
ОтветитьHanky panky made me chuckle so much 😅pure comedy gold 😂
ОтветитьHey, thanks for proving the CW's case, ARCCA! (Note how the strike did NOT include John's legs or torso, hence "No broken legs", etc.)
ОтветитьThe witness is breathing into the microphone and it's annoying
ОтветитьThis is so entertaining
ОтветитьHank Brennan masterfully schooled this witness, and the Rescue Randy video proved the CW case. It was a joy to watch because the truth came out.
ОтветитьThis witness is such a snake.
ОтветитьSo the majority of the commentors here trust a blue-man's 6th grade science project over science and a common sense? 📝 GOT IT.
ОтветитьHanky wants to be AJ and Alessi so bad. He is awful.
ОтветитьWolfe said he didn't have any close family with interest/involement in the case. Yet his wife is part of the Free Karen movement? Shouldn't he be charged with perjury for lying under oath?
ОтветитьBrennan what a class act, intelligent, and a gentleman!!
Love his cross-examinations!!
How does Brennan get a pass with the all the stunts he seemingly gets away with and so obvious with the blessings with the Judge. She is obvious in her rulings. How does she get away with all of her bias rulings??? She reminds me of someone who needs a drink and can’t wait to get home for a drink.
ОтветитьFYI, the claim isn’t that an arm can’t break a taillight. The claim is that an arm can’t break a taillight and only sustain the injuries JOK had
Ответить