Einstein's Revolution: Crash Course History of Science #32

Einstein's Revolution: Crash Course History of Science #32

CrashCourse

5 лет назад

330,288 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@meintte
@meintte - 08.01.2019 01:16

Sorry to be nitpicky, but Einstein didn't study at the university of Zurich. He studied at the federal polytechnic school of Zurich, which is today known as ETH Zurich. The university of Zurich is a separate university. But they are next to each other... So close but not quite

Ответить
@heyarnold04
@heyarnold04 - 27.08.2023 15:46

Watching this after Oppenheimer 😮

Ответить
@vaxen805
@vaxen805 - 23.06.2023 01:22

Eisenstein was a plagiarist

Ответить
@NosaBourdy
@NosaBourdy - 13.06.2020 03:04

Nice work, Einstein.

Ответить
@NikitaSamourai
@NikitaSamourai - 28.04.2020 15:15

i felt very cold during this video but then I realized I was just having INTENSE GOOSEBUMPS


NEWTONIAN IDEAS OVERTHROWN 🤯🤯🤯🤯

Ответить
@chrisp5095
@chrisp5095 - 20.04.2020 07:36

Einstein wasn't very smart, his girlfriend was the genius, but women didn't publish papers then, so Albert did

Ответить
@WingDiamond
@WingDiamond - 05.04.2020 22:07

Do Space Pirates make you walk the "Max Plank"? 😅

Ответить
@holyinquisition8895
@holyinquisition8895 - 30.03.2020 15:55

e

Ответить
@mexicanchanclas2737
@mexicanchanclas2737 - 28.03.2020 04:48

Hi...

Ответить
@johnmelancon8284
@johnmelancon8284 - 10.02.2020 16:52

... And we skipped Fr. Lematire... Yet another unsung priest and Father of the Big Bang.

Ответить
@se7187
@se7187 - 07.12.2019 18:03

"schrödinjer"... yea... he is...

Ответить
@dylanparker130
@dylanparker130 - 17.11.2019 04:51

gregor mendel would have made a better reference point than charles darwin

Ответить
@mattisvov
@mattisvov - 17.10.2019 19:48

"There where physics before Einstein, in the same way that there was biology before Darwin."

Pure poetry.

Ответить
@SourLemonsOfficial
@SourLemonsOfficial - 08.10.2019 19:23

Hank: god didn't just make, I don't know, a howling void.


Me: Yes he did. it's called the internet

Ответить
@lindavilmaole5003
@lindavilmaole5003 - 27.09.2019 05:27

Part of the Mcihelson Morley Experiment was to answer the question regarding the existence of an ether. JJ Thomson, Marie Curie, Ernest Rutherford independently made discoveries regarding the particles from the atom and from the nucleus that made them the stars of the season in the field of Physics. Later the names of Becquerel, Hertz, Planck joined the list and soon after, Albert Einstein shook the world with his new theory regarding relativity.

Ответить
@db197529
@db197529 - 19.08.2019 16:44

Einstein's role to the development of Quantum Mechanics was crucial!! More than any other and certainly more than Plank and Bohr. 1. In 1905, Einstein proposed the existence of the photon, an elementary particle associated with electromagnetic radiation (light), which was the foundation of quantum theory. 2. In 1907 and again in 1911, Einstein developed the first quantum theory of specific heats by generalizing Planck's law. 3. In 1918, Einstein developed a general theory of the process by which atoms emit and absorb electromagnetic radiation (his A and B coefficients), which is the basis of lasers (stimulated emission) and shaped the development of modern quantum electrodynamics, the best-validated physical theory at present. 4. In 1924, together with Satyendra Nath Bose, Einstein developed the theory of Bose–Einstein statistics and Bose–Einstein condensates, which form the basis for superfluidity, superconductivity, and other phenomena. 5. Even His criticism on Quantum Mechanics was beneficial for us since he pointed out things about QM that others couldn't see, like quantum entanglement (spooky action at a disctance). In 1935, together with Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen, Einstein put forward what is now known as the EPR paradox, and argued that the quantum-mechanical wave function must be an incomplete description of the physical world. For those who are interested in this, I suggest this article: Einstein’s Contributions to Quantum Theory∗
Norbert Straumann
Institute for Theoretical Physics
University of Zurich, Switzerland ¨
February 2, 2008

Ответить
@beth8775
@beth8775 - 25.07.2019 21:32

I like that quote about our tech advances being comparable to an axe in the hands of a psychopath. Very true.

Ответить
@benquinney2
@benquinney2 - 01.06.2019 00:38

What wrong with living in Germany?

Ответить
@benquinney2
@benquinney2 - 01.06.2019 00:30

Significant digit

Ответить
@benquinney2
@benquinney2 - 01.06.2019 00:29

The last decimal point

Ответить
@otiebrown9999
@otiebrown9999 - 30.05.2019 18:47

Einstein could not get a job - because he pissed off his professors. They would not write recommendations for the poor guy.
Shock: 4 years of COLLEGE, no Ph.d.!

Ответить
@nikitaamien404
@nikitaamien404 - 27.05.2019 23:36

Heisenberg gets pulled over by a policeman. The policeman says, “Sir, are you aware you were going 100 in an 80 zone?” Heisenberg replies, “Great! Now I don’t know where I am!”

Ответить
@MrGuitarguru95
@MrGuitarguru95 - 07.05.2019 09:18

Good video, only missed one thing: Nikola Tesla proved the existence of the aether.


Changes argument to:
1. Michelson-Morley Interferometer Experiment of 1887 proves that the heliocentric, spherical model is inconsistent with the existence of the aether
2. Einstein explains away the aether over the course of 3 papers published from 1905-1915
3. Tesla (along with Maxwell and Faraday) proved that Einstein's musings are not rooted in proven experimentation like that done by the fathers of the modern electrical grid who engineered several components which require the aether to function at all
C. If the aether can be proven to exist, then the Earth is actually a Flat Motionless Geocentric Disk with a Dome on top that rotates around the Earth (with the 7 planets of the solar system all moving independent of the dome/star movement--in Latin "planet" means "moving star")


This is by far the most conclusive proof which nullifies the existence of the globe model. The only other theory that exists which includes both an aether and the globe in light of Michelson-Morley is the "ether drag" theory which can be safely dismissed using the findings from G.B. Airy's 1871 experiment nicknamed "Airy's Failure" (notice how every experiment that proves something related to the classical models of the world like geocentricism is labeled a "failure" by mainstream academia rather than unbiasedly considered as a compelling piece of evidence to the contrary on an unsettled issue). In Airy's Failure, stellar aberration is analyzed to inadvertently prove it is the universe which revolves around the Earth, not the Earth spiraling through the infinite ever expanding vacuum of space. Using this evidence, we can conclusively dismiss the theory of "ether drag" and confirm that the Earth is in actuality a Flat Motionless Geocentric Disk with a rotating dome affixed above it.


The magnetic poles are structured like that of a disk magnet, not like that of a magnet that does not actually exist in nature (iron rod on axis of suspended spinning sphere). Water always fills a container and finds its level after settling; that is to say that water fills the container to form a flat perfectly level surface after settling. Using this fact, the oceans would make far more sense if they behaved like water in every other circumstance, and the water that composed them found its level rather than curving to stick to a spinning sphere. Look up what happens to a tennis ball if you spin it quickly, does the water stay attached? Gravity is identified as the force that pulls everything into the oblate spheroid that is earth, and despite not being strong enough to overcome the laws of density and buoyancy which govern the type of objects to sink and rise relative to others (allows balloon to float away bc it is less dense, and for us to float to top of pool of water bc we are less dense while brick falls to the bottom because it is more dense than both water and air), it is still somehow able to keep all of the water from flying off the spinning ball that is rotating at 3x the speed of sound. Water doesn't even pull and collect around the equator more than the rest of the ball like one would expect as a result of the centrifugal divergent force acting upon the water...somehow gravity is just so strong it can keep everything in place........well everything but that balloon.


Fact check everything I've said. I dare you.

Ответить
@jairosoft
@jairosoft - 01.05.2019 01:24

Wonderful! You inspire me to learn more.

Ответить
@tombouie
@tombouie - 30.04.2019 03:32

Hey, where are the BROWN eye glasses? I like those better.

Ответить
@armanke13
@armanke13 - 14.02.2019 09:46

Please keep going until the building of LHC

Ответить
@josephhargrove4319
@josephhargrove4319 - 06.02.2019 04:13

Who can forget the famous follow-on: E = m(a² + b²) ;-).

Ответить
@Miketrt
@Miketrt - 27.01.2019 17:18

is this greens brother or something?

Ответить
@jacksonbaker468
@jacksonbaker468 - 25.01.2019 01:17

HEY!!! new glasses!!!

Ответить
@brandon91191
@brandon91191 - 23.01.2019 16:21

Technically Einstein was a professor at the Institute of Advanced Study, not Princeton University per se, although he did teach lectures there.

Ответить
@brclb90
@brclb90 - 20.01.2019 02:32

been binge watching the videos
They finished :'( .
I was like WTF!
Then saw the time stamp.
Oh last video just 2 weeks ago.
Now waiting for the new videos.

Great work keep it up!

Ответить
@TheManOfSteel89
@TheManOfSteel89 - 19.01.2019 17:52

Einstein da GOAT

Ответить
@anthonyschroeder521
@anthonyschroeder521 - 18.01.2019 17:50

I don't want to be that guy... but both at the time and now a days Einstein gets too much attention and credit. Unfortunately, because he was immediately famous then as well, retroactive analysis cannot ignore the disproportionate impact he had at the time, thus perhaps perpetuating that mythos. Also, quantum physics isn't weird. Humans are weird for not getting it (and telling people it is weird and not something that they can understand/see as the real truth of the world doesn't help fix that paradigm). But that is a science education debate (like why it is quite arguably bad practice to teach students the 'octect rule').

Ответить
@isaiahsmith3199
@isaiahsmith3199 - 18.01.2019 08:00

Is there any way to come visit yall's studio in Montana? I'm a huge fan who lives in Mount vernon, WA.

Ответить
@md.abidhasan4005
@md.abidhasan4005 - 15.01.2019 16:58

stephen hawking the greatest scientist after Einstein

Ответить
@md.abidhasan4005
@md.abidhasan4005 - 15.01.2019 16:56

very good criticism

Ответить
@jacksontaylor290
@jacksontaylor290 - 15.01.2019 03:45

How did he figure all of this out, and how did it change everything so fast? Wasn't he pretty much a nobody in Europe when he published his thesises?

Ответить
@WindFireAllThatKindOfThing
@WindFireAllThatKindOfThing - 14.01.2019 22:28

Einstein was a bloody heretic.
Everyone knows that Mankind travels faster than light by traveling through the warp, nuzzled deep inside a Gellar field, guided by the holy light of the Astronomican.
In the grimdark equations of the math future, there are only more questions. There is no peace among the disciplines, only an eternity of impossible theory and dogmatic principles. And the laughter of thirsting scientists.
E=Blam^2

Ответить
@kylefernandes5311
@kylefernandes5311 - 14.01.2019 09:23

Aether

Ответить
@gabor6259
@gabor6259 - 13.01.2019 06:30

The pronunciation of Schrödinger is shrödinger, not shrodinjer.

Ответить
@knutholt3486
@knutholt3486 - 12.01.2019 22:04

Well, Einstein's view about QM my ultimately turn out to be right, but only with the cost that the speed of light may not be a limit for all types of happenings after all.

Ответить
@Shubamakabra
@Shubamakabra - 12.01.2019 16:02

Intro is WAY too loud ..

Ответить
@DontMockMySmock
@DontMockMySmock - 12.01.2019 03:46

You're very wrong about the part with the famous "God does not play dice" quote. Einstein was objecting to the idea that the position of a particle is truly random, and not governed by some deterministic process. The problem is that "uncertainty" sounds like "randomness," but that's really a misnomer. Uncertainty would be better called "spread-out-ness." Einstein was not objecting to this spread-out-ness; that kind of uncertainty is a property of waves and is present in classical theories like GR. The idea that Einstein is objecting to is the idea that the waves in question aren't "real" in themselves but instead represent probabilities of truly random (non-deterministic) outcomes, and in particular, the way of interpreting this randomness that became known as "the Copenhagen interpretation."

Ответить
@rafaguelfand6615
@rafaguelfand6615 - 11.01.2019 20:40

Tag yourself:
I'm the howling void.

Ответить
@maria-lz3he
@maria-lz3he - 10.01.2019 22:36

I watched all of this course in like two days, its so interesting! Thank u and i can’t wait to see more xoxo

Ответить