Einstein's Proof of E=mc²

Équations of Einstein its false

Clear as mud

This video was made 16 days after I was born

Could there be a geometrical aspect to Einstein’s equation, E=MC² energy equals mass times the speed of light squared? The C squared can represent light radiating out in every direction forming a sphere 4πr². We have square the radius r² of the sphere because the process is relative to the spherical surface. The interior of the sphere is naturally three-dimensional forming the three dimensions of our everyday life. If we place the Lorentz contraction ˠ of space and time ∆E ∆t ≥ h/2π between the energy ∆E and mass ∆M we link time within the process. The surface of the sphere can form a boundary condition or manifold for the process of energy exchange that forms our ever-changing world. We measure this process as a ‘period of time’ with the atoms of the periodic table being standing waves in time. The spontaneous absorption and emission of light photon ∆E=hf energy is forming potential photon energy into the kinetic energy of electrons. Kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy is the energy of what is actually happening. An uncertain ∆×∆pᵪ≥h/4π probabilistic future is continuously coming into existence with the exchange of photon energy.

I kinda see this text (e=mc2) in the road sign earlier in the car and also in my classroom (ignore my account its my dad's account)

PSUEDO SCIENCE
E=MC² has never been proved .
Einstein destroyed physics, and idiots like this who think they are scientists while claiming a hypothetical mental process is PROOF of anything, nevermind proof of whst Energy is .

E=mc2 can be extended on space: E=mc2=(Pp-Pc)V

What am I doing here?😮

Yea because cats emit so much energy and light so they have to nap all the time..

The Doppler Effect for light exists. However, light at different wavelengths has different energies. This piece was NOT explained.

How did you cancel out everything at the end?

i don't understand how he came to the conclusion of C squared, like why is it light x light? how did he come to that conclusion?

may be it is traveling to Schrodinger box other side

I prefer the thought experiment method used by Einstein himself (ie. which used compliance with Newton's 2nd law and conservation of momentum and not much maths used in that method).

I was hoping to understand why the speed of light squared should be significant. I would expect it just to be a random huge number of no interest.

E=mc2 is not Einstein's prediction. I wish people would stop distortion history.
E=mc2 was published a few years earlier by an Italian industrialist called Olinto De Pretto, an industrialist from Vicenza, he published the equation E=mc2 in a scientific magazine, Atte, in 1903

Why speed of light square?

What units? Is mass in kg, tons, pounds ...? Is c in miles per second or in kilometers?

Did that car know what it was getting into?

The origin of the Doppler effect energy is a little hard to find but I suspect it relates to the formula for the Transverse Doppler Effect rather than the ones for objects moving directly towards or away from each other.

Why is the kinetic energy of the cat different wheter we stay and then go or wheter we go and then observe?

can you explain faster than the video??

bad

E=mc2 is bullshit cause . Photons have energy but no mass so what would the value of a single photon have

Wow 😂 my "extremely smart" tutor told me there's no proof it just is...years later this is what I find

it's all shleemypants's fault

its quite amazing to me how einstein managed to conjure up the example that would result in him equating the velocity loss to the energy loss. and then equating velocity back to mass. it really makes it look so simple.

yes, you will calculate that the cat has kinetic energy when you randomly see it in space (THIS IS A JOKE)))

It’s not fair cats can breathe in space and I can’t

You realize , that in fact, the correct equation shall be ;

E ; mc^ii

Right

I mean.. you all realize that I know more than you ever will, right? Y’all physicist shit are gay dawg

But why does the cat emit light

This is the actual derivation! Let me simplify!

A) Imagine the cat had some energy to begin with - say 10 units! Let’s say it emits two photons of equal energy (1 unit) in opposite directions. What’s the new Cats energy? It must be 8 units. Cool? Now, jump into a rocket that your friend is riding. What’s the energy of the cat as you see from the rocket?

If the rocket is moving at speed v, then from the rocket, you see the cat move in the opposite direction with speed v. So, the cats final energy must be 8 + 0.5 mv2 ——-(1)

But, wait your friend also does the same calculation. He has been in the rocket from before the cat emitted the photons. So, let’s see what he sees
He sees the cats initial energy to be 10+ 0.5mv2. Then he sees the cat emitting the two photons. Each with energy 1, right? WRONG! This time, one of the photons will be red shifted (lower energy than 1) and the other blue shifted (higher energy than 1). But if you add up. Their effects don’t cancel out. This is the key. The total energy is now more than 2. This extra energy happens to be ~ v2/2c2. And so your friend sees the cats final energy to be 8 + 0.5mv2 - v2/2c2 ——-(2)

But, this is silly. They both must be the same. Now if you equate the two, you will get the rest of the derivation!

As for how the cat got going so fast, look at how cars zoom around at night. Then remember that it's always night in space.

i dont want this in life

aight, but why the cat be emitting light tho

What is the meaning of e equals m c square. If you take any energy and spread over c cross c then the mass content of the fabric is m. Higher energy means higher mass content within c square region. Mass means trap holes in the fabric of space time. Time is the gap factor of space. Any space time fabric can have only one time. Associated other times are curvatures or relative time.

Can anyone help me with why the Doppler effect eqñ

I literally dont fucking getting it😭😭😭😭😭😭😭

I appreciate you using a cat to make it easier to understand but im now even more confused

Title: "Energy, Mass, and Light: An Exploration of Fundamental Concepts"

Abstract: This paper explores fundamental concepts related to energy, mass, and the nature of light. It delves into the famous equation E=mc^2 and its implications, discussing the energy-mass equivalence principle. Additionally, it examines the concept of light as both wave and particle, discussing its energy, frequency, and speed. The paper also addresses the idea of photons having mass and explores the relationship between energy, frequency, and mass in the context of light.

Introduction: The concept of energy-mass equivalence, as encapsulated by Einstein's equation E=mc^2, is a fundamental principle in modern physics. It states that energy (E) and mass (m) are interchangeable, with the speed of light (c) acting as the conversion factor. This equation has profound implications for our understanding of the universe.

Section 1: E=mc^2

E=mc^2 explains the relationship between energy, mass, and the speed of light.
Mass can be converted into energy and vice versa.
Practical applications and implications include nuclear energy and the mass-defect in chemical reactions.

Section 2: The Nature of Light

Light exhibits both wave-like and particle-like behaviors.
As a wave, light is characterized by its frequency (f) and wavelength (λ).
As a particle, light is composed of photons, carrying energy and exhibiting mass-energy equivalence.

Section 3: Photons and Mass

Photons are associated with a tiny amount of mass due to their energy content.
Calculations for the mass of photons yield extremely small values.

Section 4: Energy, Frequency, and Mass

The relationship between energy, frequency, and mass in the context of light is explored.
The equation E=hf (where h is Planck's constant) is discussed in relation to E=mc^2.

Key Values and Concepts:

Speed of light (c) = 299,792,458 meters per second.
Planck's constant (h) = 6.62607015 x 10^-34 Joule seconds (approximately).

List of Colors and Corresponding Frequencies:

Red Light: Wavelength Range: 620 nm to 750 nm, Frequency Range: 400 THz to 483 THz
Orange Light: Wavelength Range: 590 nm to 620 nm, Frequency Range: 483 THz to 508 THz
Yellow Light: Wavelength Range: 570 nm to 590 nm, Frequency Range: 508 THz to 526 THz
Green Light: Wavelength Range: 495 nm to 570 nm, Frequency Range: 526 THz to 606 THz
Blue Light: Wavelength Range: 450 nm to 495 nm, Frequency Range: 606 THz to 668 THz
Violet Light: Wavelength Range: 380 nm to 450 nm, Frequency Range: 668 THz to 789 THz

Mass of Photons for Each Color (based on energy content):

Red Light: Approximately 5.5217 x 10^-36 kilograms
Orange Light: Approximately 4.4897 x 10^-36 kilograms
Yellow Light: Approximately 3.6565 x 10^-36 kilograms
Green Light: Approximately 2.6649 x 10^-36 kilograms
Blue Light: Approximately 1.6783 x 10^-36 kilograms
Violet Light: Approximately 9.2951 x 10^-37 kilograms

Conversion Calculations:

Conversion of energy to mass: Using E=mc^2, mass (m) can be calculated by dividing energy (E) by the speed of light squared (c^2).
Conversion of mass to energy: Using E=mc^2, energy (E) can be calculated by multiplying mass (m) by the speed of light squared (c^2).

Conclusion: This paper has provided an overview of fundamental concepts related to energy, mass, and light, emphasizing the interconnectedness of these concepts. It highlights the significance of E=mc^2 in understanding the conversion of mass into energy and the role of photons in carrying both energy and a minute amount of mass. Further research and exploration in these areas continue to deepen our understanding of the physical world.

Please note that this summary includes numerical values and lists of colors, frequencies, and corresponding masses, providing a quantitative aspect to the paper's content.

I just wonder what kind of people find these video helpful. BTW, Einstein didn't derive that theory. He stole it from Poincare.

not really helpful

These ideas created an illusion that hampers further understanding and focus on what is furthering scientific progress in space. I'll first go over why the conservation of mass principal was formed without a basis in reality.

First of all, it's a thought experiment by conjecture. It's so proximal that it has led to other predictions being correct in the field of physics reliably. The problem is that it dictates to us that emission of light is fixed and constant and brings rise to the time travel paradox and questions of causality which are completely fiction and by extension, this form of propaganda, while useful 100 years ago to help conceptualize advanced thinking, isn't as useful today. As generally people are able to function at capacities or levels where in Einsteins time were nearly non-existant by comparison. These ideas of '2D' '3D' and '4D' dimensional diagrams and thinking which gave rise to the idea of space time were important then. It's as if it's a language taught and then the most popular book is general relativity and most other physics explanations are derived from it. Problem is it has constraints on thought and hampers scientific progress and by the sake of argument the more realistically based theoretical and practical concepts are completely suppressed.

Emissions take more energy in the presence of the forces of acceleration and gravity itself. As in if you are too close to a gravitational body the chemistry properties of what will cause the particles to take on emission change. The same goes for the force of acceleration, they are cumulative and respective of the vectors of acceleration and gravity each. More acceleration = needing more energy to emit light. Don't forget the force of gravity that happens when you're not in an inertial frame any longer (on the planet or ground), it's in reverse as you're the least dense thing typically with the more dense things below you repelling or being stood on top of having no further room to fall and hold their structural integrity. Nuanced but necessary to explain. If Jesus walked on water, he understood this.

Because that is true, that means there is no theoretical limit on how fast things can move, simply how fast things can accelerate while maintaining the integrity of the atomic system that is the force of repulsion that keeps repulsion working. You could say that in a black hole that this repulsion breaks down, and you simply get the biggest form of the smallest form of what we already deal with in a particle in chemistry along the body of everything connected and together.

Dark energy, because matter is in fact inertial what happens when that speed of light is too fast or too slow, it either doesn't refract because it doesn't interact or it is overcome by the forces of gravity and falls into a helios or directly into a gravity well. As well as anything else that doesn't block visible light you can see. Accounts for the Dark Energy. Red and Blue shift is simply how we detect particles and is no different than any other emission such as refraction against a color on a wall, the electromagnetic interference applying acceleration on charged particles in the electron chemistry of the particle, the emission of light from the chemical structure of the particle which is a uniform 'star sheen'. That's why you have polarization.

Time Dilation, is simply a dimensional concept that older physicists used in order to communicate higher learning principals that are much more available today in the form of capacities and explanation and learning aids. Proximally correct black board math that more people can do today. Definitely more achieved in volume than quality, as typically what you're doing as a person in modern times is participating in your socio-economic activity which is education without regard to this mysticism which is why you have quantum mysticism.

Einstein none the less, absolutely brilliant and this physics followed in his footsteps. However when you take these physics principals starting with why would we do this?.. for sake of argument, it's problematic to teach Einsteins relativity... Einsteins relativity will never teach you this the following; you understand when you rotate an engine, allowing part of the mass of the engine to fall to the edge from center, have that mass of the engine kick off the spin of the engine, disconnect the tether and weld in the inertial frame and re-attach to the center of the engine, then pull the mass of the engine and the disconnected inertial part and pull together, you can get a single vector that takes energy and transfers it from the angular momentum built up through velocity directly to the linear momentum, with that kick stopping the spin and moving it to the linear velocity of the engine when the parts are pulled back together. You understand that the efficiency of this system is in line with the emission of the particle itself and are obtainable much more efficiently than combusting molecules that must hold repulsion in space. Without market viability for a slow engine the best way to get humanity on course is understanding, the slow engine with no limits, the physics that's not based on combustion and the release of energy, but the manipulation of the mass itself whilst conserving nearly all of the energy. What I've described has only 1 light profile. I do not need to give dimensions, that's up to the motor sport era of this engine age.

FuryOne's BattlePlanets
Ethan Sams' Space Engine

energy equals mass times the speed of light by itself

Now thaats call E=mc2

huh?