The Sun Disproves Flat Earth - Kaleb FE (Tiktok), It's Just Perspective!

A conspiracy theory should not involve subject matter that can be examined with ease, by many millions of independent witnesses. Kaleb FE has shot himself in the foot, by choosing one of the most childish conspiracies imaginable.

can't believe that there are still people like Caleb out there with such ridiculous claims. Honestly, i think they're just playing dumb just for views, likes, and even monetization.

Arguing with a flat earther is like talking to a brick wall

Fantastic work Jon Joe

Nicely done. That Caleb Flat Earth guy certainly has enthusiasm going for him. But sadly, no facts or logic.

None of your rebuttal was necessary. If you create a disc model of the 'flat Earth' you could show how absurd Caleb's argument is by showing where the sun would need to be relative to the model in order to remain the same size despite moving thousands of KMs.
Logically, it would be impossible to not illuminate any section of the planet.

We have time because of dilatation. We have dilatation because the earth is round.
End of story.

Their belief of a flat earth isn't even their worst trait for me. They all seem to be obnoxious without exception.

Wait, does that mean each planet has it's own sun? Then what the hell is a sun system?

Thank you for your service Sir! Keep it up!

Also if the Sun was local circling above a flat Earth, it would appear to move slower as it gets further away from the observer. But it doesn't. It moves (or appears to move) at a steady 15 degrees per hour, or 360 degrees per 24 hour aka a full rotation of the Earth.

New York has an OCEAN SUNRISE ... a few hours later, Hawaii has an OCEAN SUNRISE ... a few hours later, Japan has an OCEAN SUNRISE !! ... three minor facts are combined into ONE huge fact ... its 1,000,000% IMPOSSIBLE to have this on a flat earth !!

Whilst what he said with the whole further away makes the angular size change appear less dramatic, that still doesn't defeat the fact the sun literally doesn't change angular size, at all, and their whole claim is it gets to far and converges to dissappear, when you can literally see the sun hlf way over the horizon at full size, and continue to watch it go down with no angular size convergence lol

His YT channel seems to be gone.

This needs a lot more views.

Clearly you never see a sunset on a desert with less moisture water on the air where you dont have the magnification of the atmosphere , you people only rejoice on a lie

Actually, there are a couple of vids of the sun going away and fading out instead of setting. It has to be cool, dry, and clear to see this happen. I've seen the sun set in my deep west northwest during my Texas winter. At noon, it was in my deep south near Capricorn (where it should be on both models). However, it's a straight line on a ball. It's a circuit on a fe. Which explains why it didn't set in my deep southwest where Capricorn would be on a ball.

The sun merges into the horizon, causing it to "set". Pretty simple and basic fe 101. The sky is not completely transparent. So, as it goes into the sky soup, it will cause the sun to refract downward. The more moisture in the atmosphere, the more extreme the setting effect. It also causes the sun to be magnified the more moisture or humid the day.

Imagine still believing you are on a spinning ball and believing nasa cartoons.
Pathetic.

Very good debunking. you deserve more views!