10 Controversial Relics Associated With Jesus Christ

Did I just hear that the holy foreskin was given to him by an angel??? This is ludicrous

U r so wrong about the shroud do your homework before u day it is fake

Carbon dating is flawed in many ways. Not saying that is the case here. I had also read where it says the Shroud had some smoke or fire damage. Something like that I can’t remember. But if that was the care the carbon dating is irrelevant

Wasn’t the shroud of Turin transported from Constantinople by the Crusaders in 1204 after the sacking had taken place? How would this make it a 1260 piece then?

Ah yes the holy foreskin at last, an excellent addition to my collection

Lololol, i didnt know that Electricity is a blood. Imagine Magnet is bleeding 😂😅😁

Carbon dating is apparently inaccurate and I mean do you really think man could make a gadget that can tell you the age of something like wood, i doubt it,human pride.

So basically everything has been disproved and it’s all lies and fakes. Got it👍

In 2020, fragment of holy nail was found in Czechia. Our second(another is in Prague), and to shock of scientist it was in 2 boxes, one from apriximately reign of charles IV and 2nd from 4-5th century. Nobody knew it was there! For at least 500 years it was in its hiding place. Crazy story.

I live next to a church who displays the blood of Christ in south Germany.

This is what I don’t like about videos like this. In regards to the shroud, each lab did not come to the same conclusion. They came up with different dates because the sample that was taken was from a patch that was woven into the shroud. This explains why each lab got different results. But why was the ENEA report from 2010 not mentioned? This independent investigation proves the shroud cannot be fake and more recent dating techniques have shown the shroud to be from the time of Christ. If you don’t want to believe that is fine but why be dishonest?

Drink a 40oz bottle of beer before & after you watch this

The labs that did the carbon dating tests on the Shroud of Turin admitted in 2018 that it was unreliable. It has also been proven that it was part re-woven with new material and that part was the bit tested.

The Sudarion of Oviedo carbon-dating testing is also unreliable because of much handling prior to its final move to Spain.

If the crown of thorns is real they'd test the blood from it , an if it's real it'll show that it has only 23 chromosomes, just like the blood from the shroud of Turin

Very disrespectfully done. It'll never cease to amaze me how atheists get so high on arrogance. Self-soothing copium? Or just acting out

People are drawn to relics, like priest to little boys

I suggest everyone goes and studies the most recent videos and evidence related to the Shroud of Turin.
Only a fraction of the story - mostly 40 years old - was told here.

He has no idea what he is saying and no actual documentation or facts.

You're telling me that the king of a vast empire put what he believed to be the only "crown" ever worn by the "King of Kings" and most important figure in world history in hoc? How hard up would you need to be? And why didn't this other king just say "Yeah, you can keep the money"?

Whoa whoa whoa. People claim to have Christs foreskin? I have so many questions. Did you notice how they didn't refer to it by its Hebrew word? "The Holy Shmuck" doesn't give it the same gravitas i guess.

You have given a totally scientific insight. Your stances are to be read and heard. Have never seen any real artifacts in person. Thanks you enlightened.

Imagine drinking McDonald’s Sprite out of the Holy Grail.

None of which are real.

The shroud of turin has indeed indisputably been verified as of 2022; you are presenting incorrect 'facts' about the radio carbon dating because those three labs DID NOT come to the same conclusion and was flawed due to the history of the shroud itself and the numerous repairs its had thru its long history. Additionally its history has been confirmed and dated to the correct time period. The shroud, the tunic and the veil are verified to have been from the correct period and contain either matching DNA or blood type. Lastly to this day the image and how it got there no matter from what time period cannot be explained nor recreated.

It faith and myth 😊😊😊

REVELATION 13, As Corrected: "A Mark Is Placed On The Criminal At The Time Of Their-Crime & Can Only Be Removed After Their-Arrest, Their-Prosecution In A Nonviolent Court Of Law, & Their-Sentence Has Been Fulfilled." Saturday, April 20, 2024, AD, CE, & Common Era, 4:10 am, Eastern Standard Time.

Mio Signore mio Dio, Dio mio mio tutto........ nelle tue mani metto tutto,e tutti....... portale su' in Paradiso Hammen.....

The Shroud has been proven to be authentic.

The relics that are definitely authentic are the Shroud, which has passed scientific investigation; Its related relic, the Sudarium; and the Image of Edessa which was the Shroud folded several times so that only its face was seen.
The Veil of Veronica is a legend that was started when the Byzantines exported paintings on cloth of the Mandylion under the guise of "vera iconica" or "true icon," along with a new legend as to how the image on the Mandylion had been formed.
The Valencia Cup is very likely the cup of the last supper, but, unlike the Shroud and the Sudarium, scientific evidence cannot be extracted from this relic.

For nails they where simple nails not some fancy gold nails.

The Shroud of Turin was tested by the newest threads from a Middle Ages repair. The older ones have since been tested and it is from around the time of the crucifixion

Should have spent a few minutes longer on this video especially the grail.

It’s since been proven with new carbon dating that the shrouds actually is around 2000 years old

you need to update your info

It isn't a factual relic. It is nothing but bs.

The foreskin? Bro…. Wtf.

All of them are fake. They didn’t start looking for holy relics until the 3rd century and that stuff had long been scattered to the winds and forgotten. Imagine someone reading something about you 230-1000 years after you died and only then going to go look for your foreskin, a towel you supposedly used, a wrapping you were supposedly buried in, the torture device you were killed with, etc. And people are gullible enough to believe this stuff is real? They WANT to believe. They would never accept such scant evidence from any other religion. Or else they would accept the golden plates of Nephi that 12 people testified that they saw. Or any of the holy artifacts from Islam. But I bet they believe all of that is fake. Even though people were writing the Quran during Muhammad’s life and they had numerous copies shortly after he died. They still have some that are much younger in timespan from when they were written and when the version was copied. Go look into it in multiple religions. If you find yourself believing one set of stories and not any of the others, then you should really consider trying to get some objectivity.

First of all, you have no clue that's his d.N a and you would have to have his d.N a to match up to it, the no

...z-z-z-z-z-z-z
....

you should do an updated video on the shroud.... sorry if you already have ha

I can just hear people going, keep that item it’s going to be priceless someday.😂😂

I doubt the crown of thorns was this nicely woven “crown” as people seem to think. It most likely was a jumbled up mess of thorns.

The cup of the last supper also referred to as the holy Grail wouldn't be beautiful and fancy it would have been made of wood or clay it was in a place not of major wealth so it would have been a common regular cup metal cups or something else of major value would not have been in that place

More recent carbon testing is quite challenging to the initial samples tested.. on the shroud that is….

You are wrong. About the shroud it was proved to be from the 1st century get your facts right

Fun Fact: The “Shroud of Turin” since has undergone a variety of different tests concluding that it definitely does date back to the 1st century.

The shroud of Turin has recent discoveries to it which at least disprove the disproval of its time of origin.

And not one relic is real

New Turin testing has been done since this video

Its hard for us too say its from the body of christ when the body of christ hasnt been found and the romans and jewish prosecutors preformed many crucifixions around that time similarly too how they killed christ