COMPARED mClassic v PhotoFast Gamer Pro 4k on Nintendo Switch. Which is better?

Just got the mclassic for my new switch. On 65in 4k tv. Looked pretty bad. After, looks glorious

The Mclassic Looks brighter & has a more smooth & sharper image seems like I'll be buying the Mclassic to upgrade my Nintendo switch definitely seems to be the better buy & cheaper & more affordable then the 4k Gamer Pro

what was the point ? which is better???

As mentioned I Have both but would 100% reckon end mClassic over 4kgamer pro even if you don’t get that true 4k output. The image just looks better with mClassic

I just got my 4kgamer have had the mClaassic since 2020. I combine them to get the best of both worlds! MClassic first then out to 4kgamer. 👌🏼

Cool

Mclassic isn't 4k best it does is 1440p which is supported by maybe 30% of T.Vs

I have both, Mclassic is way better 👍🏽

If you daisy chain an mcable, mclassic, and a 4k gaming pro you open a rift in space time and demons can come through

The waiting/loading screen in MarioKart 8 was the thing that shocked me the most and makes me hesitating about Marseille module predominance. The light gray sponsors logo didin't appeared on the screen while the 4k gaming pro show them with no problems! Looks like the 4k gaming pro is more stable than the Mclassic... but for all the rest, it's still much more difficult to definitely take a side... Mclassic colors are more attractive like the smooth effect on certain games, but the 4kgaming pro sharping features are surprisingly appealing!... It's mostly a question of preference and results are very relative depending which game you're playing...

m classic で変換した映像を4k gamerで変換してみてください。

Do you confirm that mClassic "only" upscale to 1440p (Switch, PS3, Wii U) and not to 4K? If i use a 4K Sony tv (like the new A95K), is it better to use 4K Gamer Pro in order to upscale to 4K resolution? thanks

I have mCable + mClassic and this combination is totally crazy, eliminating the dispersion of the pixels in the textures and smoothing "sawtooth" edges, so much better result than Gamer pro 4k or a solo mClassic also much expensive. Gamer pro 4k it does a very good job despite its less vivid colors, and worse contrast in its 100% mode becomes slightly better than mClassic "showing details that are not visible in 1080p"...as I commented mCable makes the difference.

What if you use both of them at the same time 🤔

honestly I think 4k gamer pro is okay, but for the 4k TV I have, it's worse than its inbuilt upscaler.
the mClassic is absolutely amazing for what it does, and for a 1080p or 1440p screen, it's definitely a must have in my opinion.

according to this video, the Mclassic wins, but have you put the pro 4k in its highest setting?

This doesn't like any "upscaling" is being done at all. It genuinely just looks like a sharpness filter. Definitely save your money on this

sir, I need you to combine the devices and post a video asap.

The PRO 4K makes everything a little blurry whereas the mClassic keeps everything sharp looking.

Mclassic it is. Thanks

Mclassic better

On which screen you made the comparison ?

Could you please combine both mclassic and 4k Gamer Pro in a mix chain to see whether it works or not?

So medium section looks like Mclassic upscaling, just without the color addition that Mclassic gives , but high is beautiful on 4k gamer pro

Can you use the two devices together to have the resolution + the AA ?

Your channel is so cool :D

I'm thinking of 720p (or lower native res) upscaled to 1080p through FSR and then, to 4K with the 4K Gamer Pro. That would be very useful for the Steam Deck. I didn't find any video testing this yet :)

Mclassic!!!

Nice to see the 4k gamer Pro has a more natural approach in colors, I can 100% agree that the mClassic has a high contrast which sure, some games bloom a lot more but isn't ideal, often find some UI is washed out as a result.

Appears, from my overall opinion on this video that the 4k gamer Pro looks to sharpen, retain natural contrast so things are more rounded off.

Honestly the actual benefit of these varies from what they're on, I find mClassic absolutely excels in games that use a lower p such as GTA Trilogy, Xenoblade. I assume the 4k Gamer Pro will be the same. Otherwise, its hard to say if the difference is that much nicer, mind you if the 4k gamer Pro is just as good, I'd say that would be the better choice due to the contrast issue and it not being adjustable / able to be turned off, to my knowledge on the mClassic.

Since I have mClassic I'm going to combine both once the 4k pro comes out lol.

The colours on the Mclassic look much more attractive at first glance, but the comparison shows that the Gamer Pro 4k actually has the more accurate colours to the default with improved visual fidelity. The colours on the Mclassic may pop more but they could end up being oversaturated to the point of appearing unnatural. BOTW popped more on the Mclassic but it just looked 'right' on the Gamer Pro 4k on the max setting.

Now daisy chain the mClassic + 4K Gamer Pro with 3 settings.

Mclassic definitely makes it brighter whereas I feel like the 4k pro makes it better quality

I've got the MCable and its shocking how much of a difference it makes. Even my wife who only playes animal crossing was amazed at the improvement. I'd say the Mclassic or the Mcable are well worth the money for any switch gamer

Ive never used any of these, but I am curious and want to purchase one. With that said, I honestly don’t know what to say; it seems like the mclassic is way better unless it’s the high setting on the 4K GamerPro

And still the Mclassic is better at colours, the other one mute them in a ugly way.

Hi