Tom Campbell Live interview on 1st experiment results 1st part

Sounds like the experiment needs to be done again without the 180 degrees phase shift to prove it is 100% correct, then nobody can say that it was because of the phase shift. What is the entangled pairs about? KISS. Also the way Tom explained it is a tad discombobulated, not so easy to understand.

Hmmm. I don't see any difference between Tom's "predictions" mentioned here and what the DSQE is showing and it is common knowledge, so, this is like no news. It's like Tom is celebrating and giving himself credit for something that he shouldn't.
So, it is still inconclusive if consciousness is a factor in removing interference.
The main thing is to check whether recorders influence the results, and still no news since 2018, 6 years ago when we had the Kickstarter.

Did I miss a video where Tom and the experimenters announced the final results of Experiment 1?

Lucrative scam! Congrats Tom!

Congrats, even if the "Physicalists" won't like the Outcome of the Experiment :-)

Hey Tom. Congrats, I know you wont read this but I really hope you are feeling some happiness ontop of good work.

Awesome.

Go get em Tom ......TRUTH finally

Love you Tom from India ❤❤❤

I suppose "regular" scientists will come up with their own explanations.

Congratulations. I hope you continue to press forward with the next experiments. So far so good 👍

What about saving the data long enough for one person(not Tom) to look at it then have them report what they saw? After they look at the saved data, they delete it and give their report. Do it multiple times with different people. This preserves uncertainty because now there's room for doubt about what the person is saying. To me room for doubt is a huge part of this existence. One person seeing something, I don't think, is seen as a fact by the system... maybe even a group, if the data is destroyed. Me not scientist :)

Why this experiment must be done with entangled pairs?

Here’s an idea I’d love for you to try:
Let ChatGPT handle the data collection from the detector, and then have ChatGPT discard it (do nothing with it) to see if you still get the same result.

If the result remains an interference pattern (which it should), you could then ask ChatGPT: "Please access and go over the content you handled previously so that you have the knowledge of which way it went and can answer me if I were to ask you." If this causes the waveform to collapse, we would need to reevaluate what a large language model truly is.

Please consider this suggestion.

What about an experiment where there are different consequences based on which slit a particle goes through?

If there are two slits there could be two triggers, one on each slit that then leads to different consequences depending on which slit was passed through and which trigger got triggered.

These consequences could be varied, from different lights being lit in the lab to simply different data being shown in a computer. But it needs to be some kind of tangible real world physical consequences that are based on which of the two slits was physically passed through.

Maybe there is already a similar experiment but from what I've heard about this subject there is no difference in the consequences based on which slit is passed through, either slit can lead to the same results. A consequential double slit experiment of some kind might be interesting.

Did you see Sabine Hossenfelder debunk the prior experiment that was similar with the phase shift? I don't think she was correct.

Tom's work is serving to confirm the philosophy of panpsychism. Panpsychism is closer to truth relative to physicalism, and thus worthy of pursuit..

Thank you Mr Campbell

Unfortunately I don't think the out of phase interference patterns are going to change many skeptical minds, as this type of thing is the Sean carroll/Sabina hossenfeld argument against delayed erasure being a thing. We need the results from the really long wires or something without entangled pairs!

Somehow the way you use the tone of your voice to advertise does not suit you at all. Lol

This is awesome. I found Tom in 2013 and immediately read My Big Toe, he was the launching pad for all of my spirituality, his theory has reconciled everything occult or esoteric I've ever come across. Tom work is truly fundamental to the person i am today i could never express my appreciation.

Congrats Tom! More to come.

Does this experiment eliminate retro-causality? (When the data is interpreted by consciousness some time in the future, the results are backwardly adjusted to support the illusion of reality.)
In other words, Reality is faking a back-story.

Excellent work team, let's hope getting this all written up, peer reviewed, and published opens up more funding opportunities 👍

Wow