Комментарии:
Do you think hypersonic passenger jets will become reality?
ОтветитьRich
ОтветитьWhy aren't they talking about the "technicals" of Concord or SR-71 as predecessors ?? 🤯
Or their choice of FUEL specific energy density . . . HC vs H2 ?
Physics, Engineering, & Math Skills seem weak from these videos . . . Hope they sober up & fly straight soon.
So, where is this effort today?
ОтветитьYou guys need to introduce a refrigeration system that runs throughout the body of the aircraft. Put priority to the main parts that will be experiencing the most drag. Once that refrigerant gets to max capacity, use that heat to preheat the fuel. This will help with controlling the temperature on the drag while creating better fuel efficiency.
ОтветитьI'm fairly sure the engine going fast enough is the issue--the materials will be.
ОтветитьBullshiit
ОтветитьThe design still has too much drag.
ОтветитьAutonomous!!! Wait. Wasn't there a movie about this? It didn't end well for humans.
ОтветитьSo they use ‘jil’ for programming .The JIL file is a Java in Lisp Source Code. Java in Lisp (jil) is a language for writing programs to run on the Java Virtual Machine (jvm).
ОтветитьAs a person that helps you save a ton on your car insurance, huge respect to these engineers
ОтветитьWhen will rockets have push and pull mechanics or is it all just push? Jets use push and pull mechanics, Jets go fast! Rockets go slow, have you seen a jet take-off? Compared to a rocket take-off? Jet fast, rocket slow!
ОтветитьI'm surprised there was zero mention of the Pratt & Whitney J58s that pushed Blackbird to it's record breaking feats back in the 60s.
ОтветитьSR-71 did it and did it better. That’s just an engine. That engine in this video is not designed to go that fast in the air. There are so many small details of the SR-71 that still boggle the mind. I hope they got their alloys right and got the same oils as well that burn at a higher temp or else this is a no go. Also, the tech they are using is not fuel efficient but neither was the SR 71. The SR 71 was efficient in the fact that it didn’t waste anything while in the air that including air if anyone knows what I mean.
ОтветитьAs a Russian, these clowns are sooo far behind our Tech 🤣
ОтветитьWOW, American arrogance personified, how the hell you can show clips of ra ra America aircraft/shuttle and, barely mention a sopersonic airliner in service for decades is beyond me. Oh i get it, british/French airliner never to be admitted too.
ОтветитьWhy the stupid music/noise. Detracts from the content
ОтветитьIn case the passengers didn’t fall asleep this will make them sleep
ОтветитьSoooooo V-TEC for planes ? Loo
ОтветитьBollocks... Skylon is Mach 5.5 and is sub orbital/orbital. Darpa tested the engines upto Mach 5.5 in Mar 2022.
ОтветитьWelcome to 1968
ОтветитьFascinating however this video doesn't show engines running or aircraft flight 😢
ОтветитьTechnology already exists.
ОтветитьI think Elon Musk paved the way for this company in the sense that his initial launch failures and now subsequent successes gives a use case for investment in innovation
Ответитьall in one engine dream big, land .....sea.......air......space....may be miracle
ОтветитьLooks like they want to turn a J85 into a mini version of the J58...🤔
Ответить6x faster, 36x more expensive to fly
ОтветитьOk. How could we invest in your company ??🔥🔥😂
ОтветитьSR 71 ?
ОтветитьIf they did not film that engine working they're crazy you know they filmed it so just in case if they did have a catastrophic failure they could go back in and say well huh okay we had a failure let's figure out where we went wrong and they sure as hell ain't going to be able to do that if they didn't film it so I call b***** on that when they said that they didn't film that practice shot on that engine I don't care who you are you don't think Elon musk doesn't film every last one of his shots how do you think he got so good on land of those rockets back on those pads he filmed it so if something went wrong he could go back and see what went wrong and so he can fix it so I don't believe that they didn't say they didn't film that I call BS on it
ОтветитьTitan (submersible) Season 2 coming soon......
Ответитьso this is all hypothetical
ОтветитьWhy not use solid fuel rockets to bridge Mach 2 to Mach 3?
ОтветитьWhat if you design two engine mach 5+another mach 5 engineer=equals speed of light
Ответить7.28...."we are a bunch of nerds that don't like to waste time in idle senseless chit chat... Amen
ОтветитьIf you look at the quarterhorse airframe you can tell its bogus and just a prop...
ОтветитьAs an American 🇺🇸 I respect th work y’all doing an keep it up , remember the SR 71 an 72 are already hear an you guys have kicked that tech into high gear an hey we need this tech to go USA wide an keep it due ourselves an not give it to any one , let um bust there chops like y’all did to make there on , if America would have done that yrs ago on many technologies we had we be better off as a country
ОтветитьWhat a total waste of existence. Thhese videos are like people being told they can be millionaires all they have to do is make a million dollars. The reality is its intangible, and even if achievable, then insignificant. the actual definition of a jerkoff content.
ОтветитьThe future is in your hands. Good luck!
ОтветитьForget about it , the Globalists will not allow citizens to travel anywhere in the near future . Only the Best people will be allowed to convert carbon fuels into transport energy.
ОтветитьU can't made a engine who goes beyond the speed of light
ОтветитьAs a person who's genuinely confused in the chat, what is going on here?!
ОтветитьThis looks like it is a copy of the British Hotol, a space plane in development for many years at Cranfield UK.
Ответить“Willing something into existence” is an irresponsible strategy. Especially when investors are fitting the bill.
ОтветитьInteresting video, just one small inconsistency, the condensation that you point to on the space shuttle and call a shock wave is actually the polar opposite, shock waves increase the temperature and pressure causing the air to be able to accept more humidity, so no condensation occurs there. What causes the condensation is an expansion fan behind sharp turns in aircraft fuselage where the pressure drastically drops, causing a decrease in temperature. This causes the air to be able to accept less water content and if the humidity is too high, it causes the condensate wave that we are observing here.
ОтветитьA dark matter drive is the way to go as opposed to a jet engine! Unfortunately nobody on Earth knows how to harness it yet.
ОтветитьWishing you all a Wonderful Winter Solstice, the reason for the season.
A traditional celebration dating back more than 5000 years ago where the Sun is literally rebirthed in the passageway of an ancient tomb, (where have you heard that before?)
The Grand Passage Tomb", a World Heritage site. Witness the rebirth in person.
A celebration of life and renewal, peace and camaraderie with food, song, dance, drink and good cheer.
Happy Holidays.
Let the Sunshine In...
Be Happy
thanks
เครื่องยนต์จะใช้เชื้อเพลิงน้อยลง 30%การเดินทางออกนอกวงโคจร
ОтветитьThe sr71 had that exact engine set up, so it's been done before, but of course, all that info is extremely classified and very well guarded by the government. That engine was produced by Lockheed Martin's Skunk Works Department. That very same Department designed and built the hypersonic plane at the beginning of Top Gun 2.
ОтветитьThis is cool, but what about the "HTV-2" that Lockeed was working on?
Ответить