SIX Biological Evidences for Creation - Pt.2

SIX Biological Evidences for Creation - Pt.2

60,420 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@Torby4096
@Torby4096 - 22.02.2024 19:34

He he... Somehow, I can't say Nathaniel Jensen without an Australian accent😊

Ответить
@mrazyone
@mrazyone - 26.02.2024 07:25

13028 years old

Ответить
@yibaibashimu6223
@yibaibashimu6223 - 26.02.2024 17:37

Sooooo... Does that mean I can play DNA, RNA, PROTEINS instead of rock paper scissors?
How fun!

Ответить
@stevesherman1743
@stevesherman1743 - 01.03.2024 22:12

Wait a minute ! Wouldn’t the Y chromosome genetically speaking go only back to Noah ? All of the Y chromosomes back to him and his sons. Right ?

Ответить
@stevesherman1743
@stevesherman1743 - 01.03.2024 22:36

Evolutionary Stasis = Animals reproduce after their own kinds

Ответить
@dominict9418
@dominict9418 - 03.03.2024 19:53

Such nonsense. There is a ton of proof of a very old planet. Look out the window at the sun. The light that you are seeing took 8 minutes to get to your eye. We know the speed of light and the distance to the sun. The rest is simple math. Now, look at a star. Using the same process you can prove that the light you are seeing came to you billions of years old. Everything easily falls into place. Geez, stop this nonsense.

Ответить
@larrymorrison1025
@larrymorrison1025 - 24.03.2024 05:04

Sometimes when I listen to creationists explaining their views on this subject of God created life. I am convinced that I hear them agreeing with the fact of evolution. THEY just need to reach farther back into the time scale.

Ответить
@moroniholm87
@moroniholm87 - 05.04.2024 14:13

DNA in cells never improves in offspring. The only way it might, would be from the other parent's DNA. That's my understanding.

Ответить
@samuelrodriguez9199
@samuelrodriguez9199 - 07.04.2024 20:41

God bless ICR and all creationist channels (YEC). God protect them and encourage them 🙏

Ответить
@avechristusrex31
@avechristusrex31 - 12.04.2024 16:02

Abiogenesis is a mathematical impossibility (anything beyond one in 10 to the 50th power is no longer a probability). The chances of a viable very basic protein forming by chance is estimated to be one in 10 to the 164th power. The number of atomic particles in the observable universe is 10 to the 80th power. Even if such a protein did form it is not life or anything infinitesimally close and would have been instantly destroyed by sun light (UV). So life by natural processes never even got started much less crawl out of the sea and develop arms and legs.
If everyone realised that every living thing is devolving and will go extinct due to genetic entropy, they would stop believing the lie of evolution. Evolution absolutely defies science. All we see is adaptation within kinds because the Creator built in regulatory mechanisms (eg. DNA sequences) so creatures could adapt to different environmental conditions.

Ответить
@avechristusrex31
@avechristusrex31 - 12.04.2024 16:09

Thank you to ICR for its great altruistic work in defending Truth. Would love to visit some day.

Ответить
@jonathanrussell1140
@jonathanrussell1140 - 19.04.2024 11:47

You don't need to pretend you're dumb 😂😂😂😂

Ответить
@jonathanrussell1140
@jonathanrussell1140 - 19.04.2024 11:48

You don't need to pretend you're dumb 😂😂😂😂

Ответить
@jonathanrussell1140
@jonathanrussell1140 - 19.04.2024 14:10

A groundhog day in the life of the "Institute of Creation Research"
Creationisticalist A "I've got this 2000 year old book"
Creationisticalist B "What is it"
Creationisticalist A "It's the holy bible - it's the infallible word of god"
Creationisticalist B "Did god write it?"
Creationisticalist A "Well, no, I don't think so because it's written in the 3rd person - by lots of different people - a long time after the events described"
Creationisticalist B "Oh, so it might be written by fallible humans?"
Creationistcalist A. "Well yes. But it says god is infallible"
Creationisticalist B "That's good enough for me. What does it say about the Grand Canyon?"
etc ...

Ответить
@michalp79
@michalp79 - 19.04.2024 16:46

They are lying. Just look at original studies.

Ответить
@jonathanrussell1140
@jonathanrussell1140 - 20.04.2024 03:39

Don't take a deeper dive Trey, you'll bang your head in the shallow end. Or maybe you already have...

Ответить
@wickedguppy3715
@wickedguppy3715 - 15.05.2024 05:34

No such thing as “evidences”.

Ответить
@rickcrume739
@rickcrume739 - 07.06.2024 05:27

the dr. voice is to soft

Ответить
@VaxtorT
@VaxtorT - 07.06.2024 19:36

I am in the YEC Camp.
What I have recently been challenged with is the argument that there is seemingly no Historic Break or evidence of the Flood occuring in the Historic Record at the proposed approximate date of the Biblical Flood....being at around 2500 BC.
My determination is that the Flood occurred at around 3000 BC and that the age of Creation is 6600 years old.

Ответить
@Astromancerguy
@Astromancerguy - 10.06.2024 10:12

evidence 4: Except both y-chromosomal Adam and mitochondrial Eve dates back about 200 kya.

evidence 5: Modern coelacanths have significant morphological differences from fossils.

evidence 6: No evidence given for the claim. Just restated the claim several times.

Ответить
@paulanderson7628
@paulanderson7628 - 11.06.2024 13:40

Are you using science to prove or disprove creation? Will you accept the evidence?

Ответить
@turtlegrams6582
@turtlegrams6582 - 11.07.2024 06:22

📯🕒⏳⌛; KJVB Isaiah 52: 14 Revelation 19: 13 John ALL Exodus 20: 1-18 Matthew 22: 36-40 } Isaiah 34: 4 Revelation 6: 14 Nahum 1:5, 6

Ответить
@saturn722
@saturn722 - 22.07.2024 11:00

What do we tell people when they ask why such important news is being withheld from the public? Our media is basically one sided when it comes to evolution and it’s really frustrating.

Ответить
@ann7318
@ann7318 - 13.08.2024 05:31

Q for the 'evolutionists'? For a BIG BANG to happen whenever, there HAD to be matter to make such an explosion. Where did that matter come from???? Also, the universe is not flying apart like it would from an explosion; it is in circular motions in all directions.

Ответить
@elizabethG633
@elizabethG633 - 19.08.2024 21:58

EXPELLED: No Intelligence allowed, with Ben Stein. Excellent documentary. I was in my late 40's when it came out.

Ответить
@Pay-It_Forward
@Pay-It_Forward - 02.09.2024 07:52

Zero evidence for young earth. Zero evidence for any supernatural claim of the bible. This video is a list of claims contrary to vetted scientific knowledge, without any evidence for its claims

Ответить
@adelinomorte7421
@adelinomorte7421 - 04.09.2024 06:17

**the opposite is also true, where is your evidence ? so I will win the quest with science as your evidence is just a point of faith.**

Ответить
@johnpritchard8946
@johnpritchard8946 - 08.09.2024 01:40

Oh dear. They talk about the Cambrian as if it's part of the history of a 6k year old earth. Unfortunately, the Cambrian came to an end 485 milliion years ago.

Ответить
@markkieran1004
@markkieran1004 - 11.09.2024 20:23

But if a god created it, why so complicated?

Ответить
@lunnsworld
@lunnsworld - 12.09.2024 08:06

Hello, great shows, I do have a question, your discussion and evidence is proof for me, but why...why I google the mitochondrial dna age, I see multiple site stations it is between 140,000 to 200,000 years, yet you are saying the mitochondrial eve is 6000 to 7000, why am I not seeing this data on my internet searches?

Ответить
@Norundithus
@Norundithus - 18.09.2024 19:38

Religion bends the facts of reality to map onto their truth. Science takes facts for what they are and allow them to point to truth. Keep it real. Religion keeps us in the dark ages when we treat holy books as 'literal'.

Ответить
@TomSanders-mi2bg
@TomSanders-mi2bg - 18.10.2024 23:57

Amazing rationalization to prove that earth is 6000 years old. Unbelievable

Ответить
@blank-964
@blank-964 - 07.12.2024 08:36

👍

Ответить
@gusward2568
@gusward2568 - 25.12.2024 04:07

That's all I have to say about that.

Ответить
@think1416
@think1416 - 07.01.2025 04:38

Evolutionists are like a flat earthers, if something doesn’t fit their model they finde an excuse and later correct their model

Ответить
@courag1
@courag1 - 05.02.2025 02:41

It is amazing information. Over ten years ago I concluded that evolution could not be how we came about and began studying good reasons to believe in biblical creation. It did wonders for my faith.

However I was80 lbs. overweight, arthritic, in and out of a wheelchair with pain and suffering it flashes of menopause. My youngest son had done Keto and it worked for him, but Keto made me horribly sick and my pain got much worse.

I cried out to God asking what was I doing wrong and He spoke in my head, “Haven’t you ever read the first chapter of Genesis?”, which of course I had. So I got out my Bible and was blown away at verse 1:29 … which states God made us to eat plants.

It was clear to me with our dogs that if they ate what was not their food, that it could make them very sick. Then I remembered my mother had gouty arthritis and this could be I inherited this from her. In which case God had given me to key to understand how to get well, and that was to transition to plant food and to stop eating all animal foods.

I did this over 3 weeks as we eat 3 meals a day, so I replaced a plant food meal for my meat meals. I gave up all dairy and eggs also, and I could then walk without so much pain and it stated me back on the road to health.

When weather permits, or I don’t have other commitments, I now walk 5 miles a day. I started small and just increased the distance over time. I lost 80 lbs., down from 200 lbs. to a size 4 in jeans, and weighing 120.

The food is very tasty and I never leave the table not feeling satisfied.

The Bible teaches that doers of the Word are blessed, and I can tell you I have lived the blessing. Also came normal blood pressure, my cholesterol came down to and my A1C is 4.8., so no type 2 Diabetes. My mother and sister both died of breast cancer, and I have no cancers of any kind.

No one thinks I look my age, get taken as being in my 40s sometimes. I have loads of energy and my mind is intact.

People counter that God allowed the eating of animals after the flood, but what was there to eat getting off the ark?

Thus does not mean He changed our bodies to be carnivores, but me can tolerate meat but it is not what our body’s design tells us, our teeth, our digestion, says that we should eat plants.

I got rid of another lifelong problem, I never am constipated.

I know now that I live best eating vegan, and I never regret my choice to obey the voice of the Lord. He heals in many ways.

Eating animals is not kindness to them. Doesn’t even the Old Testament declare “I desire MERCY and NOT SACRIFICE.”

The early church ate veg too, it is easy to understand that the Creator made all perfect and would fulfill His own teaching to be the perfect Lamb of God for us.

God provided HIMSELF, the sacrifice for sin.

Ответить
@jimanderson8602
@jimanderson8602 - 11.02.2025 02:08

If you use common sense, evolution doesn't exist. I use the term "common sense" loosely!

Ответить
@jimanderson8602
@jimanderson8602 - 11.02.2025 02:08

If you use common sense, evolution doesn't exist. I use the term "common sense" loosely!

Ответить
@vacaloca5575
@vacaloca5575 - 16.02.2025 06:06

All this may very well be true, but how do you explain that in one day (day 5) complex animals suddenly appear on earth, but even the reproduction and growth of these animals to become "moving animals teeming in the waters" would take at least a few days by any standards?

Ответить
@agapee77
@agapee77 - 20.03.2025 06:26

Amen!

Ответить
@j_esterline
@j_esterline - 29.03.2025 21:08

“They deliberately forget that God made the heavens long ago by the word of his command…” The Apostle Peter, 2 Peter 3:5a

Ответить
@gusward2568
@gusward2568 - 01.04.2025 06:08

Biblical time is so much more plausible. And more easily proven! ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤. Common sense is not so common anymore. But can Easily be found in God's Word. Preferably in the authorized KJV ❤❤❤. Just ask Jesus. Please read Evidence that Demands a Verdict! Don't be a fred 😂😂😂

Ответить
@gusward2568
@gusward2568 - 01.04.2025 06:10

Put the book...Evidence that Demands a Verdict on those tables please. ❤

Ответить
@gusward2568
@gusward2568 - 01.04.2025 06:13

In the beginning God made them Male and Female. It's just that simple. Whoops I told the truth 😂❤❤❤. Not an opinion. 😮

Ответить
@gusward2568
@gusward2568 - 01.04.2025 06:22

When Jesus returns creation will be restored. I believe most animals instinctively remember the creation. All you have to do is pay attention and you will observe this to be true. But what are the Sasquatch and UFO'S...Demons?...Nephlim?...not important. Look to Jesus. Everything going to be alright ❤

Ответить
@gusward2568
@gusward2568 - 01.04.2025 06:27

Nothing no where near to success. It was total abject FAILURE!!!😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂. but still they theorize as if they almost 😂😂😂😂😂

Ответить
@alomeli080
@alomeli080 - 06.04.2025 00:55

Where can I read the studies, papers, and reports mentioned?!

Links!?

Ответить
@bwtv147
@bwtv147 - 12.04.2025 20:07

When real geneticists examine human DNA they see a bottleneck of under 2,000
humans about 800,000-900,000 years ago.

Ответить
@CABryan
@CABryan - 01.05.2025 04:12

As a former evolutionist, my mind is blown. I'm already Christian, but I still believed all the "scientific facts".
Thank you, and God bless. ❤🙏✝

Ответить