4 Anti-Radiation Products Reviewed (By A Scientist)

4 Anti-Radiation Products Reviewed (By A Scientist)

CNA Insider

2 года назад

153,193 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@kamartaylor2902
@kamartaylor2902 - 01.01.2024 03:32

Guy pulled that thing out like it was in his pocket😅

Ответить
@Matthew8473
@Matthew8473 - 09.12.2023 05:12

This content is rich with transformative knowledge. Reading a book with similar themes guided my life's course. "A Life Unplugged: Reclaiming Reality in a Digital Age" by Theodore Blaze

Ответить
@BiiigBoss
@BiiigBoss - 03.12.2023 18:07

🎉🎉🎉 Good job

Ответить
@Holypikemanz
@Holypikemanz - 27.11.2023 01:54

Phone are "completely safe" according to the 5 year old femchild but then she instantly lists all the ways to avoid radiation (AND EMF) like avoiding the "safe" phone for hours.

Ответить
@JenMarco
@JenMarco - 05.11.2023 21:50

I bought a Lambs beanie hat and a emf reader and it didn’t change when I put the emf detector in it. I wrapped my cell phone in foil and called it and it didn’t ring. I wrapped it in the hat and it rang. That’s a scam company.

Ответить
@shaunmeyer420h
@shaunmeyer420h - 02.11.2023 17:30

Check out a company called "Lambs"

Ответить
@f.goossens8118
@f.goossens8118 - 02.11.2023 13:33

I don't own or use a phone. However, I am EMR sensitive, which means I get frequently (no pun there) sick from being around electric devices, including smart tech such as meters, even freezers and televisions. Once away from them my health improves dramatically. I've been this way all my life, even as a child I hated going to stores where fluorescent lights were because I'd walk under one and get immediately dizzy and nauseous. What concerns me, however, much more than our individual home equipment is the constant global bathing of us all in EMF. It's there. It's undeniable. And it's sadly rarely addressed. We live in the era of EMF smog pollution and nobody takes those of us trying to deal with it seriously.

Ответить
@Hochimilo
@Hochimilo - 26.10.2023 20:36

More Chinese music, less talking

Ответить
@brittanylonsdale5807
@brittanylonsdale5807 - 26.10.2023 00:25

Scientists... eye roll they didn't account for the fact emf products aren't meant to block signal but to neutralize your own resonance/frequency. There are SO many solid studies out there on this. Don't believe the skeptics who are out to disprove.

Ответить
@BeamFan_2023
@BeamFan_2023 - 18.10.2023 07:23

ooo what fancy thorium they are hiding

Ответить
@yapyh2872
@yapyh2872 - 10.10.2023 07:35

Lol, they don't even need a lab to test the effectiveness of these shielding items, all they need is some kitchen aluminum, make an envelope out of it, then put your phone in the aluminum envelope, then try to call your own phone if it doesn't connect, that means it works. And if it works then you can innovatively slide some aluminum sheets into different parts of devices that you suspect produces dangerous EMF.

Ответить
@TheElliement
@TheElliement - 05.10.2023 05:56

What is the brand of the beanie?

Ответить
@tjmns
@tjmns - 02.10.2023 01:26

i have tried wearing 2 leblok branded hoods (covers entire head except for eyes, nose and mouth) cell phone/wifi signal goes to 1 bar or no signal wrapped in 2 of these. Wearing just 1 (as a night cap) i noticed occasional better sleep. Wearing 2 at the same time instantly better sleep, much better, i couldn't believe it. in my experience two layers are much better than just 1. Guessing product quality matters also. Side note: sometimes i roll the 2 hoods up to eye-and-ear level with similar good results, imo there's something to shielding the brain while you sleep that helps with overall sleep and allows deep sleep again. I do not sell or link to these products. If even more sensitive - try using in combination with an entire bed/ceiling hanging emf-blocking-canopy also (and point a fan at your space for good air circulation). good luck.

Ответить
@Denver_____
@Denver_____ - 29.09.2023 20:56

I’m a save you 2.52 mins.
It doesn’t,
They just want your money.
You’re welcome

Ответить
@AjithVenkatesanBhuvana_
@AjithVenkatesanBhuvana_ - 21.09.2023 06:39

Can you please tell us how to protect our self from 5G cell phone tower radiations.

Ответить
@MysticCaravan
@MysticCaravan - 16.09.2023 17:04

LOL, you are measuring the wrong wavelengths

Ответить
@TLRB86
@TLRB86 - 09.09.2023 17:56

Why do ppl still think our government doesnt want to cause us harm when they allow all this harmful stuff and harmful ingredients,ect.. THAT btw, orger counties ban bc of how dangerous they are

Ответить
@ljscoaching6579
@ljscoaching6579 - 06.09.2023 18:10

This is not true and not honest!!! Your cell phones, Wifi and computers etc., all emit unsafe radiation levels. Look into it more as there are companies that harmonize the EMFs coming off your devices. You don't need to block the frequencies, but harmonize them for your health!

Ответить
@Mihalyofficial
@Mihalyofficial - 31.08.2023 05:12

"All these devices are within the safety limit"...having trouble seeing properly because of all the cash used to sponsor I see...

Ответить
@ZygoArachnid
@ZygoArachnid - 12.08.2023 00:58

Thanks!

Ответить
@Independent715
@Independent715 - 03.08.2023 07:41

They didn’t show you the phone

Ответить
@ellewilsonofficial
@ellewilsonofficial - 30.07.2023 09:29

How can this scientist say that the radiation omissions are in the safety zone. Who said this? How does she know what is safe for humans, really. Not by using some machine to confer with her colleagues. That is completely absurd. How can the information be trusted. Two years ago I bumped into a man at the beach who saw my pregnant assistant holding my phone to her head. He said... is she microwaving her brain. I asked what he meant and he shared his story. He had just recently returned home from Sydney where he had brain surgery to remove a tumor caused by his phone. The was his neurologists take.

The neurologist office was packed with sick people, including many children . He couldn't understand why this was not mentioned on the media - exposing to the world the harmful effects of these devices?

He mentioned that the neurologist told him when you have the phone or bluetooth, for that matter, its like popcorn in the microwave for your brain.

Don't tell us the radiation omissions are in the safety zone.

We don't need science to tell us what is safe. Use your common sense.

Ответить
@chaseonthecase9191
@chaseonthecase9191 - 21.07.2023 16:58

I step dad seems to think that his emf necklace can block radiation. He says the technology will change space travel. I hate to tell him that if it worked against radiation being hurled at you buy a giant nuclear ball in space then nasa would already be using it. But I guess he can keep believing

Ответить
@RF-no5rc
@RF-no5rc - 30.06.2023 09:43

🚨 Blocking the emf between your body and the earth is not smart either

Ответить
@johngaultproductions
@johngaultproductions - 29.06.2023 00:08

The phone measurement test seemed a bit weak. Don't the frequencies increase while on a call or while browsing the internet?

Ответить
@slodoco
@slodoco - 18.06.2023 13:56

"All within the safety limit." Yeah, if the phone isn't doing anything. Also what is considered safe and why?

Ответить
@Therionx
@Therionx - 25.05.2023 05:47

So keep lots of aluminum foil around .

Ответить
@alanlim7068
@alanlim7068 - 22.05.2023 19:43

use aluminium foil

Ответить
@Word569
@Word569 - 22.05.2023 03:47

It has been proven that wireless device radiation is NOT really safe by many scientific studies. Although the levels from wireless device do not kill you outright, they decrease glutathione, a very important antioxidant and cause other negative biological effects which some people are especially sensitive to that have electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS). The wireless device radiation has been termed the "New smoking." Smoking a few cigarettes a day won;'t kill you but over time there will be negative effects.

The best way to protect yourself is turning off or lowering the output level of the wireless device, increasing distance from the source and or shielding. The problem with many shielding or EMF eliminating protection products is that they don't work at all or are not really effective. In order for a fabric to be effective, it has to have metal in it as metal can easily block radio frequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs). It is difficult to block low frequency magnetic fields which requires special metal like mu-metal. Increasing the distance from the source is a good way to lower exposure.

Ответить
@Roninator69
@Roninator69 - 18.05.2023 19:03

What about lambs or Aires tech have you guys heard anything about them, are they good or is there no way to prevent emfs

Ответить
@ThatGoth
@ThatGoth - 18.05.2023 14:42

The baby hat works like a tin foil hat, which actually increases the EMF hitting the head by reflecting all EMF from below in to a point inside the beanie (like a satellite dish).

Ответить
@smarterthanyou9090
@smarterthanyou9090 - 07.03.2023 20:03

The activation signal will be three 1-minute bursts of 28GHz. That is the kill frequency which activates the "thing" that people volunteered to have put inside of them.

Ответить
@kimberlybrown9671
@kimberlybrown9671 - 06.02.2023 04:24

dumb video when there are products out there being tested with emf meters that infact do work. Clearly they chose products that do not work.

Ответить
@tomholbrook2948
@tomholbrook2948 - 03.01.2023 08:40

Thank you for this information.
Please stay truthful and honest. We need it

Ответить
@marlonmcbrando4712
@marlonmcbrando4712 - 27.11.2022 00:43

This shows that most products are just, but there is a ton of science behind faraday cages and faraday fabrics...why did these people buy only extremely cheap products that are fake and then never even mention fardaday fabrics, which can actually work? And why not explain which products work and which ones are junk? Also, it is unclear from where they sensors are measuring...so it is hard to say why some things work and some don't...thought those stickers seem really stupid.

Ответить
@isthistwitterbruh
@isthistwitterbruh - 26.11.2022 22:06

Comments section in here is truly depressing, christ people

Ответить
@JudySeegerDetox
@JudySeegerDetox - 25.11.2022 23:36

Wow! I guess she didn't do enough research! She needs to study thermagraphs to see how much emf harms our body 😉

Ответить
@megusta9045
@megusta9045 - 12.11.2022 04:53

The testing didn't actually look very scientific. Would like to see natural fabrics like linen and wool added besides the silver cloth ones

Ответить
@bluestorm9651
@bluestorm9651 - 30.10.2022 06:35

What if you live near a 5g tower? How do I protect myself from that aside from moving???

Ответить
@sharonsmith1505
@sharonsmith1505 - 22.10.2022 21:01

why they nor using them.

Ответить
@psychopig
@psychopig - 12.09.2022 11:54

Can you also do the Scalar Energy Stickers that claims that it can reduce electric energy consumption.

Ответить
@JRLB38
@JRLB38 - 02.09.2022 19:44

They used really cheap products.

Ответить
@zknight2
@zknight2 - 28.08.2022 06:28

Sadly these scientists do not understand how the Tesla harmonizer worked. It was never designed to stop the signal (that would make your phone useless), but condition the signal to be compatible with the body. There are frequencies that are good for the body (ie. infrared) and frequencies such are very bad (ie. 5G - 60GHz).

Ответить
@BrianHallmond
@BrianHallmond - 25.07.2022 06:20

That beanie might be worth it for everyone!

Ответить
@yourcrazyinorganicchemisti9454
@yourcrazyinorganicchemisti9454 - 12.07.2022 06:42

Quite a few of the “anti radiation” products are radioactive themselves ionizing radiation that is. Although everyone is exposed to extremely high amounts of radiation all around them all day everyday for example light, most of this radiation is harmless ( I say most because well in any radiation is given enough power or amplification can harm you) your cellphone and stuff ain’t one of them now the radioactive particles usually thorium dioxide flaking off of those products that’s something you might wanna be more concerned about

Ответить
@liangshuang5436
@liangshuang5436 - 22.02.2022 16:36

whats with the choice of the bgm

Ответить
@Xanitrit_Zeo
@Xanitrit_Zeo - 06.02.2022 05:30

The best anti radiation protection is a hazmat suit. But unless you want to die of heatstroke why bother. Daily background radiation is harmless unless you're living at Fukushima or Chernobyl.

Ответить