Evolution: Fact or Fiction? Part 2 - The Patterns

thanks

Any one of you evo muppets stumbling across the word 'HELLO' formed by stones in a forest would quickly conclude it had been placed there by an intelligent being. Yet within the cells of a human being there is so much INFORMATION that you would need trillions of flash drives to store that exquisitely sequenced ordered INFORMATION, but of course in your Narnia imaginations it created itself, using a system of lossy mutational BS that ignores the 2nd law of thermodynamics and low and behold evolution is the only known thing in the universe that becomes more complex, ordered, and superior over vast amounts of time - PITY genetic degradation is going to lead to the extinction of many living things in a matter of tens of thousands of years, which is real strange considering this wasn't an issue for the fantasy billions of years. God created everything and all living things have insanely complex code written into their cells that would make any top level programmer curl up and cry like a baby. Parts of this code enable adaptation functionality in order for any species to adapt to changes in their environment and the information to do this has to be present in the first place. Evolution would seem more plausible to explain idiots who believe the multi direction readable genetic code that is unfathomably complex in order and structure, than the questionable reason God allowed fools to embrace an absurdity like evolution, oh yeah the creators ultimate gift - FREE WILL!

If you leave an Uncreated cause of the Cosmos out of the picture, then the philosophical conclusions of science become meaningless! There are no true atheists; there are only misguided ones who are actually pantheists!

“First, DNA is not self-reproducing, second, it makes nothing and third, organisms are not determined by it” (Lewontin, 1992). Lewontin, Richard C. (1992). "The Dream of the Human Genome", The New York Review, May 28, 31-40.

Evolution BY MEANS OF BLIND AND MINDLESS processes is total untestable bullshit unless you are discussing genetic diseases and deformities.

Evolution?
No god involved, so it can't be accepted.
However, creationism is acceptable because there is god involved.

Not considered: Religion has no truth which makes it
Male
Bovine
Excrement

Awesome, you have nailed the YECs.
There is no such thing as a Young Earth Evolutionists and there are other independent lines of compelling evidence to support the belief in an old earth, sun, solar system, galaxy and universe, etc, the issue is time.
YECs should be considered Young Earthers. I think they know this, but they prefer to argue with Life Scientists rather than Physicists, Geologists and Astronomers.

When you say the general public I believe you are referring to well in excess of 40% of Americans - staggering! Is it the result of religious insanity or is it because it makes televangelists wealthy?

evolution is logically conclusive and can be observed in real time...I really dont get the denial of facts in our reality. And its coming from people who believe in something they cannot see, touch or experience in any way other then "fuzzy feelings"....

Made it to 1.32 before I heard a lie. Dna mutations do not make new proteins or new traits. Heredity is the mixing of traits already in the parents. Mutations destroy the code of life. Peace

A scientific theory which not only has lasted 164 years without being disproved, but has also accumulated evidence to support it at an increasing exponential rate is fact! It is more than can be said for gravity, which I believe has been debunked as a force, if not as a perception.

Evolution is soft science based on historical inferences, assumptions and philosophy.
You don't build bridges, computers, or design space stations using such inferences.
You use hard repeatable and testable techniques.

Secondly, the instant you claim anything in science as a fact, you have left science for dogma.

Evolution is an ever changing unfalsifiable fairytale in my opinion which was soundly refuted with the Cambrian explosion and the abandonment of Darwins gradualism.

It is now obvious naturalistic evolution and origins is mathematically impossible.

When you really think about it, the error is obvious.
Naturalists must believe a bucket of dirt, sunlight and time wrote the complete works of Shakespeare.

That's religion, not science.

Mechanisms determine patterns.

You need a proof for this tree-like related structure. Description is not a proof. Two explanations come to mind: 1. evolution as you seem to indicate, 2. creation. Per se, I see no objections to either. Perhaps the fossil record (sudden Cambrian phyla appearance), population dynanics (small populations cannot be successful in making mutational changes stick), the working of mutations (one at a time, not millions) the sheer number of differences in nucleotides, etc. could possibly support 2.

This will bring out the Science deniers and moon-howlers. As they vent their frustrations with reality LOL. 😂😂

I'm over 50 and the fact that this is still an issue in the U.S. is depressing to me.

Consider a pseudo-AI. They are a being made to calculate just like an AI does.

Give the pseudo-AI some weaponized aerial drones.

Get the pseudo-AI to twist the species of Earth to your ultimate ends. It will never get bored and it will never tire. Since they are technically a living thing itself you can just make them have their own children in various forms. Let it be the ancestor of all life.

After a bunch of killing unwanted species and general meddling, humans come around. The AI has little to no self-will, but it is very intelligent, if in a very unfocused way. The drones soon disappear, as the humans begin to write things down.

The humans are none the wiser to the pseudo-AI. They never did anything to raise suspicion. Really, the humans have never met an AI, so they would not know to suspect one anyway. And they would only come to this conclusion if they could imagine it first, as it does such a good job of being unknown.

The pseudo-AI, the ancestor of all life could exist, or it could not. But it is really is just a better version of the creationist position. The pseudo-AI has all the intelligence of a creator, is vastly powerful like a God (they really are one), but it is also genuinely uses evolution, and has the consistency of an inanimate object so it can be hidden in the background.

So basically, if you ever see a creationist, ask them why the designer of the world did not use a pseudo-AI.

He is completely wrong about creationists. Creationists use SCIENCE to prove evolutionists wrong. But evolutionists are blind and deaf to any science put to them that questions their religion of evolution.

OMG he has his evolution religion tattooed on his arms.

If deep time is a slam dunk fact then why does actual dinosaur collagen have the same Carbon 14 ratios as mammoths? Dr. Miller tricked AMS labs at several colleges into dating them without telling what they were. Plus dinosaur fossils encased in sandstone are from a more sterile environment than where mammoths are found so the extreme amateur 'refutation' of 'contamination' is just plain scientifically ignorant. Collagen inside these dinosaur fossils are very real and plentiful to find as secular reports have found. What eliminates the issue of contamination with collagen? Professional protocols puts these thru a patented collagen filtration process to purify it to being 100% all collagen. Then a spectrometry test gives the light signature to validate it is 100% pure. THEN the Carbon 14 test is given.

Why hasn't any of the peer review-endorsed scientists given any counter-testing in any refutation on the entire internet? When a spinned evolution-friendly finding showed dinosaur carbon-containing remains of proteins were similar to chickens...a bird...you know how the story goes...it was reported all over the world in all media forums. BUT COMPLETE SILENCE with collagen Carbon 14 dating. Carbon 14 should be completely absent after 100,000 years. A Carbon14-dead result would have even better importance. It would be reported all over the world just like the protein sequences being like a chicken. BUT COMPLETE SILENCE. There is evidence of absence showing we are a young existence.

This only leaves one retort from all of the evolution fans who mentor-worship. It's to act like you did not read a word here and claim mental retardation. Go ahead and fake having no critical thinking skills. Go ahead. Make assertions without demonstration with no cut and paste of counter-links to support you. LOL. Can any of you come up to my standard? Who of you are like me?

It's like calling a Tire the entire automotive industry.
Your talking about idealism in code which is very contradictory to a materlisit explanation of darwin & lyles contextual gradualism of the strong will survive. . the very code and program is in line with entropy with an orgon that is fully coded then decays. Nothing advanced forward .the dominate mutation is negative. Besides who are we to decide what is an advantage of this universe ?it's not fundamental to reality..
Tiny mechanism that doesn't explain engineering. The prohibition of law in USA doesn't allow it to be challenged is why its not liked. No competing school of thought.

I suggest Aron Ra's 50 part series 'Systematic Classification of Life' for more

Good luck getting someone who doesn't understand or "believe" in evolution to pass a Comparative Vertebrate Anatomy course

The similarity is not enough when there is a problem in the process (Random mutations) itself.

they like to ignore evolution but when arguing about noah's flood they suddenly use it as how diversity happened after the flood because the ark could never carry 2 of every species and keep them alive. so then they argue for evolution at supersonic speed.

As a former Young Earth Creationist, I appreciate the way you explain these concepts. I don't know if I would've been receptive to hearing them back when I was drunk on the Kool-Aid, but I hope others who are still as I was will be open to it.

Evolution is absurd. Billions of bits of written programming can’t write itself. No directed working mechanism can ever order itself.

『p』『r』『o』『m』『o』『s』『m』

Evolution is fiction. Actual adaptations are an ingrained biological ability of the epigenome. It works without evolution-needed-to-progress DNA mutations. It's done by chemical tagging, largely by methylation, turning genes on and off or up and down. It's the same system giving us our gene expression modifications. This action is called epigenetics. In 2014, it was finally elucidated to pass adaptations, such as in Darwin Finches, for HUNDREDS of generations...not two or three as postulated prior by evolutionists.

Dr. Skinner used a scientific method to do some sleuthing if it was evolving DNA mutations that correlated with these adaptations or were they epigenetic-derived? It was epigenetics, meaning no evolution processes are involved. The assertions of genome degeneration causing evolutionary generation goes down in flames as laughable mere comic book science. 'Evidence' for evolution has been a mirage.

Then evolutionists will do a sleight of hand by calling DNA mutation-caused trait changes as being the same as the epigenome-derived modifications. However, they are evolution-impertinent. On top of all of this, the evolution-free epigenetic-derived adaptations has been called 'microevolution' for all these decades. These smoke and mirrors were used as a 'step' toward the macroevolution mind-constructs. See the convolution with evolution? It's insidious. I have the evolution playbook all figured out after an intensive 13 years of research.

Adaptation by the epigenome fits the intelligent design signature. The designer? Jesus Christ without doubt.

Evolution is a creation myth not a fact it is an interpretation of things observed that are said to be fact.

Piltdown and Nebraska man are examples of the eagerness to believe in this theory.We are told this and that happened hundreds of millions of years ago. .

A more recent example being soft tissue in dinasaur bones showing that so called facts we have been told for decades are not facts but fallacies you dont have to be a PHD to know meat dont last a hundred million years. Yet people say but it can we know these bones are a hundred million years old.