Has the multiverse theory now been debunked? #stem #science

The double slit experiment has to be the biggest idi-t filter of the modern age, it's such a simple experiment with such an obvious result yet supposedly intelligent and educated people will confidently talk bs because they're confused by a word 🤣

This is grossly simplified, and leaves out major details. The internet is a breeding ground for misinformation. PLEASE if you are interested, go look up WHY some particles behave differently, and do your own research on topics like this

What people don't get is everytime they measure, the measuring device they use is giving of electromagnetic waves that corrupts the photon Waves

We could solve every question of our universe and still not know if multiverse is real if it’s akin to Galilean Relativity. Nothing we can do inside our box can tell us what’s outside the box

Now we just need the afterlife theory

Whether or not you look at the photons, it doesn't make a difference in the slit experiment. It's not your consciousness magically, making the photon act like a wave or a particle is the fact that you are making a measurement on that photon, which causes it's behavior as a wave and/or a particle

Maybe it's an anomaly in their city. I wonder why...

Who's to say this idea is even a make or break of the multiverse theory in the first place? Even if this thing is right or wrong, it could just have no relation in the first place.

Misinformation merchant, never make videos about physics again

How tf we know something’s doing something if it stops doing it when we observe it

The observer effect is so misleading, the particals are not changing because were "looking at them", their particals, theu dont care. To observe them we have to blast them with other particals and messuer the collisions, which knocks them out of where they would be thats why it behaves weirdly,

Only one universe

So does it just reinforce the quantum uncertainty idea?

were in a simulation. its been proven multipule times. you die its like a sim in sims dying nothing happens and the people above our simulation are also in a simulation!

and way more fun of a theory to believe in. It’ll make me sad if it’s disproven

You did a poor job of explaining the double slit experiment. I didn’t finish your video

My reasoning for the multiverse that I came up with in 5 th grade

There are many galaxies

They exist within the confines of the universe

Now the universe has a certain size
Which means it has an end

So

Where is the universe

Well it’s in a larger over arching place called the multiverse

And like how there’s multiple galaxies in the universe

There’s probably multiple universes in the multiverse

Unless beyond the universe is just pure unadulterated void of nothingness

That wouldn't disprove the multiversity theory, only that the double slit experiment is no longer evidence of it

How did we observe the ones we didn't observe? Seriously someone please answer

this doesnt disprove the multiverse theory it simply explains
where the light particle goes

This cannot debunk the multiverse theory at all but go off i guess

Yes it is true. And they are called versals

It never left the area... but we didn't see them in that area.

Anti debunked if you had a black hole and a while you get a wormhole which leads to another universe and plus at the same time quantum exists and quantum theories exist which again your theory is debunked. But isn't it is not leaving the universe because to University are connected by a warm mobile a wormhole is not a universe so yeah parallel universes

Hiroshima is very well related to physics and the like

So we do live In the worst time line great

So you're saying there isn't a universe where I'm not a loser?

Wildly misleading explanation

The multiverse idea relating to the double slit experiment, if I‘m not mistaken, is not that the photon is „disappearing into another universe“, it’s supposed to be that there is a universe where a photon picks one slit and another universe where the photon picks the other slit. The moment when it „chooses“ is what leads to the multiversal idea.

Yeah she's the one

Is this woman sane? It’s very hard to watch.

Your energy is perfect 😅

For this experiment when they say observe, what the really mean is shining light(photons) on fired electrons. It should be pretty obvious this isn't a passive action. Imagine if the only way for someone to see if your eye was open was to poke it with a pencil. Hmmm it's always closed.... therefore eyes don't open.

Saying "when we observe the photon, it does..." is a bit misleading. It also encourages magical thinking. It's much better and more responsible to inform people:
"When we use detectors to measure/ detect photons, we find..."
This way, even scientifically illiterate people will be able to recognise that the different results aren't due to photons shyness at being observed, but rather they're due to interactions with functioning detectors.

Well, there might be a universe in the multiverse that has debunked multiverse theory! 😮🤔

It's not because we look at it, it's because of the instruments we use to look at it. The interference pattern changes because the instruments we use to track the photon interfere with it. It's not literally because we look at it. I forgot who explained this. Might have been Dr. Tyson, though.

It was never a theory to begin with

There is such a thing as a multi-verse, but it's based on our decision from day to day

I don't understand any of it but what about that debunks there being multiverses? Like sure we now know where the photon went but if multiverse shit exists why would the photon not going there prove it isnt real?

There does seem to be a lot of misconception over this experiment, especially when it comes to trying to simplify it, which is where I believe the intedimentional particle idea came from. The original experiment never suggested anything about dimensional vorteces or conscious particals and from I recall of it, the finding were inconclusive and required more experimentation to determine what is actually happening. And so, about 50 misconceived articles and a number of unfounded experiments later and we have teleporting, intedimentional, quantum locked, or shape shifting particles that are defying to laws of physics...I'm sure somewhere out there are some good new experiments to get a better understanding of this, but it's damn there impossible to wade through all the bullshit pseudoscience...

An absolutely critical correction to your statement is that it is nothing to do with whether or not we are observing them, but rather whether or not they are interacting with their environment as they pass through the slits. Looking at the slits or not looking at the slits with our eyes has absolutely no effect on the experiment, it is only when you take a measurement of the photon, and a measurement can be any sort of physical interaction with the environment, that it is forced out of its quantum state and into a discreet location. No, the moon does not stop existing when everyone looks away from it, because the Moon is interacting with itself and its environment all the time.

They didn't debunk the multiverse, they just showed that the double-slit experiment isn't evidence of it.

I don't see the funny on this 🥱

But its goes through theye 5th dimension that why where it's spits there the same and leave through the same spit so leaves and enter and leave through the same splits that why so its does I'm pretty sure?

I do believe in the multiverse but I think that the theory that that photon is leaving this universe is stupid. It can't leave our own universe it's stuck in one universe. It can't go to another one

I would love there to be a multiverse. But I ain’t so sure. 🤷🏽‍♂️

So misleading

I love ppl with no bases in STEM like to have an opinion on something that they have no idea wtf they are talking about. She clearly understands the topic enough to discuss it and a lot if her work is grossly SUMMARIZED because REAL SCIENTIFIC PAPERS are difficult to for ppl to understand even for ppl in those fields. And at least she corrects herself when incorrect because she isnt spreading false information she's trying to get ppl into STEM. so if you better understand the topic, how about start a discussion instead of giving NON CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM or making passive aggressive remarks because if you were so knowledgeable you should be able to do it to and if thats also the case you should be smart to know that this isnt for ppl like u

Pls don't abstract so many terms... use more scientific terms, I do know some physics and I understood nothing.

We don't know ish