Wikipedia - Behind the Encyclopedia

Suspicious about selected Health articles & FDA influence on Wikipedia - Have donated in the past, but have embarked on an email discussion with their donations department. Eg. Article on Burzynski Clinic - I believe this is terribly biased, & you can find reference to this bias from promoters of the BC. I guess if contributors are volunteers, anyone can get involved in delivery of a narrative in their favor .. Time permitting, I'd like to embark on a challenge to this article content, but expect to encounter some form of censorship .. God Bless Free Speech (even propoganda avenues for FDA stakeholders) 🕊🎺🕊

Calling Wikipedia an encyclopaedia is like calling TMZ a news show !

Wikipedia has ZERO credibilty, they LIE just as much MSM.

What a load of bullshit because we can no longer ask questions and get answers. I used to subscribe to Wikipedia but no more.

But why the head of this is having high blood pressure show nemmyto docter and check his health kindly do. He is so emotional.. I nabendu

Wikipedia needs to accept me that News Of The World came out on theaters and on DirecTV on December 25, 2020 and that The Father came out on theaters and on DirecTV on February 26, 2021.

Wiki is very influenced by American politics.

Wikipedia: 🥹 You: 😕💸

nm

Wikipedia is just one of the most important projects made by humans in history!
It's that's simple!

I love wikipedia. I love that I can search for practically anything followed by "wiki" in me favorite browser and open the wikipedia response to find a plain language explanation of what it is. I agree that wiki is not the best page to base you school paper research on, but wiki is the very best place to start your research for a quick intro to the topic. Thanks to the wiki staff for diligently defending these wiki pages from malicious hackers. I hope wiki stays online and reliable as long as the URL dot is a thing.

EU created of UFO - STOLED TV REAL TIME'S, SERIE of 1989.
EU created international mafian's of TOTO mafie with a IT from Italy and USA and from Ukraine and from Czechoslovakia and from Holand and from Germany and from Austria and ANOTHER'S countries where mafian's sold children's and was high criminal to cleaning criminal activited of corrupt system's where they are sold too much people and STOLED money on death identity.. the minus on this mafian's - they are doing this till today everywhere.

Without mine's agreed! Under Al Kaida! Do you can imagine that they are payed 2mio American dollar's for Afghanistan? BEFORE help UFO!!? Or helping more Ukraine with a money than UFO!?

Google was not created in 1998!!!! Wikipedia have a wrong information! Also about AI technology.
AI technology= brain chip inside of humen connected with a real time of EU to USA.
They have real TIME'S of NASA how they're steeling all of me.

Ah yes, cars, sports, and adult content. Three things you have to be a man to like or be involved in. Because women can't drive, play sports, or be porn stars.

Wikipedia still stands as a great source for a broad overview in what you're studying academically. But, it's also a fantastic resource for the references! Even all my profs are recommending it for that use 😂 academia is not as stodgy as some may think!

Wikipedia started their assault on conspiracy theories we all know is not a theory since it's on our money that says coming of the new world order of the ages Wikipedia is run by the the ones who are trying to cover it up they are the conspiracy theorist providers that is true and then they try to cover up by saying that it's a conspiracy theory bat is coming from another set of nut job people. they are liars. too late. time's up! Since we have been sounding the alarm for the last 3 years and you haven't said one word about it until now. you're not going to get out of this because all the evidence is all over the place

Wikipedia is information presented from a biased and far-left perspective. They decide what is science or pseudoscience. They present information and then decide for you if something is valid or correct or acceptable. Just like Disney and the FBI, I doubt Wikipedia is going to survive the upcoming woke-purge. But then the opportunity will present itself for something better; in all three cases.

Cables

Cable

Great Reaction... Per Usual...

I use Wikipedia a LOT!

is anyone else's captions auto dutch?

Wiki is OK for nonpolitical info that you can find elsewhere, other than that, I despise Wikipedia, It's run by liberal lunatics and most everything they touch turns to sht, they're good at subtle disinformation, across the board these nutjobs continue to be all about control and manipulation of the masses, be very skeptical of anything you read on there that's political, their extreme left bias is obvious, evil azz fkrs, let's start at the top-----FJB

😅🎉

I’m more interested in knowing why they decided to keep the this nonprofit. This website is a gold mine. Could probably get them $billion+ revenue If they commercialized it.

A while back I kept editing the Wikipedia page on federal income tax. No matter how many times I edited it, I was excluded and threatened. I eventually gave up and the misinformation remained. it is still there today. This is the misinformation:

"Basic concepts
A tax is imposed on net taxable income in the United States by the federal, most state, and some local governments."

This is a ruse. The Subject of the tax is not income so the basic concept is hidden. In two Supreme Court cases agreed upon by all justices at the time the Federal Income Tax is an excise tax.

"Moreover in addition the conclusion reached in the Pollock Case did not in any degree involve holding that income taxes generically and necessarily came within the class of direct taxes on property, but on the contrary recognized the fact that taxation on income was in its nature an excise entitled to be enforced as such....
Brushaber v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., 240 U.S. 1, at 16-17 (1916). (Emphasis added.)"

The problem is that no schooling in the United States will teach you exactly what an excise tax is. This is how Wikipedia misinforms the reader by adding complications to hide the truth:

Wrong definition
"An excise is considered an indirect tax, meaning that the producer or seller who pays the levy to the government is expected to try to recover their loss by raising the price paid by the eventual buyer of the goods."

The reason that you cannot see how illogical that statement is is that you were never taught what an indirect tax is. No one I have met or know personally has a working knowledge of what an indirect tax is. Here is the argument:

If the Supreme Court labeled the Federal Income Tax an excise tax, they also labeled it an indirect tax because excise taxes are in the class of indirect taxes. Therefore, that definition of excise tax does not make sense. It is outright misinformation because there is no middleman in the collection of the Federal Income tax (producer, seller). There is a direct payment from you to the government. This is without question. So the IRS tries to remedy this lack of logic by calling the Federal Income Tax a DIRECT TAX! But the Supreme Court already define the Federal Income Tax as an indirect tax!

Wrong definition by the IRS:
"A direct tax is one that the taxpayer pays directly to the government. These taxes cannot be shifted to others."

That is not what a direct tax is. Simply put a direct tax is a tax on property and the constitutional rule is that it must be apportioned. I don't know at the moment, of any direct taxes levied by the Federal Government.

So what is an indirect tax? It is a tax on an activity or event. A sales tax is an indirect tax. They are not taxing the television (property), they are taxing the activity of purchase. When you pay a toll to enter a highway, they are not taxing your car or the highway, they are taxing the use of the highway, the event. It takes a while to fully comprehend what an indirect tax is, and have a working knowledge of its definition.

A tax laid upon the happening of an event, as distinguished from its tangible fruits, is an indirect tax.
Tyler v. United States, 281 U.S. 497, at 502 (1930)

And why is it that the IRS does not want you to know that the income tax is an indirect tax? Because of wrongful indictments due to the exclusion of nature and cause as per the 6th Amendment.

Wikipedia isn't just controlled by communist it is also controlled by Free Masonic deceivers. They still stand by the government's false narrative about the 9/11 attacks even though over 4000 architects and engineers have signed a petition asking for a new unbiased 9/11 investigation.

common austria prince was accepted

common where's my subscription i think its worth 3.00 a month cant beat national enquirer but its close

I donate to it. It is a fine source ppl just hate they cite academic facts. Socialist hate it but it is fine.

Wikipedia is a fine source. Everybody hatin on wikipedia

I’ve donated annually and use the site for some knowledge but the accuracy is not good for academic purposes. For general knowledge from the internet it’s a great source.

11:35pm 10/27/2022

About Wikipedia
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that anyone can edit, and tens of millions already have!

You shouldn't donate to Wikipedia because they disallowed and deleted my biography page for a-rod ricky roy amongst other pages for black people... Wikipedia does this purposely to limit the historical content and historical relevance people of color have... Wikipedia therefore discriminates and is prejudice... They have plenty of pages for serial killers and klan members though...

Yes

So interesting! Thank you <3

Wikipedia may be free, but it's ruled by uneducated, puerile bullies hiding behind their devices. DON'T COPY or even TRUST Wikipedia. 90% of it is tripe. Then you get blocked for correcting BLATENT rubbish.

WO WO WOOOOOOOOOOOOO Wikipedia is fake ok. The Encyclopedia was facts so let's not get it twisted.

Teachers: The wikipedia is not a reliable source
Also teachers: George Washington has cut down a cherry tree

Wikipedia is pure sh*t. Using a single location to gather info is idiotic, even if it weren’t controlled by Marxist children

Wikipedia is a great source of Disinformation!

Whay is the most reliable "ubiased" encyclopedia online? I think that any source of information that can't be edited by everyone has "credibilty". No profits=Communism! Does Wiki lean to the left? Perhaps. Do they lean to to the " far " left? I don't think they lean as far to the left as Conservapedia "leans" towards the right. I do use Wikipedia as a source of info. I do donate about twenty five dollars a year. It is generally political and religious Conservatives who are most critical of Wikipedia because they "lean towards the left". And not the right. They don't wave the flag or the Bible. They don't..... metaphorically felletate Uncle Sam or Jesus! 🤔😉

I donate something small to Wikipedia/WikiMedia Foundation every once in a while. Because I really do use the thing quite a bit. If I’m just looking up an obscure tv show or comic book character or something it gives me a nice, fast reading digest version on the subject. If I’m looking up anything more serious, like for something professional or a court appearance or anything impactful like that? It also gives me a nice tight digest version on the subject and then a bibliography of 50 sources I can actually CITE in front of a manager or a judge 😂😂😂

I can not stress that enough. The bibliography is the best feature of Wikipedia. Do NOT go in front of a professor, a regional manager, or a judge and say “this is what it says on Wikipedia”. DO go in front of them and say “according to a Forbes Magazine article in March of 2013” or “may I read to the court from a New England Journal of Law article dated October 1997?” Things like that. Remember, Wikipedia is not your SOURCE. Wikipedia is a really really good search engine upon which you can FIND your source, plus a 200 word essay on and around the topic.

A liberal communist source of misinformation.... completely utter biased... a joke