Комментарии:
Russian Brrrt!
ОтветитьToo slow compared to US..
Ответить1st scene is Chinese made (copy)
Indonesian navy 40 meter fast missile boat
These are antiquated systems. They aren't going to have enough time to take out a modern high speed missile, which isn't a huge red balloon floating just a few km's away. Sea skimming anti-ship missiles can remain totally hidden until they are a mere 15km away, and they suddenly go into a terminal phase at this point where they rapidly accelerate to close the time window. Meaning they go from their cruise speed to a speed rapidly of around 1200km/s. Meaning the defending ship would only have a mere 12.5 seconds until impact, these old Russian CIWS systems can't perform a detection and interception within that time frame.
Now the US Phalanx is better obviously, a more modernised CIWS. However if someone put a guy to my head asked if I was confident that a US ship purely using its Phalanx as a defence against a Taiwanese Hsiung Feng III strike, I honestly wouldn't be confident that even the Phalanx would reliably defend the ship from that.
It's good to see that the Russians have incorporated Dalek technology and firepower in their warship.
ОтветитьWe have a 1.62 million rpm gun we aint scared of this puny 10,000
ОтветитьНу чего? Запад? Как вы педики поживаете? 😁👍
ОтветитьAk 630 M2
Ответить...but does it have any actual combat use?
ОтветитьNote, it only works 1 out of every 10 uses
ОтветитьI thought that AA is weak i think the Slow firing is Show by Western
ОтветитьAmerican submarine. "We followed you out of port and we're just waiting for you to f******. "
American satellite dropping heavy metal. "Cool gun! Sorry you can't stop gravity "
huh i worder where they got this idea? (A-10),(sea whiz)? no surely not they wouldnt steal our old ideas! 5.45x39 maybe alittle like the 5.56.
Ответитьточность оставляет желать лучшего
ОтветитьЛол
ОтветитьThey tried to put these guns in MiG-27s and Su-25s...with disastrous consequences. It's the fastest firing 30mm gun in service.
ОтветитьIs that stromboli volcano in the background ?
ОтветитьこれをMIGに搭載してたって頭おかしいわ
ОтветитьI just found out It's kcr from Indonesia 😂its not ak630 but its norinco ng18 from chinese
ОтветитьIs this ballon attack in slow motion?
Ответитьwell this thing must be useless
Ответить* looks at AK306 * Thats a lot of damage! How 'bout little more. * loads up AK630 * HAHAHAHA
Ответитьnah man forget m61 now they have gau 8 ripoffs!
ОтветитьIn the era of drones there could be a swam which could overwhelm systems like this designed to defend against missiles
ОтветитьThey take up allot of space and they are slow moving. I can see why now those drones easily took out Russia's flag ship.
ОтветитьHere’s a joke:
AK-630 can bring down missiles due to its intense fire rate and area effect.
Funny? Nah I don’t think so. But that’s sarcasm.
Plus wtf they use a balloon? What did they expect enemy to shoot them with? China Spy Balloon?😂😂😂
I can understand why AK-630 exists, no accuracy pure wall of lead. Spray and pray but on FUCKING STEROIDS. Why does AK306 exists is pure mistery to me. No rate of fire, no accuracy and no range... What's the point?
Ответитькакая нахрин война против России вы о чём говорите?!
Ответить😂😂😂
Ответить這個射擊精度
看就知道根本死定了
🇿 🇻 🇴
ОтветитьI just watched a short video of the Russian Priazovye ship using one of those to destroy a Ukrainian drone boat at a few hundred metres distance. It fired just a couple of killing shots at a time. Impressive.
Ответитьair force belike 😨😰
ОтветитьMissing a Balloon? That's what ya need for missile defense
Ответитьthats one hell of an inaccurate weapon
ОтветитьDem bullets are everywhere 😐
Ответитьa world war will with type of tech will end the world
ОтветитьKalashnikov also designed this?!
ОтветитьDidnt helped the moscwa
ОтветитьIts in the place of the main gun?
Ответитьsucks
ОтветитьMORE DAKKA!
Ответитьand soviet engineers put "almost" the same gun as this one on a fighter 💀
ОтветитьThe fact that they put this on a plane too
ОтветитьImpressive!
ОтветитьThis is why Germany stopped using zeppelins on russia
Ответить