#Shorts Sticky Mail

54 года назад

24,927 Просмотров

Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCO1uvVSUEv7H3m46ZleP-DA/join

Shout out to my PATA supporters!!:

Richard A.
Mr. J. Daggett
Chicago Johnny
Micheal G.
Mel B.
Robert L.
Dorthy K.
Stephanie G.
Daniel E.

Here at Prove All Things Audits (PATA), where we PROVE if our natural rights are respected in the real world. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by sharing this video, liking and subscribing.

#1stAmendmentaudit
#FirstAmendmentaudit
#1Aaudit
#1stAmendmentaudit2022
#copwatch
@Prove All Things Audits

Please comment, like, share and subscribe..it REALLY helps get the content out to more people..and helps people understand their rights!!!

email me newsworthy videos or messages, or just say Hi: [email protected]

Send Me Stuff:

Prove All Things Audits
3589-3 N. Shiloh Dr. #48
Fayetteville, AR [72703]

Help keep PATA on the road:

Go Fund Me Short Link: https://gofund.me/30c71353

Cash App: $ProveAllThingsAudits

Donate via PayPal https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=TM25ZUQWS4FMA

PATA Venmo https://account.venmo.com/u/proveallthingsaudits

PATA Facebook https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100087666553724

PATA Instagram https://www.instagram.com/proveallthingsaudits/

PATA TikTok https://www.tiktok.com/@proveallthingsaudits?is_from_webapp=1&sender_device=pc

PATA Patreon https://www.patreon.com/ProveAllThingsAudits

PATA Twitter: https://twitter.com/ProveATaudits Twitter Handle: @ProveATaudits

YouTube Handle: https://youtube.com/@proveallthingsaudits @proveallthingsaudits

This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities , but is is no way to be taken as legal advice. The opinions expressed by myself in a video are my own.

FAIR USE NOTICE This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.

Disclaimer: Please understand that NONE of our videos should be considered a "call to action." We are not lawyers. NONE of our videos should be construed as legal advice. You should seek legal counsel if you believe that you are a victim of police misconduct. The facts presented in our videos are not indicative of our personal opinions. Laws, case law, ordinances, policies, legal doctrine, and all other jurisprudence is subject to the interpretation of the court. The videos we show are designed to be educational, and informative based on the information available at the time the video was published. All claims made are alleged.

Behavior
Auditors typically travel to a place that is considered public property, such as a sidewalk or public right-of-way, or a place open to the public, such as a post office or government building, and visibly and openly photograph and record buildings and persons in their view.

In the case of sidewalk or easement audits, the conflict arises when a property owner or manager states, in substance, that photography of their property is not allowed. Sometimes, auditors will tell property owners upon questioning that they are photographing or recording for a story, they are photographing or recording for their "personal use", or sometimes auditors do not answer questions. Frequently, local law enforcement is called and the auditor is sometimes reported as a suspicious person and are often also identified as having been on private property. Some officers will approach the auditors and request his or her identification and an explanation of their conduct. Auditors refusing to identify sometimes results in officers arresting auditors for obstruction of justice, disorderly conduct, or other potential or perceived crimes.

Some auditors occasionally yell insults, derogatory language, and vulgarities at police officers who attempt to stop them from recording or improperly demand identification. Police will wrongly sometimes charge auditors with disorderly conduct when they engage in behavior that could be considered unlawful. That's when we "fix dey ass up."

The rights exercised in a typical audit are freedom of speech and freedom of the press in the First Amendment

Thoughts and Opinions expresses in this video are mine, and are not to used at legal advice in any way. Alway do your due diligence and consult proper council for your situation.

Тэги: