Комментарии:
2030!
ОтветитьGood ol' American geography moxie: the Tanger in Tanger Med port does not rhyme with 'anger'. Soft 'g' like in 'manager'. Probably because the well-known city of Tangier is close by.
ОтветитьThe money men will love the potential economic advantage, but imagine the amount of elegale immigration from Africa into Europe, how will the population of Europe react to this? and have Europeans been consulted?
ОтветитьThe security comments here are invalid. Because Spain already has land in Africa and protects it. Therefore, if an agreement is reached with Morocco, this bridge will be protected on both sides because it will provide a great economic breakthrough. Instead of thinking that illegal immigrants will cross the bridge, this problem will be solved by customs checkpoints to be established on both sides of the bridge.
ОтветитьRacism
ОтветитьI see China On the Way to the Rescue !
ОтветитьWhen UK and the rest of the northern europe goes to war with russia, spain can simply snatch it.
Never interrupt your opponent when he's going towards a spike hein
That whole continent was Africa. Even that european place it was all africa till they divided it and it still loses far as i'm concerned
Ответитьyeah buddy the spanish government is gonna watch this video and decide to cede some cities for no reason cause some youtouber said they should
Ответить33 minutes of yap yap explaining nothing 😢
ОтветитьWe know why it’s because they don’t want African black countries to be as rich or as developed as them.
ОтветитьThank God there is no bridge. There is enough human pollution in Europe courtesy of Africa. The evidence is in several countries. The U.S. has no bridge yet we own a huge percent of former African's decedents over populating our jails and prisons and prisons on the outside called slums and ghettos. I cannot think of a successful prosperous society in Africa other than Dutch populated South Africa.
Ответитьmake a tunnel
ОтветитьThese videos have a really hard time getting straight to the point
ОтветитьThe only people who don't profit from Africa is...AFRICANS aside from the local warlord receiving bribes to let his people get exploited.
Ответитьhuman world and monkeys world
ОтветитьHow a bout a tunnel?
ОтветитьGibraltar is British Overseas Territory, not part of Spain.
ОтветитьYou know why.
ОтветитьConnect the continents already. Alaska to Russia and this and it would be done
ОтветитьOil rapaciousness.... Here's another excellent reason to drastically decrease the use of fossil fuels. Now.
Ответитьa bridge between Erupe and Afric would create the same illegal migrant situation in Europe.
ОтветитьDo they really need a bridge? I mean all those military age men err, I mean poor old women and children seem to be able to come over by boat with no trouble at all.
Ответитьbecause Europe is already being flooded by pirates... make a bridge why don't ya... how about you just give away my breakfast to the bunch why don't ya...
ОтветитьWhat about a tunnel system like the one under the English Channel?
ОтветитьAny progress on the tunnel since the meeting a year ago?
ОтветитьAre you serious?
Ответитьmake a tunnel
ОтветитьThere are enough Africans in Europe as it stands.
ОтветитьI like the idea of that floating island towards the end of the video!
ОтветитьBad Idea ! Plain and Simple ! You would see a invasion , like the Americans are seeing , at there southern border !
ОтветитьImmigration of course.
ОтветитьTunnels are far more efficient and will not disrupt the shipping…
ОтветитьJust wondering why you can't build a tunnel like the English Channel under the floor of the Strait of Gibraltar like the English Channel?
ОтветитьI am not a citizen of Spain, nor Morocco. Spain has held those ports for centuries. How long has Morocco been a "country"?
Modern nation/states are such a new concept. Maybe not to 20 yo dummies, but this is why people with education in history become so frustrated with terms like, "neo-colonialism", or even "racism". How far back do you want to go? Each side settles on the time frame that benefits them most. If fighting, killing, and dying are no longer legit reasons to control land/resources.... I wish you would explain that to the Jews, the Palestinians, the Russians, the Ukrainians, the Congolese, the Chinese, the Indians, and George H.W. Bush. Ha,ha!
The modern kids think we will have a big tea party and just all make reasonable arguments, and sign papers????
The Neanderthals were driven to extinction by Homo Sapiens and I haven't seen a difference in one million years. We are born killers.
ahhhhh. ship traffic. what a headache you created. AND, one ship has a direct strike on a footing? 20 billion down the ol' poop chute.
ОтветитьNever mind the engineering- it starts with the concept that a truck is cheaper than a boat for cargo.Non starter. Boats/ships/ferries can move multiple tons of bulk goods at a lower rate. So, you are going to build it for cars and tourists? What is the goal? How much revenue will that generate?
ОтветитьWhat you totally forget to mention is that building a bridge across any major strait is not so much about the length of the bridge but way more about the depth of the strait the bridge has to cross.
In the case of bridging the Gibraltar Strait the pillars that have to support this bridge have to be at least 400 meter tall just to get to the surface level. That is roughly one World Trade Tower building per pillar. And I'm not even talking about the height of the structure above sea level.
It can be build, yes, but it will initially cost hundreds of billions of dollars to complete while the final budget will exceed a trillion because of all the new technology that has to be developed.
Is not gonna happen.
What profit would be brought through commerce of Africa??? Nothing but illegal immigrants...
ОтветитьIt would be worth it just for the hash !
ОтветитьImmigration
ОтветитьThis is so stupid, as if the European leaders want their populations to mix even more with Africa!! 😂
ОтветитьForget under.
Use an arch system. From Spain and Morocco.
As a type of suspension bridge.
With a catalever support.
Would not interfere with shipping..
All work done way above the water.
No pylons needed.. arches take care of plyons.
I’ll make the assumption the Europeans will never want that bridge😅👎👎
ОтветитьRacists
ОтветитьBecause that would be the end of Europe 😂
ОтветитьIf there was/were a bridge erected between Europe and Africa. There would need to be a HEAVY military presence due to the number of Africans that will seek residency/asylum. Look what is happening in Italy and Greece today, just with boats.
ОтветитьNi puentes ni ingleses. ✌🇪🇸
ОтветитьNo need
Ответить