MJ ALLEGATIONS - An Examination

Thank you for taking the time to invite the people from MJInnocent.
The more you study the life of Michael Jackson, the more you realize how he was living in conditions that did not allow him to live a childhood. Whether at Gary Indiana which was plagued in Crime and violent gang fights to Hollywood's opportunistic climate, he never lived a peaceful childhood free from parasites and dangerous individuals. If he was good at detecting the parasites in showbiz so that he would not befriend them, he was unfortunately not very good at detecting the ordinary people and families who only befriended him for his cash and work opportunities. His family has always been welcoming toward everyone. That is why so many fans got to visit Neverland and enjoy easy dialogues with the Jackson family. That family is among the most accessible toward the public. So Michael's welcoming nature was something that he did as well as he learned from his mother to always be welcoming toward fans. But as a bigger celebrity than the rest of his family, he became at the mercy of more parasitic individuals than other celebs. Such as the Chandlers, the Arvizos, the Robsons, and the Safechucks.

What is infuriating is how the latter two families were constantly praising him and defending him when he was alive and when he was dead for many years. But the minute they got money issues or career problems (ex: Robson's Cirque du Soleil failed opportunity), then they decided to claim the opposite of what they stood by under oath for many decades.

As someone who consulted the testimonials of hundreds and hundreds of people who either befriended or interacted closely around MJ, I noticed how they were all supportive and very defensive of him as one of the best human being that they ever met. Whereas those who interacted around his accusers, including people who never met Michael, all had very strong and negative words about these accusers' history and about their behaviors either in public, in private, or at work.

Furthermore, I find it baffling and hypocritical that some medias make a big fuss about MJ being friends with families and with kids, but when other adult celebrities also develop a friendship with kids or with child actors/actresses, they don't experience such media attacks.
Personally, the reason MSM have decided to demonize MJ since the 1980s has something to do with his vitiligo and lupus, and most of all his success with Thriller and his purchase of that music catalogue containing the Beatles songs. Had he not experienced these situations, then he would not have gone through such witch hunts since the 1980s.

Anyone who wants to know more information about Michael can consult the podcasts called "Michael Jackson Case for Innocence", "Red Jackson Dance", "The Mjcast", and the documentaries "Square One MJ", "The Lies of Leaving Neverland”, “Michael Jackson Private Home Movies”, “Michael Jackson Take Two The Footage You Were Never Meant to See”, “Michael Jackson The Humanitarian” and “Loving Neverland”. These sources of information are precious and rich in information that the media refuses to adequately represent.

There were only three accusers, not five. Jason Francia did not accuse MJ of abuse. Two of the accusers were adults who knew each other well and were fully aware of a previous extortion attempt; they also shared the same attorney, Vince Finaldi. So, not entirely unrelated. As for Terry George, he was paid by the media, changed his stories several times, praised and did interviews when Michael Jackson died, admitted he was paid by the media, and then ran away when he could have testified under oath. Like the Amber Heard / Johnny Depp case, these wild claims crumble under cross examination in court, where evidence and testimony matter.

Thanks for taking the time to have these two on the podcast. They really lay out the facts that call these allegations that Michael has faced into question.

Yes, there's the phrase "where there's smoke, there's fire," but if you take the time to look at the facts, transcript and evidence presented, the conclusion is much easier to come to.

Interesting discussion. What I find most fascinating from hearing this is the "supposed bombshell" evidence of Jordan Chandlers drawing allegedly matching Jacksons genitalia. The prosecution spent up to 20$ million chasing Jackson from 1993 to 2005 and flew around the world to chase more victims, yet they did not include the drawing and pictures of Jackson genitalia to either 2 grand jurys in 1993, nor the 2005 trial court case. The prosecution found the drawing of so little use they would not even enter it into evidence, and yet we are treating it as a smoking gun that is undeniable proof Jackson was guilty. I find that utterly baffling. The fact that Jacksons autopsy confirmed Jackson was not circumcised when Jordan claimed he was just hammers down the point the drawing did not match and even would have hurt the credibility of the accuser, hence why they were never introduced as evidence in 1993 or 2005. The tale of this drawing only persists as a way for the losing side/prosecution to get back at the winning side by throwing unsubstantiated nonsense into the air to create doubt!

Congratulations, Sir, on facilitating this discussion; at no point did you stutter, shake, or appear doubtful. I am wondering as to what you do for a living? Now, because you supplied proof and facts to back your claim that MJ was guilty, and each time the guests destroyed this evidence, I am certain now beyond measure that MJ was an innocent man who was taken advantage of. It supports the fact that if you are too kind you will be taken advantage off.

Host: I guess we can also agree Wade and James had no financial motives to take part in the film.


Sam and Anika: Oh yes there’s huge financial motives and these are the possible financial motives…

Host: Yes so as we’ve agreed there’s no financial motives.


Please I understand you playing the “devil’s advocate” but please at least do it in good faith.