24fps vs 23.976fps | FRAME RATE dilemma for filmmakers

this was really well done!

I got a big problem. I just bought a Sony fs7 but i need to shoot a feature in 24p. For a movie/cinematic look i need 24p. But in the camera settings i only see 23.98p and 25p. What should i do?

Great video essay

I hate this accent so so so much 😮

look, basically this is all bullshit. You have to study Philo Farnsworth . Phosphor back in those days had a lot to do with things. but that's all bullshit as well. all equipment these days can shoot straight 24fps but the idiot liberals in hollywood still believe that this 23.976 shit must still go on. don't be one those, remember , the best education is an education!

I would say just shoot true 24fps in all situations. (Aside from higher frame rates like 30fps and 60fps, etc.)

Hey! Thanks for this video.
Can you please help?
I shot & edited short film on 23.976 fps,
Film fests. are demanding 24 fps.
Should i render it to 24 fps and if i do, will there be any changes ?

One more thing that i noticed is after adding video of 23.976 fps (Shot, edited and rendered with same fps) have lag or lack of fluency.
What should i do in both the scenarios?

24 frames per 1.001 seconds makes so much sense now, thank you.

but the camera companies STILL don't give us pro-sumer cameras that can shoot True 30.0 or True 60.0 fps.

Probably the best explanation I’ve ever heard respectively seen. Good job 👏 ❤

Complete explanations and moving commentary at the end, I loved it.

Gracias. La velocidad le da la magia. Saludos, desde Argentina.

👏👏 thank you . A new thing I've learned. Greatly appreciated. 👍👋

One of the best videos on topic I've come across. Well done and thank you!!

Hello great Video, when I shoot in 60fps or 120fps, should I export in 24fps or 23,98 fps?

any defference in motion(natuaral moton blure ) between 24fps and 23.97 fps?

Fantastic lesson and the presentation is top shelf!

Can you really tell the difference when you watch it?

A great deal of effort has been put on it by engineering minds, and since it has been arduously carried on by filmmakers, to linger your experience to a great extent of time, to help you contemplate. Which makes you a more sensible living being and you resonate more with lift itself.

“The allotted function of art is not, as is often assumed, to put across ideas, to propagate thoughts, to serve as an example. The aim of art is to prepare a person for death, to plough and harrow his soul, rendering it capable of turning to good.”

― Andrei Tarkovsky

Great Topic there.

The best explanation I came across Internet. I know os this things before because my father was a TV engineer and spoke about this things.

Thank you. This video is made by heart. I see it 😊

So if your master is at 23,976 fps how you conform this to 24 fps for dcp?

Bom video!

Is there gonna be a different runtime between 23.976 and 24 fps? If yea how many second different from 2 hour movie?

Thank you very much man. 💚 Such a in-depth research you have put in this video. Very helpful. Lots of love🌿

Great video, thanks a ton!

This was amazing!

Thanks for doing this video!

Wrong. No one shoots PAL in Brazil as far as i know

Clearest explanation I’ve come across, thank you. Still stuck though, can you help me out?

1. If NTSC ran into problems with colour and slowed down 30 to 29.976, and 24 to 23.976, why didn’t PAL do the same for 25?
2. Can you explain more about DVB-T, ATSC, ISDB-T, DTMB? So can they all display true 24 and 60 fps? What about 25 fps in PAL regions? Do PAL and NTSC regions still exist?
3. So, what is the point of my camera shooting 23.976? Why don’t we all shoot 24, and let NTSC TV slow down the playback at 0.1%? Alternatively, why not just shoot true 24 because all modern TVs can display it anyway? Is it something to do with the electronics in the camera?
4. You say delivering at 24 is obviously for DCP projection at digital theatres. So do you mean that if I shoot and deliver at 23.976, it won’t project properly? Why don’t we all shoot and deliver true 24 if TVs can display it anyway? Why is there still this issue with 24, 25, 30 fps, depending on NTSC/PAL regions of 50/60Hz?
5. So what happens if I shoot 23.976 and deliver at 24? Will there be duplicated frames? Or does it become shorter in length? Vice versa, what if I shoot true 24 and deliver at 23.976? Are there skipped frames? Or does it become longer? Likewise, what about compatibility with 25 fps? Say, if 23.976 or 24 was to be broadcast in PAL regions, which you mention have been replaced?

I’m asking all this because after watching your video, I still don’t know to shoot true 24 or 23.976, or 25 for that matter. Nor what format to deliver in and if it matters at all.

So, if I have some footage in 23,976fps, some footage in real 24fps, and one drone shot in 29,976fps and I wanna do one video with all of these footage, what can I do for smooth result? What timeline and export fps settings do you recommend? Thanks a lot.

Waiting for you to upload the other videos you mentioned in this video

He just copied Filmmaker IQ. Just google their channel

The strip of 35mm film, you showing is not from 35 motion picture camera! but from still camera.....

Outstanding. Subscribed already. Thank you for this.

You should avoid both frame frames. Both frame rates belongs to last century. 24fps is a must NO and 23.98 it could pass cause you can easily convert to 30 and 60. But avoid both frame rates at all costs. Those frame rates are unicorn, don’t exist in today’s monitors and displays and will cause you many problems.

Thank you for this video, very helpful 👏🏻

Thank you for this video and nice quote at the end

😎🤏
😏🕶️🤏
Smooth.

Dragonball Z in Japan was dub on 23,976 fps!

If you can't really understand him, please turn on subtitles/captions.

thank you, awesome. how to convert 23.976fps edited footage to 24fps. without audio drift?