Previously Unknown Complex Lifeforms Dominated Earth 1.6 Billion Years Ago

Antonion transformation 😂

It's always good when a presenter includes the geological time-perood in talks like this... so thanks because, yes "The Boring Billion" counts as a geological time period to most of us.

Your a dominant biological force,Anton! Thanks for all the great material, sir. 🙏

Darwinism is incorrect. Intelligent Design is truth 😊

the real antonian transformation was when anton aka toni the great emperor of tonisia stepped down down throne to communicate science to the masses

They're sooo cuuute!

I alway find it funny… when I was young things were blank years old then as I got older science more refined ect the age changes again an again. Why not just say old vs a ruff date lol ? Just odd to me

something is going on with golgi bodies

invertabrits swim at night too

😅😅😅😅satguru dev ki jay 😅😅

It was a time when cholesterol was a good thing

there isnt much time for us to prove anything of this spend ur time smarter , think about what matters because we r all dead sooner or later ,and dont blind ur self by some stupid theories that will most likekly get debunked 100 years from now.

Was this life multicellular?

This has been my favorite channel recently and I just want to say Anton, you’re doing amazing and important work with these videos. I managed to get my cousin hooked on your videos and he’s never really cared about science before so I’m glad that you’ve taken it upon yourself to break down and explain scientific papers and studies and make it easy to understand. Thank you for everything you do :)

surely the best place to look would be he layers of stable compounded material at the bottom of the sea, there could even be preserved specimens due to the cold anoxic conditions...

I have been wondering what may have may have been on Earth at that Time that could have died out during the Neoproterozoic Oxygenation Event, which MUST have been a Mass Extinction Event, and we just wouldn't know what went extinct. This is a fascinating Step towards an Answer -- it doesn't answer very much, but it's a good Step and I appreciate that. Thank you for sharing. :)

Random, but I love your cadence its both soothing and informative lol

Wonderful comment from a wonderful person to another wonderful person regarding a wonderful video

Physics indicates life is a requirement of the universe to maximize entropy, and other possibilities...
And, seemingly, everywhere we look for life, if we look long and hard enough, we find it...reinforcing what other branches of science say about reality.
So, logically, we can assume based on what we know with language and chemistry and material science and make some possible inferences: life can and will find a language that speaks to its environment...
And we call that another name, evolution, but in religion, it's called Shakti in Hinduism or Animus in Latin.
We have not yet begun to consider energy based life...as we ought to.

I am wondering when did the ozone layer first form in the Earth's atmosphere? Perhaps the constant exposure of primitive life on Earth to UV radiation from the Sun hindered evolution of more complex life until there was sufficient oxygen in the atmosphere to allow creation of the ozone layer to shield organisms from deadly UV rays?

It hasn't even been 1 billion years since the cambrian explosion so it's kind of unbelievable that nothing happened for that 1 billion years evolutionwise.

No wonder I'm lazy as heck there was some of my ancestor that did nothing during that boring billion lmao. Jokes aside that is one amazing discovery.

Very cool Anton. Thank you for being you

AAAAHHHAAAAAHAHAH HE'S GOT JOKES!!!

Not all eukaryotic cells have mitochondria. Some specialized cells have evolved to function without mitochondria or with reduced mitochondrial activity. These cells rely on alternative mechanisms for energy production.

One example is red blood cells (erythrocytes) in mammals. During their maturation process, red blood cells eliminate their nucleus and other organelles, including mitochondria. As a result, they do not have mitochondria and rely solely on anaerobic metabolism for energy production.

Similarly, some types of cells in the lens and cornea of the eye, as well as certain cells in the inner ear, have reduced or absent mitochondria. These cells have adapted to utilize alternative energy sources or rely on neighboring cells for energy supply.

what were the organisms in the photos you used?

Anton, you beautiful man, you're the first way I heard this news!

Well let's use this time machine I just invented to travel back 800,000,000 years to see what happened to cause the boring billion to come to an end. Sorry, got a bit of a cold at the moment.

Everything you act perplexed by is answered by acknowledging the reality of solar induced cyclical catastrophism.

I'd like to add wind power to the solar power i have too.
But having a sloped 20° roof with lots of tree near makes it hard.
(Not to mention the government and whether they'd allow it)
Either way, it would have to be cheap, and i think that is where this story ends.
I would not mind if it was low yield say 0.4 kw/h (as an average)
So really, how do i make one my self for cheap ?

Yes ! Protosterol Biota ! Just like minecraft , reality just keeps updating. Yes yes Go science ! Go anton !

I haven't seen the paper but what if protosterols, being more primitive, grew relatively easily into larger molecules or polymers than sterols. Then, presumably, sterols would arise from mostly catabolic transformation of protosterols.

Thus, in a world of both protosterol-based and sterol-based microorganisms, we can imagine it to be more energetically favorable for sterol-based organisms to feed on protosterol-based ones than the other way around. For protosterol-based organisms to build protosterols from sterols, more energy might tend to be needed than in producing sterols from protosterols.

If that was the case, such a difference, over time, might have significantly contributed to sterol-based life pushing protosterol-based lifeforms into extinction.

Sterol-based lifeforms might also have been able to evolve and diversify faster than protosterol ones, which would also contribute to their complete takeover.

Sterol-based life would have evolved into some lifeforms that could feed off other sterol-based organisms, instead of, or on top of, protosterol-based ones. It means they could survive, multiply, and continue to evolve, even though protosterol-based life became rare. They might have decoupled from that which, originally, they ate. If sterol-based life (populations) stopped being a function of protosterol-based life, the predator-prey equilibrium would disappear, same way we could finish all cornflakes and survive on milk alone.

Y’all just believe anything lmao

Well, at least I've got 'something' to be proud of?

Initial life spent a "billion..." years not really doing anything.

Go figure?

"Antonion Transformation" 😂😂😂
I need a haircut now too...

Can anyone show just one Observable evidence of Darwinian evolution? This is the core of the scientific method. Can you observe one Kind turning into another Kind?
 Remember the fairytale about a 🐸 turning into a 🤴 from a kiss. Another version is were a 🐸 turnes into a 🤴 from time.
Cats are cats, dog's are dog's, bacteria are bacteria, 🐸's are 🐸's.

Anton. You are a brilliant man. Your mother is looking at you through the multiverse with the most joyous pride. Also, I like your new hair ...

BUT DID THE EGYPTIANS REALLY BUILD THE PYRAMIDS OR WAS IT NEPHALEM ALIEN ANGEL THINGSY, WHICH ON IS MORE LIKELY, YOU DECIDE, US CRITICAL THINKERS ARE ON THE INTERDIMENSIONAL GIANT ANNUNAKI BIRD PEOPLE DOING IT

The time span of prokaryotes to eukaryotes is way longer than time span between most basic eukaryotes to humans walking on moon. That is mind blowing if valid.

Anton-ion transformation

This was actually terrific, so used to ai's now so it's nice to hear an actual human going off

the Antonian Transformation Effect (ATE)is us getting smarter!
Thank you!

Never stop making vídeos, thanks Anton ❤

One quibble: prokaryotes are not "extremely simple"! 🧐

"Older samples show us signs of various algae, which could have been eukaryotic as well"

Could have been?????? They most definetely were, because all algae are eukaryotic. If it's not eukaryotic then it's not algae

This is giving me multiple organisms.