Sandeep Reddy Vanga Vs. Critics | Animal | The Good, Bad & The Ugly

Sandeep Reddy Vanga Vs. Critics | Animal | The Good, Bad & The Ugly

Tried&Refused Productions.

6 месяцев назад

305,116 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@TriedRefusedProductions
@TriedRefusedProductions - 22.12.2023 08:37

The SALAAR review goes live tomorrow!
Stuck at a wedding (not mine) in a remote place!

Ответить
@TheSocialpolice
@TheSocialpolice - 30.01.2024 13:21

My opinion completely changed after seeing 'Animal' today on netflix. It was bloody amazing. I did go for the hearsay and the view portrayed by some in the industry and I am soooo wrong! I wish i had seen it in the cinema. It is great acting by Ranbir and Anil Kapoor stood out too. Cinematography, fast paced screenplay kept me involved till much after the titles run and into 'Animal Park' the next one that shall also blow the audiences. Most of all, its absolutely well done execution by the director, Sandeep Vanga Reddy. You sir, if reading this must take a bow!

Ответить
@rosewater6778
@rosewater6778 - 29.01.2024 17:27

Animal was bloody brilliant. I was also spewing venom on the film and as a result I missed it on the big screen and had to watch in on OTT. Am damn pissed about this.
The "shoe" scene has been completely taken out of context by Javed Akhtar. In fact there are scenes where the protagonist is sitting at the feet of his sisters and later wife with love and respect among 100s of scenes where the protagonist is vulnerable/unsure/getting slapped by his elders and never grudges it.
So there is something very fishy about this negative propaganda. I more than suspect that there is something else that Javed chacha didn't like about this film and this "shoe licking" distraction is a decoy for that. 😂
As a woman, I'm totally chill with what you have done in Animal. It's a work of masterful subversion and this director is clearly a genius!
There is of course this unhinged left that comprises a set of semi-literate virtue signalling clowns, who having learnt some useful jargon like "toxic masquilinity" to be bandied about as a hallmark of their academic credibility.

Ответить
@Green_Earth6233
@Green_Earth6233 - 29.01.2024 13:20

Bollywood Hate Musculinity They Want To Impose Gay Culture

Ответить
@umamaheswaria9
@umamaheswaria9 - 29.01.2024 07:36

Be the genuine man says..what is a mov problem metic ..he is absolutely dumb ass..so the movie is absolutely against women..he is the male chavnist..so he direct the ugly..only thing is sandeep ready vanga is real animal..

Ответить
@shanu2576
@shanu2576 - 29.01.2024 01:56

Just saw the movie and every moment was cringe.

Ответить
@monikabhandari5908
@monikabhandari5908 - 17.01.2024 00:45

You guys call yourself critics but director ko literally spoon feed karna pad raha hai tumhe in interview tab jaake you r getting those things which even normal audience understood by just watching the movie

Ответить
@castafioreomg
@castafioreomg - 16.01.2024 15:19

A cinematically uneducated is complaining critics are uneducated, hypocrisy hoti hai😂

Ответить
@raider1893
@raider1893 - 14.01.2024 13:37

Jammy saying vanga shouldn't get angry on critics if he was in his shoes he'll be celebrating. You yourself were whinning writing paras after ppl questioned your too negative dunki trailer review.

Ответить
@Vedangi_
@Vedangi_ - 13.01.2024 15:39

Koi iss admi ko Gangs of wassepur dikhao yrr

Ответить
@Amro_spective
@Amro_spective - 12.01.2024 23:35

It's just that he should own up being naturally misogynistic...it's ok every artist should be given the freedom to put their voice out...he gets defensive

Ответить
@madhursurve6363
@madhursurve6363 - 12.01.2024 19:28

Well whoever u r mr! U said SRV should not be bothered by critics and rather enjoy the success! you are completely wrong here. He needs to come out and clarify this and give it back. And because he has given back, there is now a sense of acknowledgment and understanding in audience that these critics are merely of no use and are just playing with our minds. I believe you don’t have any opinion of yourself, would suggest you to try understanding things in whole and put some sense.

Ответить
@user-rp1gj4yo9o
@user-rp1gj4yo9o - 09.01.2024 20:46

I expected better from jammy . But after the whole debacle with animal not a fan anymore .

Ответить
@maheshnaira437
@maheshnaira437 - 09.01.2024 16:13

Ok finally i don't understand what you wanted to say about sandeep reddy vanga

Ответить
@hardikshukla9668
@hardikshukla9668 - 09.01.2024 06:41

No you are illiterate. Vanga is least creative and more vulgar. On the most violent movie name what vanga served is a pathetic disease called Animal.
He will never be a versatile director, he will create hype only by including and creating such scenes which will create hype and his weakness as a director will be hidden behind such scenes.

Ответить
@rajendranimmagadda8791
@rajendranimmagadda8791 - 06.01.2024 20:48

Sandeep Reddy gets angry about the critics in bollywood because.. they are not actual movie critics...they are planted by certain people within the bollywood movie industry...who even rightfully Kangana calls them as Movie Mafia...
They are always trying to create perceptions and trying to influence outcomes...

Ответить
@kuntalghosh1970
@kuntalghosh1970 - 06.01.2024 19:35

I was seeing an interview between dibakar Banerjee and sandesh (probably the best interview i saw in recent times)....and then this.... what a difference.

Ответить
@happyhappyhappyjerry
@happyhappyhappyjerry - 06.01.2024 16:46

While there is indeed some problematic content which was not too necessary to be included in the final cut, I think the best thing Vanga did was showing things realistically. Ranvijay talks and speaks the language the way many people speak in real life. Heck, even better was how he showed the impact of just one big fight on him. He lost the ability to listen, smell and taste. He got catheter in his body. His heart was failing. I don’t remember the last time an action hero suffered this much damage after just one big and prolonged battle.

Ответить
@im_goblin_ff4642
@im_goblin_ff4642 - 06.01.2024 09:25

When critics are not criticising Movies but they are criticising Audiance

Ответить
@dipakkamble4792
@dipakkamble4792 - 05.01.2024 19:33

Nobody has seen Arjun Reddy and Kabir Singh .But most of the people have seen " ANIMAL " .

Ответить
@jayantdrummer
@jayantdrummer - 02.01.2024 12:21

It must take guts for reviewers/critics to call themselves "creators"... what do film directors do then?

Ответить
@recipesandsongs8050
@recipesandsongs8050 - 02.01.2024 10:38

Dude. We are the consumers. His movies are utter shiite

Ответить
@ChethanSrinivas
@ChethanSrinivas - 31.12.2023 18:35

Sandeep is surely a great visionary. The art and craft is one of the best. People who are in the field of critiquing don't have the experience of making a movie.

Ответить
@anish315
@anish315 - 31.12.2023 10:06

Waiting for the carnage we'll witness post release of Spirit 🥵

Ответить
@shrutisingh8936
@shrutisingh8936 - 30.12.2023 23:36

The main issue I have with the movie is not misogyny, as I prepared myself for that earlier. For me their was a lack of continuity in the movie. I was genuinely interested in the father-son bond which was highly promoted but least explored to the point that I couldn't find any critical problematic behaviour in the father's character for Rannvijay to behave this way. The violence was not that gruesome either, it was just people flying everywhere. For me it was a movie designed with multiple problemetic instances with a pinch of Godfather as a backdrop story. Only Bobby Deol's character seemed interesting which wasn't explored too. Music was the only plus point for me, rest it was just an average movie. Sandeep Reddy Wanga knows how to hype the movie with his type of audience. For me this guy is mentally sick, calling him a visionary would be a joke in itself.

Ответить
@satanshameer690
@satanshameer690 - 30.12.2023 18:06

We need a psychoanalysis on this dude

Ответить
@avantikaparmar8423
@avantikaparmar8423 - 30.12.2023 10:59

Seems like paid review also been watching your videos from long nd with time it seems like more of defending the actors and cinema than being honest authentic review. hence unsubscribe 🥱

Ответить
@arpitshivhare217
@arpitshivhare217 - 29.12.2023 14:14

Bakwass director 😂

Ответить
@RedMeanLal
@RedMeanLal - 29.12.2023 07:24

T&R wala sabko pata hai kis ideology ko follow karta hai. Animale full right wing movie hai.

Ответить
@castafioreomg
@castafioreomg - 28.12.2023 22:52

Vanga is the male version of Kangna 😅 toxic and bitching always

Ответить
@mobicare55
@mobicare55 - 28.12.2023 18:07

Brother whats ur problem is that vanga criticized only those who is just a few problematic scene not his movie and advice other not to seee just bcs thay dont like it. Honestly Fuck to that critics. Ur taking all it on u and ur types of critics, u can criticized his movie but he can criticized u that not fair. Nobody whats ur review no movies bro if thay like it they will watch. Earn money by doing ur own work and critics it. In my area tumhare jese log jo kisi k kam per apna review deje paisa kamate hai usko "gav ki Fuibaa" bolate haie.😂😂

Ответить
@ahsanarshad918
@ahsanarshad918 - 28.12.2023 17:40

Your analogy with sports is completely off. In sports, those who critique a team are actually sports men or women who have actually played the game but here it’s completely different. What do you know about the set design, sound design or any technicalities of the movie? If you are giving your opinion on the movie as a viewer then it shouldn’t be longer than 30 seconds.

Ответить
@mkre-view4029
@mkre-view4029 - 28.12.2023 11:17

Critics college principal -Anupama Chopra
Professor:Rajeev masand
Students: Suchitra Tyagi
Obedient student-Jammy
It's not about criticising it's about thinking that what Anupama thinks should be agreed by all and trying to be a boss lady..

Ответить
@vaishnavipareek6036
@vaishnavipareek6036 - 28.12.2023 08:28

The thing is Sandeep Reddy Wanga has not done any extraordinary job . Ask any girl who reads books and wattpad. They will find you the better alphamale with a more interesting stories than Animal.

Ответить
@karmakarma9715
@karmakarma9715 - 28.12.2023 07:10

Anupama be like….. shaabde mera hai ….. bole yeh raha hai ….😂

Ответить
@bharathratnani9532
@bharathratnani9532 - 27.12.2023 22:06

Critics sitting in Temperature controlled rooms regurgitation opinions peiced together from other critics, while Vanga manages 1000's of people to put together a film fighting the elements and the expectations.
Critics -10, Vanga 100.
Who gives a rats asa about the so called critics. Vanga the legend.

Ответить
@ThePower2change
@ThePower2change - 27.12.2023 20:50

A lot of us "wish" a lot of things, but as Vanga said, it would have become a 4 hour movie with the intermission. All I can say, as a female, is that I loved the movie, I loved the performances, I loved the music and I loved the flip off! And, maybe Vanga didn't use the right word when he called critics illiterate. I think 'morons' fit them well. How can you not watch a movie and comment on it? Like seriously, akal hai bhi ke nahi?

Ответить
@aggrawalnikhil02
@aggrawalnikhil02 - 27.12.2023 18:49

Think of Joaquin Phoenix from "the master",
Anthony Hopkins from Silence of the lambs or Cristian Bale from American Psycho or Keenu Reaves from John Wick or Al pacino from Godfather. These movies have way more complex, crazy and aggressive characters than what Ranbir Kapoor is in Animal. I am talking more in the context of absurdity and limits of acceptability.
When you can accept these with Oscars, then why criticize Animal Movie ?

Ответить
@LakshmiSrikhandpur
@LakshmiSrikhandpur - 27.12.2023 18:28

Enough of this illogical movie and it’s copy pasted scenes

Ответить
@Vdheeraj93
@Vdheeraj93 - 27.12.2023 17:29

The problem with present day critics is, they will criticize indian movies like they own them.. but when comes to hollywood movies like 50 shades of grey, kill bill.. they will praise very well..
Including yourself my man..

Ответить
@ananyadeb1884
@ananyadeb1884 - 27.12.2023 15:31

Is it just me that even being a woman I understood Ranvijay's character? Yes the cheating part is not justified but Tripti Dimri's character could have been incorporated in a better way as it seems Ranvijay & her child will play an important role in the second part

Ответить
@deepakostwal2905
@deepakostwal2905 - 27.12.2023 12:40

Keep crying

Ответить
@maryamrashid8927
@maryamrashid8927 - 27.12.2023 12:21

Hi Jammy just wanted to ask if he is taking God father story line and scenes from scar face which angle do you think he he is a creative director from if he is coping someone else's work.

Ответить
@satyakamdipakraut5225
@satyakamdipakraut5225 - 27.12.2023 11:37

Some aspects of the movie don't make sense.
Like if Ranvijay had promised his wife he won't cheat , and then when Tripti danry came into the movie as a mole , there was no reason for him to sleep with her.
This was in my opinion the main reason why they split up .
Not the name calling not the vitriol this.
Also , in my opinion , vanga also clearly shows the female toxicity at play when Rashmika leaves for US , with their kids , thus alienating a son from his doting father.

Ответить
@waltissussybakka
@waltissussybakka - 27.12.2023 11:21

Just because he is fearless doesn't mean he is not glorying his problematic messaging, when those deserve a matlab kuch bhi I think this deserves the same too

Ответить
@ahmedkamal_ak47
@ahmedkamal_ak47 - 27.12.2023 10:52

Now the question is where do you fall jammy?
Do you call yourself a critic or a reviewer?
Reply after careful thinking.

Ответить
@hirengondalia5460
@hirengondalia5460 - 27.12.2023 10:48

Yeah He is Right in terms of films 😅 They didn’t work in Films How would they know what is good or bad …

Ответить
@maverickind1311
@maverickind1311 - 27.12.2023 10:08

He said Illiterate when it comes to films.

Ответить
@justatroll4282
@justatroll4282 - 27.12.2023 10:01

I don't understand people who are saying it's clearly 'not a hero' story and anyone who thinks this will influence society are snowflakes, are the same/similar folks who were hooting in the theatre during all the messed up scenes and his rather icky dialogue.

Ответить