Jordan Peterson on Gender, Patriarchy and the Slide Towards Tyranny

i hope they payed him in these interview of him whitstanding large amounts of anoyance! OMG, masterful patience and self control by JP, remarkable true Gentleman

Jordan one of the GOAT

Here in 2025 listening to JBP be absolutely and prophetically right.

Not a good interviewer, it’s one thing to ask difficult questions, it’s another to ask gotcha questions. She can’t accept any of his answers/responses and wags her metaphorical finger to him.

Camera work is awful with Jordan's face obscured by the mike...

Lady is clinically insane.

I debated in college and afterwards for fun/education/ discourse. She is a conniving disingenuous person. She is not trying to enter in the discourse. She is setting traps and trying to set them off by utilizing his exact word terminology instead of debating his objective point.

Facts not feelings!!!! No one cares about how you feel. I care about the factual truth of the scientific method

I am appalled, as a woman who has criticized men for the habit of interrupting, that this woman never let her guest finish a sentence. The constant talking-over, stepping on the end of every point, made this painful to try to follow. She comes off as a bully, he comes 9ff as deferential and civilized. What a switch!

This woman sounds like she has a mouthful of marbles. Or is it a speech impediment?

Woman is a daft idiot.

What a miserable interviewer. She wasn’t objective at all and was obviously offended by any opportunity to THINK Mr. Peterson was damming women (which he never did). She is a classic case of a miserable representation of women with a noticeable chip on her shoulder. No match for his intelligence and that was obviously a portion of what fueled his frustration. On numerous occasions, she wanted to turn inexplicably irrefutable scientifically proven data and make it his opinion, so she could in turn make him out to be the ‘bad guy’. Mission failed! Very rude and disrespectful she was.

Well handled, Mr. Peterson!

It is not about beliefs or how you feel. This is the problem with what has happened in the last 10 or so years. We are pushing this narrative that it is about how you feel. It is OK to do something if it makes you feel good, it is OK to leave that way because it makes you feel good, it is OK to push a set of belief because it makes you feel good. Life is not about feelings. Feelings are a byproduct of human reactions to a given environment. Classic liberalism, classic, self-help, and traditional views are not about feelings. They are about merit and achieving something great by the some total of society‘s effort. The downstream effect of that is that you feel good about the society you’re part of. Now it is about how you feel and not about the society that you’re part of. That is why we are more divided than ever. Because everybody has put themselves into groups where people alive by their feelings and not about what’s right. A set of life principles to live by is nonnegotiable because it’s not about feelings, rather doing the right thing. We have upended and destroyed both men and women because institutions have told them that the thing they enjoyed and we’re good at we’re not making them feel good.

Jordan: “Unless you’re willing to say women are not aggressive”

Crazy lady: “Why do women have to do anything?”

Question:”Are you for real, lady?”

The year the KKK endorsed don first took power JD Vance called Trump "cultural heroin" and "America's Hitler" but must've meant that as a compliment as Vance trips with the toxic cartel pushing Musk, kleptocracy, antivaccine idiocracy, Hegseth, Gaetz, revamped versions of fugitive slave laws and the accelerator on climate driven human extinction; and whether they like it or not, no one is asking, How could Germans support a known felon rapist fascist bigoted sociopath?

She has 28 bits of paper she mentions and being at the same time very aware simultaneously his book at the top of the book chart to meet suggest a strong agenda to be thrown or weaken his prominence and therefore make room for somebody else

I’m not woke but Peterson’s biological determinism makes me sick. The same as extreme left , just the other end of the spectrum.

What an obnoxious interviewer.

How is she aloud to interview she has no clue she just keeps giving sarcastic views

It’s all ifs with her

Her intelligence is nonexistent let alone squared. Embarrassing.

This woman is beyond belief: she doesn’t understand what Peterson is talking about, so seems to think that that means he is wrong. She admits, implicitly, that she doesn’t understand, and when Jordan Peterson gets three words into an explanation, she interrupts with another inane statement. This is one of the worst interviews I have ever heard!

Jordan speaks with factual, reasoned views. This woman lets n

Feminist:partri, alpha male...blabla...

Good gawd she's a bad listener

What a terrible interviewer. Let the guest you invited speak and respect their experience and credentials. If you disagree, then use an intelligent argument, not just BS obstructionism

Poor woman, she struggled a lot.

Ms. Annie Lööfs needs to talk to her psychiatrist first.

Jordan Peterson is a deeply polarizing figure whose critiques of neo-Marxism and postmodernism often oversimplify complex intellectual traditions, conflating them into a monolithic “enemy” that fuels cultural anxiety. While he champions individual responsibility, his lack of concrete solutions to systemic issues makes his philosophy appear superficial. Despite claiming ideological neutrality, Peterson promotes conservative values and capitalizes on cultural controversies, such as his opposition to Canada’s Bill C-16, which many experts debunked as alarmist. His rhetoric often caricatures progressive movements, fostering division rather than dialogue. Ultimately, Peterson’s approach leans more toward polemics than constructive intellectualism, making him popular but limited in fostering meaningful societal change.

Cited from Wikipedia...
Anne McElvoy, the interviewer attended St Bede's RC Comprehensive School in Lanchester, County Durham,[3] and read German and Philosophy at Wadham College, Oxford.[4] While at Oxford University, she edited Cherwell, the student newspaper.[5] She spent a year at the Humboldt University of Berlin, then in East Berlin, studying East German literature and censorship.[6] I am curious to hear Anne share what she learned from her study of literature and censorship in East Germany.

I had to look up the host name, i think ill forget again

I feel bad for Jordan Peterson when he tries to talk sense or when Debating woke people because it’s hard to reason with crazy

At the beginning I was glad to see that this podcast was somewhat reasonable. However around 24 minutes in the host clearly showed her allegiance and began disregarding science itself. It's honestly scary that she was willing to sacrifice evidence to the idea that women and men are the exact same somehow.

Jbp

Another hyper-feminist with an agenda based on opinion rather than listening to the evidence. Why does Anne assume all women want to occupy the C suite when most do not AND most men do not. Its not about men and women, it's about personality traits, traits not affected by social pressure.

She gladly accepts any and all negative traits identified with male behavior but challenge anything she perceives as negative about women. So the data is only valid about men and women are far too complex and varied to be analyzed it seems.

视频内容非常精彩！我有一点困惑：有人给我转usdt，我有恢复短语。「pride」-「pole」-「obtain」-「together」-「second」-「when」-「future」-「mask」-「review」-「nature」-「potato」-「bulb」 我该如何提取它们呢？

Slide toward tyranny? He got that right, just pointed in the wrong direction.

Wow, Anne McElvoy is a senior editor in the economist! They have real problems with Human Resources. The level of ignorance and lack of logic Anne Showed speaks really bad about this project.

At 23.40 when he began to break down the differences between the male and female brain on the extreme ends of the curve, you can see the interviewer just stop listening and begin fiddling with paperwork. She was not even interested in hearing a counter-arguement.

This is why the ECOMMUNIST used to be a good magazine, before when it was the economist.

Thank god this stupid clam isnt in charge of anything. She could easily aet women back at least 20 years. She is why some men still say women have smaller brains than men

There are only 2 answers she would have accepted for any one of her questions:
1. Men need to correct their bad behaviors, thereby changing society and improving women's lives.
2. Women are currently (and have always) done everything right, so men and society have to change in order to improve women's lives.

She asks decent questions, which is rare, but sadly, she doesn't listen to the answers, which is quite common with JBP interviewers.

Who’s here, Nov. 2024 , post US election?
She’s so smug and dismissive.
Funny how all the trans studies are reversed 6 years after this video

In Singapore, the hypocrisy is unacceptable. Within govt, the employees uphold woke culture despite the leader against it. Narcissistic feminists, who are against fathers (especially minorities) and pro-independent women, uprooting the ever-essential evergreen family unit and home, exist throughout the govt in particular the MSF, which ironically supposedly meant to support families but they actually work actively to even undermine innocent fathers by alleging their innocent children as having suicidal thoughts (in one example at age 9! even when the child, Sarah Sophia, denies it) and even falsely accused the father of being unsound and when they are cornered by facts, they hide behind govt armor, even committing perjury by alleging men as terrorists out of the blue and out of thin air, with no evidences and proofs to support their allegations just because they are more concerned with their fat bonuses and longevity in their posts as "civil servants", rather than the sanctity and the sovereignty of the family unit. Constant gaslighting, the targeted family members were made to second guess each other, the mother incited to seek divorce, forcing the family to face uncertainty and financial burdens while incessantly maligning the father, the husband, the man as if there is an aggressive campaign against citizens in favor of foreigner women. No validating violence, nothing untoward between father and child etc, yet their shortsightedness and ruthless tunnel vision persist, completely ignoring a child protesting against them who remained cold and uncouth hiding her after taking her away against her will. This was reported to UNICEF and OHCHR. The truths what the strangers did to her behind our backs need to come out. Govts should not be equated with nations, people need to know the difference. No point incessantly maligning men for the sake of Womens' Charter, when we all know this day and age, women can be as equally bad and we know for a fact that for so many years the child has been constantly saying and drawing in her journals that her bullies were adult women strangers. People forget that the child will grow up too to become a woman, yet her voice is deliberately suppressed. As if the expert feels the pain, but not her. They are just numb while trying to get everyone dumb into their bandwagon. Everybody knows the child is missing home and her father; people have witnessed how much the child is close to the father and prefers the father yet just because the govt employees, self-made kings and queens because of their high horses in their govt jobs, always think they are right even when they are clearly wrong (the epitome of kiasuism)...Experts are good people? Just because of technocracy, they tirelessly attempt to brainwash the child to convince her she does not need her natural father...how evil is that? Noone dares to speak on behalf of the child and the father, just because they assume that the government is clean all the time...until one day when you least expect it you too may get caught in similar positions...this is the problem when obsequiousness and lack of transparency prevails and lack of empathy and compassion permeates top down throughout society: the common man and the basics like home and family are being threatened, if it goes unbridled, for sure humanity and humankind too are at risks when the younger generations grow up not having a happy childhood but a deviant preconception of life what govts condone and allow to foster and fester in a child's memories by their absurd unnecessary interference

I really don't know how JP can handle those interviews for that long. The man brings a lot of information, studies, predictions, experience and she comes with: "No, you're wrong. My neighbor, who is a woman, kicked a bird on the street yesterday and didn't say sorry, right after her husband cried and begged her not to do it anymore. So, she is more aggressive and he is emotional!" Bahhh...come on! Those feminists just can't listen a thing