Комментарии:
CRAZYYYYYYY
Ответитьno way you even play the piano... who is this guy???? <3
Ответитьi would of appreciated the use of math to prove the, 0.3, i dont understand how the ability to force makes it less likely to have a bomb
Ответитьso generally speaking, if I place a bomb in a guessing spot such that it reveals a lot of logic, it is a bad move?
ОтветитьI enjoyed the piano in background
ОтветитьWhy are many forced moves an indicator that something is wrong? There are many open positions, why is it not just at consequence of that?
ОтветитьI think I akso once stumbled across a 0,something chance. If I happen to find someting like this again, I'll send you a screenshot :)
Ответитьnever thought about it like that
ОтветитьI once saw someone blast from a 0.5% cell
ОтветитьI saw this like 30 minutes ago, lmao
Ответитьi love you Mine Buoy
ОтветитьOk but was it a bomb though
Ответитьnice piano 👍
ОтветитьI've had 0.3% chances before AND blew up clicking on them.
ОтветитьPiano was cool
ОтветитьI've had one position where I was able to chord off a 7, that's gotta be rarer than an 8
ОтветитьI’ve never used this intuition in normal minesweeper but there’s a different version on puzzle madness where it becomes very apparent that the square with the least impact on the rest of the puzzle is often the one to pick. If you haven’t tried that version I recommend it. With that version you solve it like sudoku, filling out the whole board without knowing if you’re right until the end
ОтветитьTheoretically wouldn't the percentages be calculated by considering all possibilities of placement in the remaining tiles, then just tallying what percentage of them each spot was a hit?
Ответитьwow that's super interesting
Ответитьthe reveal that it was you playing the piano and not some stock music was mind blowing :o
ОтветитьHow did you get the probability numbers on tiles which haven't been clicked yet?
Ответитьvery interesting and as always wonderful editing and music
ОтветитьWoah really? 8! is a really rare number! Its gotta be at least larger than 10.
ОтветитьI was convinced that there would be a twist at the end where he clicks it and it turns out to be bomb.
ОтветитьReally nice one! Now I understand Minesweepers better. Nice piano playing btw
ОтветитьPretty cool. Minesweeper just decided to throw this at him until he also decided he'd casually just explain the whole thing
Ответитьi've never gotten 0.3 mines before, only integers
ОтветитьThat’s sickkkk 🔥
Ответить0.3
ОтветитьSuper-duper 0.3
ОтветитьYou are still good at piano indeed 😏
ОтветитьDude... take a break and have a rest. I can't imagine why you played minesweeper non-stop for 7 years.
ОтветитьIs there a writeup somewhere explaining how the software used to calculate the exact probabilities works?
ОтветитьWhat the lowest possible percent chance that could occur (that’s not 0)?
ОтветитьSo you are saying, that when it would be extremely useful for a tile to hold a bomb, then it's most certainly not a bomb. Great.
ОтветитьI really liked your explanation!
ОтветитьWho plays minesweeper like that though? You could have worked out those bomb positions by any number of tiles and you wouldnt need to guess at all
Ответитьbuy a pop filter dude
ОтветитьI aprob of luck
ОтветитьIs playing for win streak fundamentally the same as playing for mastery? Currently the only thing really “lacking” in my minesweeper account is my win streak, which is 4.
ОтветитьI have enjoyed the piano
Ответить