Never have I seen this before...

Never have I seen this before...

Mine Buoy

4 месяца назад

26,328 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@Orufj
@Orufj - 09.03.2024 22:27

CRAZYYYYYYY

Ответить
@giovannicanazza5305
@giovannicanazza5305 - 09.03.2024 22:36

no way you even play the piano... who is this guy???? <3

Ответить
@2consciences
@2consciences - 09.03.2024 22:36

i would of appreciated the use of math to prove the, 0.3, i dont understand how the ability to force makes it less likely to have a bomb

Ответить
@zalut_sky
@zalut_sky - 09.03.2024 23:02

so generally speaking, if I place a bomb in a guessing spot such that it reveals a lot of logic, it is a bad move?

Ответить
@GusGonQue
@GusGonQue - 09.03.2024 23:09

I enjoyed the piano in background

Ответить
@health_doc
@health_doc - 10.03.2024 00:31

Why are many forced moves an indicator that something is wrong? There are many open positions, why is it not just at consequence of that?

Ответить
@frustrato_potato3081
@frustrato_potato3081 - 10.03.2024 01:22

I think I akso once stumbled across a 0,something chance. If I happen to find someting like this again, I'll send you a screenshot :)

Ответить
@ginge3845
@ginge3845 - 10.03.2024 01:23

never thought about it like that

Ответить
@Digby8
@Digby8 - 10.03.2024 03:03

I once saw someone blast from a 0.5% cell

Ответить
@Plyometric
@Plyometric - 10.03.2024 05:40

I saw this like 30 minutes ago, lmao

Ответить
@gamerboy7224
@gamerboy7224 - 10.03.2024 05:58

i love you Mine Buoy

Ответить
@CaptainMonkeyFez
@CaptainMonkeyFez - 10.03.2024 08:58

Ok but was it a bomb though

Ответить
@guesswho2232
@guesswho2232 - 10.03.2024 09:18

nice piano 👍

Ответить
@Cyclone001c
@Cyclone001c - 10.03.2024 09:37

I've had 0.3% chances before AND blew up clicking on them.

Ответить
@cadaeib65
@cadaeib65 - 10.03.2024 10:01

Piano was cool

Ответить
@iwersonsch5131
@iwersonsch5131 - 10.03.2024 10:12

I've had one position where I was able to chord off a 7, that's gotta be rarer than an 8

Ответить
@ar_xiv
@ar_xiv - 10.03.2024 10:37

I’ve never used this intuition in normal minesweeper but there’s a different version on puzzle madness where it becomes very apparent that the square with the least impact on the rest of the puzzle is often the one to pick. If you haven’t tried that version I recommend it. With that version you solve it like sudoku, filling out the whole board without knowing if you’re right until the end

Ответить
@gblargg
@gblargg - 10.03.2024 11:26

Theoretically wouldn't the percentages be calculated by considering all possibilities of placement in the remaining tiles, then just tallying what percentage of them each spot was a hit?

Ответить
@kataryn
@kataryn - 10.03.2024 13:48

wow that's super interesting

Ответить
@morphious86.
@morphious86. - 10.03.2024 14:09

the reveal that it was you playing the piano and not some stock music was mind blowing :o

Ответить
@12carbon
@12carbon - 10.03.2024 15:51

How did you get the probability numbers on tiles which haven't been clicked yet?

Ответить
@agost92
@agost92 - 10.03.2024 16:49

very interesting and as always wonderful editing and music

Ответить
@Eryna_
@Eryna_ - 10.03.2024 17:01

Woah really? 8! is a really rare number! Its gotta be at least larger than 10.

Ответить
@TF2Llama
@TF2Llama - 10.03.2024 17:06

I was convinced that there would be a twist at the end where he clicks it and it turns out to be bomb.

Ответить
@BonBon-uv6tl
@BonBon-uv6tl - 10.03.2024 17:37

Really nice one! Now I understand Minesweepers better. Nice piano playing btw

Ответить
@gaimnbro9337
@gaimnbro9337 - 10.03.2024 18:47

Pretty cool. Minesweeper just decided to throw this at him until he also decided he'd casually just explain the whole thing

Ответить
@BGDMusic
@BGDMusic - 10.03.2024 18:49

i've never gotten 0.3 mines before, only integers

Ответить
@captainmorgan6583
@captainmorgan6583 - 10.03.2024 21:05

That’s sickkkk 🔥

Ответить
@pscl_0
@pscl_0 - 10.03.2024 21:05

0.3

Ответить
@fabiogirotto5516
@fabiogirotto5516 - 10.03.2024 21:05

Super-duper 0.3

Ответить
@alessandrociampa983
@alessandrociampa983 - 10.03.2024 21:06

You are still good at piano indeed 😏

Ответить
@Portponky
@Portponky - 11.03.2024 00:22

Dude... take a break and have a rest. I can't imagine why you played minesweeper non-stop for 7 years.

Ответить
@marttielvisto3519
@marttielvisto3519 - 11.03.2024 00:50

Is there a writeup somewhere explaining how the software used to calculate the exact probabilities works?

Ответить
@bodenharris1484
@bodenharris1484 - 11.03.2024 07:35

What the lowest possible percent chance that could occur (that’s not 0)?

Ответить
@andy02q
@andy02q - 11.03.2024 13:55

So you are saying, that when it would be extremely useful for a tile to hold a bomb, then it's most certainly not a bomb. Great.

Ответить
@Juniper-111
@Juniper-111 - 12.03.2024 08:06

I really liked your explanation!

Ответить
@MrGeocym
@MrGeocym - 13.03.2024 02:16

Who plays minesweeper like that though? You could have worked out those bomb positions by any number of tiles and you wouldnt need to guess at all

Ответить
@BigBoyAdvance
@BigBoyAdvance - 13.03.2024 16:11

buy a pop filter dude

Ответить
@aefad
@aefad - 19.03.2024 03:58

I aprob of luck

Ответить
@Plyometric
@Plyometric - 17.04.2024 15:53

Is playing for win streak fundamentally the same as playing for mastery? Currently the only thing really “lacking” in my minesweeper account is my win streak, which is 4.

Ответить
@danielbaumgartner572
@danielbaumgartner572 - 28.06.2024 01:54

I have enjoyed the piano

Ответить