Комментарии:
Thanks for the info...😃
ОтветитьCan it play doom?
ОтветитьBut why? Why is it more energy efficient to break a task (instruction) up into multiple steps instead of having the complicated task supported directly as one operation in hardware?
ОтветитьMaybe in future we can just swap our arm chips like x86 processors
ОтветитьMost confusing title ever seen
ОтветитьDear author thank for providing the clarity.
I recently shift windows environment to Mac environment i have a bit doubt.
I have M2 Macbook Pro. I found some tools avail in aarch64 & x86.
Both are work in my macbook. Do you have any recommendations. Which aarch should i use & why?
Arrch64 or x86
What do you think? Which one is the Future?
ОтветитьNintendo change the game console using arm chip
ОтветитьWow ! 8 mins gave full picture & understanding the diff. thanks mate
ОтветитьI don't think it's that simple. We know that special purpose hardware (like ASICs) can flatten CPUs head to head, so the idea of CISC can't be all wrong. And ARM has now a fairly complicated instruction set. Maybe the CISC instructions are mismatched to needs, maybe it all comes down to the uniform size of the ARM instructions, and maybe it comes down to subtleties of the hardware that nobody outside TSMC and Intel could explain.
ОтветитьHe is good in explaining and well researched! Thanks.
ОтветитьARM can't Beat x86 in Gaming
ОтветитьIn future if ARM totally destroys x86, will the GPU which in PC's are sold separately by Nvdia & Amd will it be replaced by Arm because it's an SOC & Apple already proved that rendering speed in M1 chips are very fast in their own software and in 3d party softwares ?¿
ОтветитьIt's never going to happen cause it's way too expensive.
Ответить