Why is There Absolute Zero Temperature? Why is There a Limit?

Only thing colder than absolute zero is the past

Damnn

NEGATIVE TEMP in Kelvin does exist

We cant get there, but black holes have. Could it be they are triggers for future big bangs? After all they have absorbed the mass of everything by super freezing, could not that cold centre mass get to its critical mass? I think Faraday said that something cant disappear but can transform into different things that when combined have the same weight of the original.
Maybe i just need more grass man.

UK use celius NOT Fahrenheit

What a brilliant narration and content explanation!!

lol that narrator is trying to hard with his voice and trips over his own vocal cords at the end of sentences

it bugs me how u manage to ignore the e=mc2, making ² is easy. there's plenty of ways of type/make one.

Creepy narration

It's called " point one four " not fourteen

Literally cannot listen to this guys voice. Jesus Christ mate do you have to exhale so hard at the end of EVERY SENTENCE?! It sounds like a shit movie trailer from the early 90’s.

Too much words.

energy to energy, but what is the difference? you can catch a cold, die. energy is always flowing. nothing is 100%. it's always 99.99%. that's it. physics? mathematics? but where does the perceptible "radiate" radiation from space come from? Big Bang? but do you know why we know that the stars move away, or galaxies? is the universe really expanding? everything we can observe with our instruments is nothing. everything we see takes a million years for us to perceive. time Machine?

Sets out to explain the arbitrary "why?" question, says it's "philosophical" and moves on to saying what everyone and their mothers already knows. 10/10 useless for answers.

This channel needs a better narrator for their videos. The voice is raspy and this interesting video got to be irritating after a while listening to the heavy raspy voice.

Temperature is not the measurement of the vibrations.
Even though absolute zero is not possible negative temperatures are.

The UK does not use Farenheit. At all. Not sure where he got that gem from.

This type of narration is so ANNOYING!!

Fascinating.

Short answer yes

Job 38

29From whose womb comes the ice?
Who gives birth to the frost from the heavens
30when the waters become hard as stone,
when the surface of the deep is frozen?
31“Can you bind the chains b of the Pleiades?
Can you loosen Orion’s belt?
32Can you bring forth the constellations in their seasons c
or lead out the Bear d with its cubs?
33Do you know the laws of the heavens?
Can you set up God’s e dominion over the earth?

This guy's voice is so over the top, it's hard to concentrate on the content of what he's saying.

multiple inaccuracies and poorly worded points dont believe everything you hear on the internet

Because it's too f-kin cold. But i DIGRESS. The word of 2023. Aahaha!

states of matter

Why you talking like that bro

χαχαχαχα!!! ΣΤΟΥΣ 0 ΦΑΡΕΝΑΙΤ ΕΧΕΙΣ ΤΗΝ ΨΥΧΗ....................................................

I watched an experiment of "trying" to reach absolute zero. What happened was something I can't explain because the liquid suddenly started doing strange things like creating energy. My theory is what I call transenergy and is used by God to build mass. It's more complicated than I can explain in a 4 line comment, but it uses gravity in a way that is not depicted by normal physics. It's the "God factor" and humans aren't designed to understand.

Explanation under 20 sec:
Tempurature shows how fast molecules moving, like speedometer in ur car. At 0 km/h car just not moving, same thing about molecules - they just don't move at -273.15 °C.

Physics is fascinating. There can be temperatures of billions degrees C.
But only -273,15 C. And that cannot be reached in practise.
Celsius is a practical scale for daily use. But while 20C may be perceived as twice as warm as 10C it isn't at all.
Here the problem with Celsius: if you ask: what is twice as high temperature than 0C? Twice of zero is zero so it does not make sence.
Therefore Kelvin is better. The true answer to the question is that twice as high temperature as 0C is 273,15C.
And relatively seen to the possible temperature we live very close to the absolute 0.

The narration is absolutely trash. Those highs and "I'm gonna go as low as possible" are horrendous to hear. It's impossible to understand sometimes. Does every sentence have to sound epic?????

The narrator guy sounds like the English version of Don LaFontaine....In a world where the brothers Celsius and Fahrenheit have taken the vibrations from everything, a new atom rises up to take the heat back.....

There's a lot of coolth here it seems

Bro, this trend of explaining everything about something before you say what it is is the worst way to learn. I know you’re trying to build suspense and keep people watching but omg, it’s so much harder to remember what applies to the subject without the subject. Please try to limit the amount of “build up” you use.

Your eyes turn into quarts when we expire....prove me wrong

We are are walking talking crystals...prove me wrong

Because that's where gravity begins.... duhhh 369.36...f

2023 Americans use Fahrenheit. do Americans understand that nobody uses Fahrenheit?

Although Fahrenheit WAS the most popular scale in the United Kingdom originally, for many years Celsius has been the primary scale used, and it has been taught in schools since the 1970s. (Wikipedia)

So no, only US uses Fahrenheit, a measuring system that makes no sense when you have the logical Celsius ☝😉

UK uses degrees C not F

Originally Celsius actually made the scale 0° for boiling water and 100° for when water freezes. It was changed at a later time.

Painful to watch. Similar to walking through deep mud. I almost made it half-way through before bailing out and moving on to something else👎👎👎.

Dudes voice kinda sounds like the fart cloud from Rick and Morty 😅

In the 1960's I discovered a piece of music by John Cage, called Opus 4'33". It is 4'33" of complete silence. I was very angry because I felt he was a fraud (and because he had beaten me to it). A few years later my physics teacher talked about absolute zero, -273 degrees C. I realised 4'33" was 273", absolute zero, when molecular movement ceased and hence there could be no transmission of sound. Absolute silence. John Cage's concept was brilliant. I realised I was not in his league conceptually, and thus was spared from trying to become a composer.

I truly have never understood the following.
On the Kelvin temperature scale NEGATIVE temperatures are possible.
However Negative Kelvin temperature is hotter than INFINATE Kelvin.
All this has been experimentally proven.
Temperature is a statistical measurement of the energy of the bits (atoms, molecules, etc) in a system.
There are unbounded and bounded systems. Bounded systems have a limit on the number of possible states or arrangement of the bits comprising the system.
Unbounded systems cannot have negative Kelvin temperature.
There are mathematical equations relating Temperature to Entropy.
A bounded systems Entropy decreases when more Energy is added to the system than what the system can hold as defined by the number of possible microstates in the system.
So it all depends on what is meant by the term Temperature. Our intuition of hot and cold cannot describe what really is happening. I find the mathematics of the definition of temperature in terms of Entropy personality incomprehensible .
The equations of temperature in terms of Entropy reveal how negative Kelvin temperature is attained.
Lasers can be used to achieve bounded states exhibiting Negative temperature, but I have never been able to comprehend this result.

Wow, I never knew UK used Fahrenheit scale as a standard in the same way the US does.

You realize you wrote the world's most famous formula wrong?

Minus two hundred and seventy three point one five, not Minus two hundred and seventy three point fifteen.
If sounds so weird and completely wrong to hear an English accent saying the former. The latter is grammatically and mathematically incorrect, as fifteen means five + ten units or degrees C in this case. So to say point one five as point fifteen is wrong. What is it five + ten of? It's five + ten of 1/100ths of a degree, really what he's therefore saying is Minus two hundred and seventy three point fifteen hundredth's of a degree Celsius degrees Celsius. Which is nonsensical.
This is why I don't believe the Moon landings ever took place.

Even using Celsius it's still going to be an arbitrary number absolute zero