Комментарии:
yoo the music is freaking me out dawg
ОтветитьInterestingly, a competent human could have beaten Martin quicker by exploiting the likelihood of bad play. Stockfish is only really trained to play against Stockfish-level opponents, hence it is being ridiculously conservative.
Ответитьbishop leaves g7
Stockfish: Ya done fucked up.
Does any human actually lose to martin without throwing? Even my mom can beat martin, and I'm only 1200 and can beat her in odds game with just 2 knights and pawns...
ОтветитьOkay but can martin win agaisnt stockfish with only one pawn
ОтветитьWhy didn't he take the pawn in the first place ?
ОтветитьStockfish: "Just put me out of my misery."
Martin: *does a random king move instead of pushing a pawn that is two squares from promotion and protected by a rook*
Is stockfish playing as black or white?
ОтветитьI mean, it's more like "can stockfish beat martin using only one queen" and yeah clearly.
now gotta try it with just one rook =p
I don’t believe it. Even a 250 rated player would have taken the pawn.
ОтветитьMartin is just built differently. Generational talent.
Ответитьyes.
ОтветитьI'm wheezing 😂
ОтветитьMartin at 250: never even plays an inaccuracy
Real 250s: one single “good move” in a sea of mistakes and blunders
Had to mute it because the music was absolutely annoying. Thumbs down.
ОтветитьI usually play chess with my younger cousins with Martin because he is designed to blunder. And I was trying to show how to set up an "okay" start, and Martin ended up checkmating me with his queen after only 8 moves by me. I have never felt so attacked. I'm only an 600 ELO so I might have missed a crucial point somewhere.
Ответитьbro who the hell is martin
ОтветитьMartin is the harry maguire of chess
ОтветитьDisclaimer: None of the moves make sense. This is just stockfish waiting for Martin to blunder all his pieces.
But it's funny just how bad the Bot actually is. It's insulting actual 250 elo players.
HOW DID MARTIN LOSE ALL OF HIS PIECES WITHOUT BLUNDERING and then blunder with the queen and NOT EVEN LOSING IT
ОтветитьHow can you let 2 bots play against each other?
ОтветитьHi, my name is Martin, I am not super good at chess but I still find this offencive!
ОтветитьIs your stockfish high?!?! Kd7 is NOT an exellent move
ОтветитьMartin got no blunders. He would totally be able to win against stockfish in any situation.
Ответить"250 elo"
Ответитьnah bro, aint no way
Ответитьstock fish= boby fisher 2*
sike
"You would defeat Martin using only 4 pawns?"
"We would defeat Marin using only 1 pawn!"
Thank you for video
ОтветитьMotovational video to never give up
ОтветитьI love how the pieces can all do emojis—especially at the end when the black king gets mad—but I don't understand the star emoji. Pretty fun seeing the sportsmanship of giving each other thumbs ups during the game.
ОтветитьHe went straight for the jugular
Ответитьmartin is not blundering?
ОтветитьLesson: Martin is mentally handicapped
Ответитьis it possible to lose against martain?
ОтветитьMe and my lil brother playing chess belike:
ОтветитьMartin just didnt want to destroy his fellow robot collegue
ОтветитьStock fish is playing 4d chess predicting predictions. Meanwhile Martin is playing random moves as though he’s never played chess ever in his life
ОтветитьGot to love Stockfish complimenting its own moves the entire game. Also despite allowing the pawn to promote, Martin actually held up pretty well, which made the game intense to watch. It really just came down to one fatal mistake.
Ответитьleave martin alone😭
ОтветитьAm i that bad at making best moves or ia this not martin
ОтветитьObviously not. The pawn needed the support of the king several times to win the game against Martin.
ОтветитьMartin should stop playing chess and should play ludo at his point
ОтветитьI can't believe it, it was as easy as using the opening to capture that pawn
ОтветитьMartin is designed to be looser. It would be more interesting if Stockfish would have normal set and Martin one pawn with goal for Stockfish to loose.
ОтветитьLmao Martin is number 1 dumbass could’ve easily created a passed pawn but blundered
ОтветитьBoth played bad lmao
ОтветитьAm i the only confused here?
ОтветитьMartyn, that wasn’t very sm-AHA-rt.
Ответить