4 Logical Paradoxes!!

Ist a heap of sand not only a heap is there is a ability to be stacked

after your soul is removed then you are not you

Pinocchio says "my nose will now grow". If it grows that means he was telling the truth but it only grows if he's lying. If it doesnt grow that means he lied so why didn't it grow to signify the lie? PARADOX!

Hi Vsauce3 hi I'm Ridln I am a rapper.
Ridln - Never Boring.

Verse 1 -
Never boring forever soaring.
Gone with my capital one credit card.
Dawn until greedy bastards want some.
Bed ridden until one AM Ridln some again
with the debit going gone put them in
for never boring and.

Hook -
Cause my eyes wasn't
Took it took lemon lime soda
Pop my eye popped.
I shut my eye one and once upon a time.
No I got mind and shut up.

Verse 2 -
The never boring dope we bead bunnies
Hopping off the PC screen. While we feds acting
Naturally in all actuallity in the room dedicated to dethicators and deligates. This jump rope growing on me like branches off the tarantula tree.

Verse 3 -
Piles young and running too bad for the tires and tuppy going home Lancashire plad Cutler
Summing fluid stab binary coals and tramps bowling with miniature frames hurling choirs funny. What flaws know I'm never boring just me and I'm Ridln writing something.

Hook -
Cause my eyes wasn't
Took it took lemon lime soda
Pop my eye popped.
I shut my eye one and once upon a time.
No I got mind and shut up.

The study of the gap in time in which someone's soul leaves their physical body.

A heap of atoms. A heap of absolute nothingness, only defined by perspective towards the existence of "nothingness".

Your head is you, replace it and you won't be you.

My hockey team lost in the finals many years ago. I stopped watching hockey for about 12 years and every player was traded or retired. They still the same team? The ship paradox made me think of that.

I adore how the "Credits" in the info panel gives credit to TWO PEOPLE for something called "sound design" but NO MENTION of the classical violin music playing straight through the entire video. Glad I'm not classical composer.

You're really conflating paradoxes with fallacies in our minds, calling them 'logical paradoxes', where we expect someone to say 'logical fallacies', then describing paradoxes.

The boat is a concept we made
The heap is a concept we made
I am my brain
Same exact brain = same exact person
Why should i assume i am not?

It's paradoxical.

The next sentence will be false. The previous sentence was true.

me: mom can we get vsauce?
mom: we already have vsauce at home
vsauce at home:

a heap is when there is more then 1 leyer of sand

So get this thought - if you died and we brought your brain back to life in a bat and it was living just fine then how would you know your alive or dead you have no eyes ears or senses but your alive… that’s something to think about for real….

Catch 22

yes chairs dont exist

This statement is false.

Im sure someone caught the paradox in this video??? Jake mentioned about when you teleport, the machine takes your make up that travels to the location, is that the same person who enter the machine or not? So... since jake "figured" out teleportion... how do we know thats the real jake that we see next in the video or because he was aware of the paradox, figured a different way of thinking and so he knows how to avoid such scenario occurring, he knows for certain he will be the same person so is he the real jake? Every time? Like it tried to argue about the whole is heterlogical is heterlogical or autological but in a video format? Probably just overthinking to be honest... idk I would greatly appreciate your suggestions or ideas or if im nuts lol

Years later - I'm so glad you're healed

Double Double is autological. The same is 2 doubles, making the same, itself, also a double double.

Universe and its functions/rules cannot be described with Vocabulary(Words). If you start describing the universe with words you will land in millions of paradoxes because words describes things to an certain extent only and not the entirety. Man makes rules in general to avoid paradoxes. Say for example if we say more than 5 is many then 1 is 1 , 2 is 2, 3 is 3, 4 is 4, 5 is 5, and 6 is many. It is again applicable to the heap example you have given. The example, what is ME is the logical extent of my YOU is your ME. YOU or ME need not be a physical thing. As long as any consciousness thinks YOU then YOU or ME exists even if it is dead or live.

this channel is the definition of an existential crisis I swear

Hope a fly doesn't land on you just before you teleport 😉

wow my first vsauce3video ever

Another humble, smart man talking about Theseus with sarcoma. I’m very glad that Jake survived… I wonder how he reacted to Techno?

Another thing to consider for the teletransportation paradox is this: What if the data on what you were was transmitted to two separate places, and both places recreated separate versions of you. Which one is the real you? Are they both you? Or are neither you? And things get weirder... Would these characters think independently or as one? They both have the exact same experience up until the teleportation so...
Yeah. Weird.

Hope all is well with you Jake. Always worry and wonder when you stop making new videos.

The Grelling – Nelson paradox is a fraud and transparently so, in my view. It actually makes no sense with regard to the authors’ intent. To make this clear, consider first, the Barber’s paradox of which it is a variation.
By the logic by which it was formulated, which is faulty as that below demonstrates, there are two sets of men, those who shave themselves and those who do not. The latter instead goes to the barber to be shaved. By his sign, he instructs all those in town that he only shaves men who do not shave themselves. The context is that all the men live in a town where the law states that each must be shaved. The paradox then is supposed to arise when considering that the barber cannot shave himself for his sign instructs that he does not shave those who shave themselves, yet he must be shaved but is left with no other option.
The problem in this scheme is clearly seen in that the two sets of men share the identical criteria for membership in their respective sets, that they are men, that they live in town and that they must be shaved. Were these left to be that which defines the set(s), there could only be one set and not two and the paradox would fail. They are by definition then made two distinct sets by the single criterion, peculiar to each which is their relationship to shaving, for the one that they shave themselves and for the other that they do not. “If” that logic by which these two sets of men are defined as such is to be consistent throughout the paradox and the conclusions drawn, the barber must be a member of a third set of men whose separation from the first two sets is demanded by his unique relationship to shaving, i.e., that he shaves others. Deny this and you deny the means by which the first two sets of men can be defined as such and the paradox fails. Accept it and the paradox fails. This is because it is not a paradox.
So too with the Grelling – Nelson paradox. This is nothing more than a cheap rip off of Russell’s Barber paradox above. As is clear in the video, as the topic is presented, the autological adjectives are essentially equivalent to the set of men in the Barber’s paradox who shave themselves while the heterologous adjectives are equivalent to those who are shaved by the barber and the term heterologous is the barber. The same logic governs…if the autologous adjectives are defined as a member of that set precisely because “they describe themselves” and the heterologous adjectives are defined as members of that set precisely because “they don’t describe themselves” then the term heterologous cannot be an adjective of the set of adjectives that don’t describe themselves precisely because it describes other adjectives, its essential function/characteristic. In each case of the first two mentioned sets and of the third I have defined, like in Russell’s barber paradox, each is a member because of a unique characteristic. You can try to deny that this third set exists but in doing so, as in the Barber’s paradox, you deny the means of the first two sets existing and again, you have no paradox. Additionally, the term autological does not describe itself so by what logic is it required that we consider whether heterological is heterological or autological? I don’t see this as at all clever or instructive. Am I missing something?

Size related paradoxes like that always get me. Like when is a rock small enough to be a pebble? Or big enough to be a boulder? Where does the sea become the ocean? An island is a land mass surrounded by water, but every land mass on the planet is surrounded by water.

Wow the thought about how we might know if we the same person every time we wake up after sleep has come to my mind long time ago before watching the video

This is the most enthusiastic anyone has described being bedridden because of cancer therapy

I discovered this channel wayyyyyy too late BUT the good part is that I do have a lot of stuff to watch now :D

So inorder for us to be us, there has to be something outside of us sustaining us.

About heterological, you just mentioned that it is paradoxical. But it isn't. Is 'heterological' heterological? The simple answer would be yes. Is we consider a no, it would mean we're assuming that it is autological. But the truth is that it isn't autological which means that the very assumption that this word is not heterological becomes null and void. Therefore it is heterological. Please correct me if I misunderstood.

Regards.

Hope you are doing fantastic 💚💚

Nice

i want that outro song so bad, anybody know the name?

The ship isn't a different ship until the very last plank is replaced.
A person stops being a person when his brain is replaced.
One is a sentient object one is not. The trees were for the planks but they were killed and dried before they were used for the boat.

what if i write purple with a purple pencil?

Wow, you have cancer, and you're still making video's, very persistant.

Watching this video in 2022

Let's make it a discussion and I'll answer all your questions !!!

that last one really makes blinking feel... different

Is that the violin theme from HxH in the beginning?

r/logicalparadox