Expansion of the Göktürk Empire | The Celestial Turks Episode 2

This video includes more realistic images, and more animated scenes then ever. The style of music, transitions and even the general map have also changed. For the better? Tell me what you think below.

Jai Hinduja. The genes of the Turkic nomads beyond the Great Wall like the Xiongnu, Xianbei, Rouran, Shatou turks, Eastern Gokturks are not lost. They are fused into today Han population.

👍

Videolarınızı çok sevdim, türk olduğunuzu varsayarak Türkçe yazıyorum. Hunlar ve Xiongnuların türk olduğunu söylüyorsunuz diğer videolarınız da fakat bunu kanıtlayabilecek bir kaynağınız var mı? Gördüğüm kadarıyla sadece türk tarihçiler bu iddia da bulunuyor, hiçbir yabancı tarihçiden aynı savı duyamadım. Öğrenmek için soruyorum yoksa beni de gururlandırır bu halkların türk olması.

Test

Devam

Wusunların iraniliği kesin değildir.

O'zbek Turklaridan raxmat 🇺🇿
От 800-900 годы до 1700-1800 годы можно назвать Тюркские эпоха.

Why were they called “celestial”?

As a Chinese, I’ve been fascinated by the intricate relations between China and Turk in the history. What China did to weaken Turks who were a powerful northern neighbour at a time in the Tang dynasty (618~907), was recorded in 500~600 Chinese history, especially in the Sui dynasty (581~618) official history. It would be quite amusing to read details in regard to the success that the Chinese boasted using “divide and rule” among Turks. Ends justify means. The rest is history. It is also extraordinary that the Chinese were so honest in describing such conspiracy and intrigue vividly, because Confucius （551～479 BC）generally disapproved it and the Chinese is likely to use more modest or hypocritical language to write their history. The Master said: “And then, if people who live in far-off land still resist your attraction, you must draw them to you by the moral power of civilization; and then, having attracted them, make them enjoy your peace.”(The Analects of Confucius,16.1, Translation and notes by Simon Leys) “远人不服，则修文德以待之。既来之，则安之。” Turks, warriors on the steppe, suddenly disappeared from the Chinese history just like the Huns. It is said then the Turks were a a small part of Mongolian army as iron-smith. Finally the Turks created an Ottoman Empire in Anatolia in their own. What an amazing story it is! The phoenix is reborn from ashes. Thank you for this excellent document .

Çok güzel anlatıyorsunuz

Völliger unsinn. Die Indoeuropäische abstammung ist nicht wiederlegt! Sie scheinen zu großteilen ostasiaten gewesen zu sein aber auch Indoeuropäische einflüsse sind deutlich zu erkennen und nicht durch zufälle erklärbar. Außerdem hast du vorher, vor dieser studie schon verwucht die Diskussion als falsch ab zutun. Das hat nichts mit Fakten sondern mit wunschdenken zu tun. Nicht gut.

It was the Tila khani (Golden Khanate) of the Afereydun The Ashkan Dara Aka Darius Ashkani . Shna Khani ( Green Khanate) , Tura Khani ( Black Khanate) , Spin Khani ( The Central White Khanate

Merhaba illüstrasyonları nasıl yapıyosunuz acaba

Göktürk devrini anlatan ve gerçekçi tasvir eden etkileyici bir video.Tebrik ederim!

Can I ask one question?Why Gokturks invasions was so unsuccessful than mongol empire's invasions?In spite of the army of both empires contained from turkic people?

This is a great presentation that helped clarify the events and timeline.

this channel is just awesome

Thanks!

significance of this history represents it self even in literature of modern republic of Türkiye today ; - for fresh fruits and veggies we tend to relate it to Turfan

The Magyar are turks now too ! : )

Interesting information about the historical relations between Korea and the Turks.
It is said that history sometimes repeats itself.
The Shahnameh epic mentions the causes of the war that took place between Ashina and the Hephthalites.
Istemi Yabgu, whose center of rule is located in the Chach region, sent an embassy to the Sassanid Empire, and while it was passing through the lands of the Hephthalites, it was plundered and its ambassadors were killed. Therefore, Istemi Yabgu decided to take revenge on the Hephthalites and defeated them in a decisive battle. After the battle, Khosrau Anushirvan decided to build intermarriage relations with Gokturk.
This story is very similar to the scenario of the war that took place between the Chinggisid Empire and the Khwarezmian Empire.
Prince Al-Khorezmi robbed the caravan and killed the Mongol merchants, so Genghis Khan decided to take revenge on the Khwarazramshah state.
There are some notes on the second part:
First: Indo-European is only a linguistic family and not a specific race.
Second: The Chinese study on Princess Ashina is a politicized study in its results and has political goals beyond that targeting the Turkic peoples in general and the Uyghur people in particular.
It is no secret to many that the Chinese republican system is a highly centralized system that interferes in many details and imposes many restrictions on freedoms of thought and expression. On top of that, there is a long historical national/political conflict over the East Turkestan region, and therefore the results of the study cannot be separated from this explicit context.
Of course, I am only addressing the results of this study and not the mechanism used in analyzing the body of Princess Ashina, which was previously assumed to be correct.
Third: The study stated in its results “refutation of Western Eurasian origin and multiple origin hypotheses,” and here the fallacy of incorrect generalization was committed.
Can this result be generalized to some ancient Turkic peoples, such as: Kyrgyz-Yenisei, Cumans, Pechenegs, and others?
Fourth: This Chinese study also stated among its results, “The limited contribution of ancient Gokturks present in the modern Turkish-speaking population confirms once again the validity of the cultural diffusion model over the semi-diffusion model of the spread of Turkic languages.”
This statement is intended to refute the occurrence of migrations of Turkish tribes during the Middle Ages to the Middle East, Eastern Europe, and other regions in Eurasia.
Anyone with a basic knowledge of political analysis understands the political dimensions of the context of that Chinese research.
The migration of Turkish peoples to Anatolia in the Middle Ages is conclusively proven historically and scientifically.
Byzantine, Latin, Arabic, and Persian sources mentioned massive Turkmen migrations to the Middle East during the Seljuk era.
In Anatolia, for example, it was mentioned that one of the results of the victory of the Battle of Manzikert was the occurrence of huge Turkic migrations in numbers of millions to Anatolia.
Where Ibn Saeed Al-Maghribi mentioned the number of Turkmen in Anatolia, he said that there were 200,000 Turkmen yurts in Antalya and its surrounding areas, 30,000 yurts in Ankara and its surrounding areas, and about 100,000 yurts in Kastamonu and its surrounding areas.
It is unfortunate that the Chinese researchers in this study are ignorant of these obvious historical details.
The ancient historians of the Middle Ages, for example, when they dealt with Anatolia and the Mamluk state in Egypt, were aware of these essential details.
They described the Seljuk state of Rum and the Turkish emirates in Anatolia as Turkish states, and they also described Anatolia as Turkestan because of the large Turkish presence in this geographical region, while in Egypt they described the Mamluk state as the Turkish state and did not describe Egypt as Turkestan because there was no large Turkish migration to Egypt.
Fifth: This study did not address what was mentioned in Chinese sources about the external characteristics of Khaqan Muqan, and works to provide a new interpretation of the ancient Chinese text that is radically different from what is common and solves the problem of contradiction.
Falling into the fallacy of an artificial impasse causes the researcher to adopt results full of errors and fallacies.
The fact that the Turkic peoples have been ethnically mixed since ancient times is self-evident information supported by historical context, contemporary reality, and scientific research.
Objective researchers deal with general Turkic history in that it is the result of more than two thousand years and is not limited to a specific historical moment.
The debate about ethnic origin is a fruitless debate at the present time because it revolves around an unresolved historical dilemma that has been subject to an ideological agenda and racial conflict, despite the fact that mixing between races and cultures is a positive force.
If the ethnicity is A or B, what problem will result from this? Nothing at all.
We are children of the present time and are not prisoners of what happened in the Middle Ages and the Bronze and Iron Ages and the like.
Identity is a complex structure that is subject to interactions between many different factors and long-term historical accumulations.

The judgment of the jackals is until the wolf stands up! 🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷

In Azerbaijani Turkish, we use the word “toy” for the wedding party and historically we used Qurultay” for conferences or decision-making gatherings, like the one arranged for Nadir Shah in Mughan.

Bu güzel video ve açıklayıcı anlatımı için teşekkür ederim Khan's Den. Etrüsk'lerin Türkler ile bir alakadarlığı var mı bunu merak ediyorum. Çünkü birkaç yerde İtalya da bulunan Etrüsk eserlerinde yazan yazıların eski Gök Türkçe ile tercüme edilebildiğini okudum. Bu konuda bir bilginiz varsa videosunun gelmesi hoş olurdu. ❤

Nice, Thanks mate👍

Oguzlarin buyuk kaganlarindan BAYINDIR Han isareti kullaniyorsun

Donec totum impleat orbem

Regards from Kazakhstan 🇰🇿, excellent job

Horse crap that Ashina princess had eastern dna. They are conducting genocide of Turkic people in eastern turkestan that’s why they are falsifying dna samples. Tiele people in Altay R1a z93 haplogroup 55% just like Osman Sultan of Othoman empire

🤍

Adamsin! devam yavuz abi ! 🤘🤘🐺🐺🇹🇷🇹🇷 ogrensinler soyle yavas yavas kim oldugumuzu !

Sehr gut!!!

In Uyghur, we say Kurultay for the mass meeting. And when you look at the inner cities of Kog (blue) turks empire, those cities still exist in Eastern Turkistan... modern day Uyghurs. My parents and relatives from Kashgar, Turfan and Atush

It was an informative and wonderful historical coverage episode about Turkik empires ,Turkik tribes consisting, and their's campaigns of l Northern Central of Asia. Thank you for an excellent ( Khan Den) channel for sharing this wonderful episode

I've been excited for this to come out, thank you! Just curious if you have ever tried to debunk the "tartaria" scam? Every time I hear it, I just cringe thinking of the actual history they delete by choice. Great work!

I am sure this channel will grow constantly. Keep the quality work up. Best from Germany!

The descendants of Shem established Islam, and the descendants of Japheth established Christianity. The Mongols were direct descendants of Nimrod, the descendant of Ham. He was a tyrant and hunter who did not establish any religion. Instead, he tended to become a rebel. India and East Asia were Nimrod. Founded by the descendants of Nimrod, the mainstream of the world can also be divided into three parts. Christianity and Islam joined forces to destroy Nimrod, and the descendants of Esau near Central Asia who acted as warriors attacked China and India respectively. Both China and India were defeated by them. Occupation, leaving a large number of Muslims in these countries, Christian countries also attacked them, and also left many Christians. Erdogan’s accent is very similar to Koreans. There are many Christians in South Korea today, and Christianity has little effect on South Korea. , because Koreans are more suitable to be Muslims. Koreans are descendants of Shem after all.

Did the Gokturk conquer the Magyars (Ongunurs)?

Wow, excellent work. So is the Gokturk civil war next?

Excellent work. Remarkable progress. Best in the field. ( Except those minarets🤫)

Yine çok iyi , İstanbul'un Doğurama periodun da Ayasofyanın minarelerini görmek hoşuma gitti. Hep benzer "hataları" onlar mı yapacaklar ? :)))

Very interesting and informative to say the least! Love your consistent research and dedication to unraveling the true nature of these incredible people and their culture/society. 😊 thank you for your work! Hail!

Nice, first one! Love and blessings! Esenlikler!