Комментарии:
After years of being criticized and being made fun of, they finally let out all of that aggression 😂 definitely the most fun I had writing one of these scripts
Ответить1st edition ranger after getting hit by "beez nuts": Ligma BEEalls
Ответить1e wizard: goblin sticked me, i died
5e wizard: hah, it took2 goblins to stick kill me
1e figher: bonking?
5e fighter: yes
Gloomstalker: Am I a joke to you?
Ответить4e ranger: ....you both suck.
ОтветитьWith 1e you rolled your stats then decided what you could be the numbers you got. If you got the numbers to be a ranger you were a total bad ass.
Ответить"I did have a f*ck about that statement, but sadly I gave it to a worthy cause." LITERAL. FIRE.
ОтветитьGloomstalker is one of the best subclass in the game , change my mind
ОтветитьI liked playing a ranger in 3.5
Ответить1st E wins by a landslide
ОтветитьStill waiting for Barbarians turn…
ОтветитьI like the mic drop.
ОтветитьI definitely chuckled, though I feel the need to ask, mostly out of puzzlement - Ranger hasn’t been bad since Tasha’s, why do so many people still dunk on it?
ОтветитьI want to see barbarian so bad
ОтветитьHey is there a Bard and Artificer video from when they were first created vs 5th edition
ОтветитьMy character is a mushroom man who is the tavern owner. His backstory is that his tavern is destroyed by bandits and he joins the party to get his revenge.
ОтветитьDon't forget drakemwarden
ОтветитьNever played 1e AD&D, but played 2e: you don't have it quite right with giving the treasure away. As it was explained in 2e (the change away from this system wasn't made until 3.x), it's not "giving it away to a worthy cause" that's the paladin. It's more of the fact that they were actually supposed to be wilderness protectors vs true adventurers. So they didn't need much treasure and would often give away more than a few gold, kept on hand in case of emergencies. They also usually wouldn't ENCOUNTER that much gold to begin with, prior to adventuring. Rangers were free to drop it in the middle of the street if they wished to.
Ответить"I did have a f*ck about that statement but I gave it to a worthy cause" is an amazing line
Ответитьbees and gloomstalker
ОтветитьPlease I am begging you to do bards next. I will cast suggestion.
ОтветитьI think that the Sorcerer should be next.
ОтветитьPlease do barbarians next. That would be hilarious
Ответить5e ranger with the bees
Ответитьidk, ranger's whirlwind is kinda fun if you multiclass barbarian and fighter as well
ОтветитьDrakewarden.
That's a boss one.
Halfling Ranger, Drake mount, mounted feat.
Literally HTTYD.
5e rangers are actually good though
ОтветитьWhen will we have 1E vs 5E barbarians vs Ad-barian
Will they actually really fight ?
But Amazing video btw
1st edition won
ОтветитьIve only play 5th edition d&d world of darkness I think the Genesis system whatever the official star wars table top used an the system for the fallout tabletop game
So I have no clue how 1st or any other edition works
I would Say: a fucking dragon
ОтветитьNot gonna lie I do I unironically play the ranger class….still love it
Ответитьi think 5e won
ОтветитьYesterday i joined a new campain. There is 10 players. So big group is something new to me but i am willing to try. Anyway we are missing one class. Try to guess which one 😏.
ОтветитьMonk
ОтветитьActually, rangers nowadays are pretty good. They honestly have access to some of the best spells in the game (no, hunter's mark's not one of them, though it is pretty good) and fighting capabilities sometimes even comparable to fighters
ОтветитьMeanwhile, I'm just sitting back cackling at this with my 4e Ranger, who is a freaking murder buzz-saw from level 1, and can just choose to deal extra damage during their attack once per round to whatever enemy you've designated your Hunter's Quarry in that turn, no having to select a favored type of enemy from the start of the game. Who says there's never been a Ranger who didn't need an entire overhaul right after publishing to make them effective?
ОтветитьI dunno Drake Wardens are pretty cool, and I do like some of the hunter features
Ответитьthe only good ranger is the truly Superior 3.5 ranger
ОтветитьYou gonna do for every class?
ОтветитьUm drake warden
ОтветитьI CHOKED ON THAT LAST JOKE IT WAS SO STUPID BUT I LOVED IT
Ответитьranger won.
ОтветитьDwarf
ОтветитьEveryone: haha ranger sucks lol
Ranger: How far away is it? oh, 500 yards? Yeah no problem. fires single arrow It's dead now. WHO'S UP FOR SOME ANIMAL HANDLING?
I think 5th edition wins on a technicality
Ответить5th edition ranger: I have a pet dragon
1st edition ranger: wait what your kidding it has to be small at best
.
5th edition ranger: come here boy
1st edition ranger: why is it that big? Also that is awesome!
1st Edition Ranger getting per-level damage bonuses against a rather generous list of "Giant Class" monsters, and some potentially awesome followers at level 10. =^[.]^=
Ответить