Комментарии:
that iden deck looks miserable to play against
ОтветитьIf Jordan forced Garrett to attack in game 3, that was completely lame. He needs to keep his board state clear, so it must be clear he has a sentinel...put a token on your guy so the opponent knows something is up. Just hate it when players are greedy for wins like that.
ОтветитьLame that Jordan forced the Sabine attack onto childsen
ОтветитьEverybody is talking bad about jordan, but it is both player's responsibility to read each card and know what cards do, especially at that stage of competitive play.
ОтветитьI think it was a huge misplay to defeat Entrenched.
One cargo ship had 1 damage on it, Sabine + Entrenched kills it, and saves 4/8/12 damage later. If Sabine's going to die anyways, might as well be on his own terms.
I'm in agreement with the judge. Garret proved he knew what Childsen did in game 2 when he used aggression to clear him out. Part of competitive play is keeping in mind the state of the board before you make any decisions. Especially in a back and forth game like SWU. The same rule applies in chess. Once you make a move and take your hand off the piece declaring it, you can't take it back even if you see the checkmate right afterwards. That's the difference between a casual and competitive event.
ОтветитьAwesome video as always. Excellent job on the commentating. Very professional. Keep it up 👏🙂.
ОтветитьSuperlaser blast. I didn't realise you can resolve each unit's defeat individually in a specific order so that Iden's ability can still trigger. Does anyone have a rule reference for that play?
ОтветитьGreat video, this makes me want to check the game out. But I do have to say, man, it got old being reminded over and over and over that this event was at SCG con Richmond and was a 4k. its on the screen, in the video name. we dont need it reiterated every two minutes in a 51 minute long video
ОтветитьTotal bs that he was forced to attack Childsen. Very poor sportsmanship
Ответитьrespectfully, you never willingly discard For a Cause
ОтветитьThanks for covering this!
ОтветитьSeeing that they already split the winnings, the actions made by Jordan are very scummy... Hope 1st place was worth it.
ОтветитьGreat content as usuall.
ОтветитьSkummy players in blue, always.
ОтветитьIt seems like game designers always give control a leg up at the beginnings of their game's life. It's too bad because it is fun to see a board smack into each other rather than wipes, card advantage, etc. of good old blue that always seems to be a side to say: No fun for you!
ОтветитьRules need to be followed. If you let one person take something back, then you should let everyone. Then the slope gets steep very quickly. Plus, it is a big stakes tournament with serious players. Part of being a serious player is knowing and remembering board states, triggers, etc.
Thanks for the coverage!
It's wild to me how many people are legitimately having issue with an official rule being enforced by a judge at a COMPETITIVE TOURNAMENT
ОтветитьI just wanted to clarify again for everyone that there was no Top 8 (quarter-finals) coverage. The Top 8 decided to split the cash prizes, and only four players from the Top 8 wanted to stay and play for the trophy. Thanks again to everyone for all the support!
Ответить