Комментарии:
Dyson Sphere/Swarm is the way to go.
ОтветитьGuys this ear 2023 a nuclear fission engine made more energy than was put in, so it is possible.
ОтветитьJapan has Tritium. Do store the tritium from them and use it for fusion power. Fine tune, the design using AI, ML to increase the energy output like a combined design of laser and magnetic confinement.Interconnect the electrical grids of close nations together and sell power to other nations where not enough is generated. African nations should be able to do it first using solar energy. Fusion energy projects should be used in India. China is already on fusion project. Fusion has a lot of potential to reduce all types of pollution and enable greener transportation.
ОтветитьJust 10 billion dollars?! The US spends more on its army every year!
ОтветитьChina took notes from the “can we make a sun” part
ОтветитьLunar Light Energy
ОтветитьNo amount of energy and resources can satisfy Human greeds. We need to limit ourselves. I don't think sponsor of research and development are interested in well-being and humanity. Their interests are business /money only. When aims and objectives are business. Well being of society are by chance or byproduct never desired.
ОтветитьYeah sun on earth , more like Hell on earth .
ОтветитьThe Dragon Ball Z and other anime references thrown into these videos is a real turn off. :-/
This is about science, not fiction.
Effin scientists!!! Redirect power from hydroelectric power to power the laser to start compression on a super cold mass of hydrogen. It's a start. Or creat a electromagnetic accretion disc by using super electrified mercury in a gyroscopic centrifuge. Just thinking .
ОтветитьTo everyone thinking that scientists achieved a net energy gain with fusion: NO, THEY DIDN'T. If you are referring to the laser-stuff: they got 3 MJ of fusion energy out of 2 MJ of laser energy, BUT they needed 300 MJ to set up the laser and other systems, so no gain there.
ОтветитьExcellent overview! The problem is energy transfer. We don’t currently have an efficient way to extract energy from a nuclear reaction. Even fission based reactors rely on heat transfer to power steam turbines, to then generate electricity at a huge loss of power from that being released from the reactor itself, and with fusion it takes more energy to start the reaction and maintain it than what we can extract from it on the output. So it’s a net loss of power until someone comes up with a much better method for converting a nuclear reaction into usable electric power.
Ответить❤❤
ОтветитьI love the occasional anime references that causally pop up from time to time in Kurzgesagt videos.
ОтветитьSounds like fun to me and maybe we can learn some other things along the way
ОтветитьPrepare or Die
ОтветитьIn 5,000,000,000 years the sun will die
ОтветитьКлевый ролик
Ответитьgood news, now the fusion that gives more energy than used is possible
ОтветитьHalf future, half failure
ОтветитьThe math for fusion doesn't add up The field containing the energy is stronger than the energy that's contained
ОтветитьI just watched a video on the reactor that melted down in Japan.
They spew out tritium from not only their reactor but all nuclear. Fission reactors make tridium water.
Why don't we just use that?
WE NEED AN UPDATE FOR THIS. US-NIF ALREADY MADE MORE ENERGY THAN D AND T CONSUMED!
ОтветитьI Say Cut Our Losses !
Ответитьfusion can make lasers. lasers is in a certain a lot. you know what that game is? just shapes and beats inserted
ОтветитьI dont like the concept of commercial anything on the moon, let alone a mine. I feel like thats just using modern technology to move backwards. A source of energy lasting thousands of years relying on a mine isn't the solution, that's how we sustain fission.
Ответить1986?
Ответитьcan you update this video like.. tomorrow?
ОтветитьThan how's it better than fission, if it takes more energy to make fusion than they get out of it? They say it's like thousands times more energy dense than fission ,but they can't even get it running... doesn't make sense.
ОтветитьWe must mine the moon NOW
Ответитьlol is that the Titanic song lol?
ОтветитьMoving and shedding and vibrating electrons… magnetic topics
ОтветитьThe energy of plasma… fascinating.
ОтветитьThis video made me realize how scientifically consistent Doc Ock was in Spider-Man 2
ОтветитьSay that you lived on the dark side of the moon. Your solar and gamma ray radiation would be at its minimum. You lived in a controlled environment with optimal O2 levels, sufficient diet and sleep.. Imagine how much longer a human could live.
ОтветитьI don't think oil companies would ever let this happen
Ответить"There are not enough batteries to store sunlight for cloudy days yet."
Dawg, just make a solar tower that goes above the clouds.
I have a question. Could a dual fusion-fission reactor be viable? Just curious
ОтветитьEvery fusion vs 👉plastic 👉ex🌏eco?
ОтветитьSeeing goku in a video on this channel is goated😂😂😂
ОтветитьVideo about superconductors.
Ответить10 billion dollars spend to builds those kinds of useful energy resources isn't a lot compared to what countries like america spends on things like military and author things that's don't really matters for humans on the long terms so i thing that's this will be a good next step for humanity to improve it's technology
Ответитьpiccolo and goku fusion hahahaha
ОтветитьSo it's just Fire 2
ОтветитьNuclear fission it's still a good choice tho. It produces a LOT of clean, low cost energy and the "nuclear waste" it's very little and almost completely recyclable. It's also very safe, reactors can handle earthquakes and tsunamis, and so are the cask containing waste, just look on yt all the test they put it through: trains, missiles, fire.
ОтветитьComing here in 2023 after watching Oppenheimer 🙌
Ответить