Комментарии:
It’s not sustainable … I get it!
Thank you ❤
No answer to question lol
ОтветитьGreed is the source of all problems on Earth
ОтветитьLots of foods, decent moderately population
Ответить"Trees don't grow to the sky" - German Proverb
ОтветитьThank you for sharing
ОтветитьIt's the mammoth criminal corporations/governments who perpetuate the plunder of the earth and create strife in order to keep GDP growth. Many of the people involved attend the yearly meeting of the mega rich in that well known quaint little Swiss town and other meetings throughout the year to discuss their "philanthropic" plans for the rest of humanity, like decreasing carbon...oh right...that plan is going quite well at the moment..👎
Ответить“Partnered with the World Economic Forum”
Tells me all I need to know about TED
Here's the thing, in a truly free market society, you can grow at the rate that you can and want, and central planning always fails.
Ответить"This lesson was made in partnership with WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM" 💀💀
ОтветитьIt's easy for people that come from developed countries to judge how certain civilization must use their natural resources
But for the most of the country that not yet developed , it's their only chance to be developed to keep up with other nations to be developed one...but unfortunately for them when they try to develop their country people that never know their struggle and suffering.lecture them tomstopmehat they're doing because they damaging the nature, they get sanctions, they get embargo, they get isolated from international community
Then they think everyone want to annihilated them so they go into defense mode try to protect their freedom amd sovereignty with anything they can
The Bagel effect
ОтветитьWord games, fear tactics, and buzz words designed to convince you to give power to central planners.
There’s a reason the video ended with the World Economic Forum logo, the people with the “you will own nothing and be happy” sales pitch.
ECOSOCIALISM IS THE WAY? NICE JOKE
ОтветитьThanks for the editorial. This video is useless
ОтветитьSi hubieran más profesionales así, sería muy bueno formar una política real entre todes
ОтветитьHappily Sponsored by the WEF 😁
ОтветитьThe first step we need to take is to acknowledge that the economy is not only bad, but in such a state that it needs to either be completely overhauled or replaced. This means figuring out the issues and then eradicating said issues. We must then focus on moving away from profits and instead move back to making sure everyone can thrive under it, because at the end of the day, the economy is only successful when the people can thrive in it and not how high the profits are.
ОтветитьParadise or heaven have an extreme high and almost infinite high real gdp per capita which means higher real gdp per capita means that our world tend to be a paradise
ОтветитьFinite resources will eventually run out it doesnt matter if it run out in 2050 or 2100 or 2200 we shouldnt think of futur generation because we cant there is no meaning in saving generation 2100 and after that all generations gonna suffer , for me its like someone sleeping and whem his mother wake him up for school and he says to her please let me sleep only 3 minutes same happens here we trying to save 1 generation and thousands of other generations will suffer
ОтветитьSorry to be negative. But this is not a plan at all, because no solution is given. You can't just stop the capitalist system. Then you have to replace it with a well thought-out system. The economy already needs to grow at an average of 3% per year to remain healthy. If we just let the economy shrink, everything will collapse. We now have to work really hard to adjust the system or introduce a completely different system. Unfortunately, left and right would rather quarrel than come to a solution.
Ответитьgrowth still is exponential but resource consumption isnt, so why stop growth?
ОтветитьRidiculous analogy...the growth of a cancer....!!!
ОтветитьDeveloped countries produce more CO₂ emissions than developing ones while actually they should be producing more and the developed ones should be producing such a negligible amount that it limits to zero. The current condtion pf earth has been done by the developments done by the currently developed countries in the previous centuries. They are to blame (and yes, climate change is a blame game and should be). Obviously every other country would want to be developed and it will take the same amount of destruction of the planet that the developed countries did to develop themselves. Is there anything even minutely wrong in that? Infact all expectations to preserve the nature should be solely (only) done with the developed countries ONLY. However the developed countries harm the nature more than the developing ones even today (after being developed still). The video gives the wrong answer to the right question.
Ответить{ وَلَقَدۡ مَكَّنَّٰكُمۡ فِي ٱلۡأَرۡضِ وَجَعَلۡنَا لَكُمۡ فِيهَا مَعَٰيِشَۗ قَلِيلٗا مَّا تَشۡكُرُونَ }
[Surah Al-Aʿrāf: 10]
Dr. Mustafa Khattab:
We have indeed established you on earth and provided you with a means of livelihood. ˹Yet˺ you seldom give any thanks.
Human = cancer, pest, invasive species to planet Earth
ОтветитьAhhhh...the wef cares so much for our collective well being...🤔
ОтветитьMy mom and I make huge profit on our investment with Mrs KATHERNANN her set skills are amazing
ОтветитьYou will never achieve equilibrium under capitalism as it incentivizes growth at any cost, less your competition out perform you.
Ответить❤ thanks i learned a lot
Ответить🙋🏻♂️ I’ll do the honours: @LizTruss @ConservstivesUK
ОтветитьI think you're clearly excluding world superpowers. There were countries that stood economically dominant for centuries.
This is how most economies go. But for the largest and best at any given time growth is absolutely key.
Growth transfers from one place to another. Right now it's shifting to China because of US domestic policies. That needs to change ASAP.
Will the capitalist aristocracy that has a vice grip on the world ever allow this drastic change to happen? In this new economy, not only would endless growth no longer be the goal, endless profits and power wouldnt. Ultimately taking massive amounts of power away from those who control our world currently. I'm not sure we can do it without force.
Ответитьthis video did not answer the question. Spend more time talking about climate and ecological degradation. disappointed.
ОтветитьI deeply disagree with her conclusion. Humanity is nowhere near the limit of our potential. Our quest for progress and the betterment of our species SHOULD be eternal. The minute we stop because some people decide "this is good enough", we condemn our future.
Ответить🧚🏻♂️☯️💒🗽🌏🦉🌌🦅
ОтветитьNot to diminish this brilliant author's work, but what she preaches is actually something that used to be common sense. If we look into the history of human thoughts, we can see different versions of this wisdom across many cultures. It only seem to be novel because what we call Economics today, is but a thinly veiled, sophisticated elaboration of colonialism.
ОтветитьSo how do we implement that into the stock market? Should stable companies be more rewarded?
ОтветитьWe need a mr beast elon musk podcast
ОтветитьWhy, when she put the flower behind her ear did she turn into Glenn Quagmire?
ОтветитьIt’s incorrect to think that economic growth means using more, which is not always the case.
Economic growth also means using our resources more efficiently
We need economic growth and innovation to create technologies like direct air capture to reduce our carbon footprint
Economic growth and ecological preservation are not mutually exclusive
Economic growth includes using less resources to achieve more
I.e. getting more value in the same amount of resources
It's almost like the idea that all things should be profitable is too short term focused to be efficient, safe, or stable in the long run
ОтветитьYes, doughnut economics is glocal
ОтветитьSuch a system can also be created by applying decentralised democracy and green cryptocurrencies
ОтветитьWhy do I love watching something of that kind
ОтветитьKind of an elaboration of the question rather than a real tangible answer.
ОтветитьWEF sellouts
Ответить