Комментарии:
Invictus looks fantastic
Ответить👍
ОтветитьThree more Tank Head one missile two machine power gun
ОтветитьBig frame this one small frame one or Two passangers three no
ОтветитьConcern no coaxial
Ответитьcf
ОтветитьIndia & US Joint Partnership Sikorsky SB 1 Defiant Vertical Lift Helicopter & BEL 360 Invictus Helicopter Development
ОтветитьI really wish we could get people that would really do more research on the various platforms they are showing. Or maybe learn better english!
ОтветитьJOHN, I'M TRYING TO GET A BUS OUT OF REDONDO BEACH, I'LL BE THEIR WHEN I GET THERE,
OK, ETC
utter and complete BS....
ОтветитьThe VH-92 is based on the early EH-101 ending in the final production model AW-101 supercopter that's the best in its class.
ОтветитьRussia has not been a competitor for over 2 decades or more. Only the DoD wants us to Believe that Russia is a world power.
Ответитьthese are not upcoming US military helicopters. Some are prototypes and some will be eliminated in the selection process.
ОтветитьThey’re all going to be in production ?
ОтветитьInvictus looks sexy
ОтветитьRaider all the way
ОтветитьThe bell defiant looks great, the valor that some are mentioning.yea I don't think so not that great.
Ответитьlong range and high speeds... the lack of range of helicopters is actually the main reason why the V22 exists. operation eagle claw.
ОтветитьNeeds Gatling guns both sides with the Gatling gun and operater front of the soldiers your taking to battlefield you want as much consented fire at multiple targets with accurate weapons systems that can engage anything on the ground while you're coming in
ОтветитьYou people need to wake up and realize there is another principle player in the next major helicopter program and that is the V-280 Valor. What you need to do is realize that if the V-280 is finalized as the winner your videos will be totally Junk for ignoring a candidate. The V-280 can be thought of as the successor to the V-22 osprey as well as its design solves many of the issues. It wont replace the V-22 but future system designs may use it instead of the V-22. I will admit you have disclosed more helicopter variations than I was aware of. Just note that some sources have reported that the V-280 has already won and the competition is crying fowl.
ОтветитьLOL!!! This aged well!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣
ОтветитьDONT GET ME WRONG - ALL OF THE HELOS HERE ARE AWESOME - I came here to review all the Future Vertical Lift entries after being initially disappointed that Bell's V280 Valor beat out the Sikorsky Defiant X , I have a strong preference for Coaxial Rotors, and although Tilt-Rotors are cool , and very futuristic, it's hard for many to move past the many horrific incidents the Osprey suffered. Like someone else mentioned here, the DoD likes to keep many of the big players in business and will often spread contracts out even if they aren't technically the best design in order to keep the factories flowing and competition healthy. Here's the bottom line ; I think the V-280 valor is a better replacement for the UH-60 BlackHawk, I think it's a great troop and cargo transporter, can get troops quickly in and safely IN & OUT of the fight. I think the Raider X is a better option for the attack helicopter. The invictus has a few problems I don't like, first of all I HATE ASYMMETRICAL Designs ( The traditional Single rotor and Tail rotor for Anti-Torque ) The tail rotor is THE ACHILLES HEEL of many traditional heli designs, they are easily destroyed even by small arms fire, and even a nick in the tail rotor induces unctrollable torque + certain DEATH. The coaxial Rotor is one of the greatest inventions ever, the Ka-50 Blackshark can have it's entire Tail boom blown off and still get home safely. The invictus is small and stealthy, which is good in some situations, but I think the Raider X can carry MORE weapons, has the option of small crew or cargo transport which the invictus does not, and has greater speed and maneuverability. I think for most situations the Raider X is the superior design for ATTACK platforms. I hope it wins , and It will be AMAZING to hopefully see both the V280 and the Raider X in the field , and maybe even War movies.
ОтветитьAmazing work I wanna goin your amazing company
ОтветитьThe AVX looks like a Star Wars: Attack Of The Clones ship.
ОтветитьSeveral of these designs are taking from the AH-56 Cheyenne of 67.
ОтветитьThe first helicopter I'm so interested in oh it gets away with not having any rear propeller?? In the past the only way to do this is to have twin propellers on the top spinning opposite directions.
ОтветитьTanks and helicopters are obsolete
ОтветитьThe SB1 Defiant lost out to the Bell 280 Valor.
And you're using very outdated renderings for the Bell 360 Invictus. Bell eliminated the ducted tail rotor a couple of years ago.
Can't wait to fly them in future Battlefield Multiplayer games
ОтветитьDecember 2022: Coming in like a wrecking ball The Bell v 280 valor, chosen by US Army
ОтветитьWhy do you know all of this I feel this should be classified information
Ответить❤️🇺🇸❤️
ОтветитьWhat about the V-280 Valor?
Ответитьthe speed hawk why not just i don’t build a plane, that thing is basically a plane anyway, also iam not sure i would want be flying into enemy territory with the giant hulking engine at the back, it is huge snd would make a pretty easy target.
Ответитьv 280 valor is missing which is the actually only proven helicopter
ОтветитьMaka nya gak konsentrasi aku army god
ОтветитьThe MD969 looks like a "Little Bird" replacement. The Sikorsky RAIDER/DEFIANT series are the best Blackhawk replacement designs.
The BELL 360 is new innies airframe and old in its power and lift technology. Get the AVX attack chopper instead!
These are not upcoming. The X-49 was built and discarded years ago
Ответитьwhat do need for those fast helos when they already have the ospreys
Ответить💜💚🇺🇸
ОтветитьProposals
ОтветитьAlien technology dude,,
ОтветитьInfantry's best friend, helicopters are the basis of a strong advancing conquering special forces.
ОтветитьThe design of defiant x and Sikorsky s-97 raider are the same
ОтветитьYour comments of the VH-92A are not accurate and are taken out of context. Damaging landing zones 😂 It lands on the White House front lawn and it puts out 3000 SHP
ОтветитьLaser = cannon, chaff, and flare + extra silhouette missile counter. Why do I see a cannon????? Use a laser. It’s clearly the future. USA needs more common sense.
ОтветитьSikorsky has the S-97 Raider compete with the Bell+Textron 360 Invictus in the AAS / FARA (armed scout) program.
Meanwhile, the Sikorsky+Boeing SB-1 Defiant competes with the Bell+Lockheed V280 Valor for the FVL (long-range lift) program.
Given how the US defense industry works, it is likely that both companies get one contract each, to keep every factory running, everybody employed.
So if you like both Sikorsky or both Bell designs, get ready for a disappointment.
The Raider has troop capacity while the Invictus does not, but that gives the Invictus better stealth properties, just like the Boeing-Sikorsky RAH-66 Comanche had. Not sure why they abandoned that design. Just to push a common scout and transport design when they know it's not very likely they'll get both contracts?
The V280 seems to be the more mature design, faster and longer range. But the SB-1 might offer better handling and safety, as it is not a tilt rotor. And it's smaller, closer to the Blackhawk size. This might really go both ways.
It's quick and nimble when it needs to be!
It can fly through the air,
And crash into trees!
Great power competitor? Russia? Really, do you see the news and how back russian technoly may be because of the war and components santions (mainly chips), plus with a crashed economy which not allow them to get even with big players in the next decades or even ever? And have you seen how the "competitor" hardware is brutally failling in Ukraine's war, in many cases superseded by western hardware and technology? Everythin for a buck, everything for a like...
ОтветитьNo more Indian tribe helicopters.
Ответить