A New History for Humanity – The Human Era

A New History for Humanity – The Human Era

Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell

7 лет назад

9,860,844 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

Henderson
Henderson - 18.09.2023 18:49

No bro, this is just globalist people trying to end the influence of Jesus Christ in our modern world. Down with neo satanism

Ответить
yotobiano a caso
yotobiano a caso - 15.09.2023 14:47

Can we visit this site today? Where is it?

Ответить
Grace Neilitz
Grace Neilitz - 15.09.2023 01:31

This is trying to fix a problem that doesn’t really exist. Just keep the calendar that we use today, because it not hurting anyone and we are all used to it.

Ответить
Arthur Martin
Arthur Martin - 14.09.2023 23:04

Wonder when humanity is going to start splitting into different species. Planetary travel will only make that easier.

Ответить
Jack
Jack - 30.08.2023 03:09

😐😑😐😑😐😑😐😑😐😑😐

Ответить
The Badge Facilitator
The Badge Facilitator - 27.08.2023 03:31

Happy 12,023

Ответить
JR D
JR D - 23.08.2023 01:57

12,023

Ответить
dukes
dukes - 20.08.2023 23:31

12023🎉

Ответить
anony mous
anony mous - 19.08.2023 05:18

Or we could just say "10,000 BCE to describe this city start time instead of "year zero".

Ответить
James Barton
James Barton - 16.08.2023 01:38

considering what the yr2k did to our computer systems, we made the first start on that decades before 01/01/2000. I can't wait to see the absolute mess this would make.

Ответить
Rhoelsky18
Rhoelsky18 - 30.07.2023 13:45

I didn’t not expect a science channel to ever give me a history lesson

Ответить
Eamon Ahern
Eamon Ahern - 27.07.2023 14:00

Hello from the year 12023

Ответить
Gianfranco D'Esposito
Gianfranco D'Esposito - 25.07.2023 17:07

Welcome to 12.023

Ответить
rowen baltazar
rowen baltazar - 17.07.2023 16:21

This time reckoning, assuming the starting point of zero at 10,000 BCE, must be near on, or about, the Younger Dryas event.

Thanks for reading.

Ответить
Matouš Beneš
Matouš Beneš - 16.07.2023 23:28

wooow amazing

Ответить
NikandCats
NikandCats - 12.07.2023 05:01

Anyone here in 12,023?

Ответить
Rob Andrews
Rob Andrews - 08.07.2023 20:17

Happy 12,023. That when I'm posting from.❤❤❤
After 40 some years, the U.S. is finally going metric. That's been hard, but it finally happened. And English is the main language used in world communication.

I don't know how this will go over. Could have problems!!

There may be a problem with computers understanding the extra number '1', on every date. Remember the 'y2k', thing 22-years-ago. But I think it's awesome.

Ответить
Gaming with Ron
Gaming with Ron - 07.07.2023 12:15

Someone in 12,023??

Ответить
Steven C.
Steven C. - 07.07.2023 01:42

I'm going to have to disagree about this calendar, arbitrarily adding 10,000 years to the Christian calendar is overly simplistic and myopic. Why not pick an actual date based on an actual event that is significant, dateable and predates all recorded human history? I nominate 7288 B.C., the year of "varve zero" in Sweden. It marks the splitting of the Scandinavian icecap and a transformation of climate throughout the northern hemisphere.

Ответить
Someone Somewhere
Someone Somewhere - 06.07.2023 21:17

Me: yellow duck language

Ответить
Владимир Федоров
Владимир Федоров - 05.07.2023 23:59

12023 here, really thinking we should return to Göbecli Tepe stage and start over at this point. Funnily enough, that is exactly the stage our governments, mine among the most active, would get us, it seems.

Ответить
Admrial zhukov Yuri
Admrial zhukov Yuri - 05.07.2023 20:34

Yo this giy teaches us better than school

Ответить
Atlas
Atlas - 03.07.2023 16:53

only that ancient cultures no longer exist the world is dominated by Christian civilizations to such an extent that even China uses the Gregorian calendar... a new era of humanity in which the ancient perception of the world has been erased began with the birth of Jesus, which is why, unfortunately, we have the year 2023 and not 12023, 1547, 2776, 2346 or 5023

Ответить
TheFaxMachine
TheFaxMachine - 02.07.2023 21:49

Who’s still watching in 13,110

Ответить
Micky Brand
Micky Brand - 02.07.2023 11:18

The way in which we divide history never made any sense to me. Why was it necessary? Isn't all history important enough to be part of the human story?
The concept proposed in this video is a lot more scientific and rational.

Ответить
WanderingEnby
WanderingEnby - 30.06.2023 19:09

Still digging this concept in 12,023 and planning to build it into the app I'm working on!

Ответить
Moreno Franco
Moreno Franco - 30.06.2023 13:46

Makes sense. The BCE was introduced to replace BC - before Christ. But counting from the beginning of Recorded History makes more sense. The current Hebrew year is 5783. 3760 years longer than the modern calendar.

Ответить
Wayne Tryda
Wayne Tryda - 30.06.2023 07:42

I disagree with the year. Three reasons.
I don't think that people whose cultures have different calendars (some lunar) will change.
The third is that it will help people understand the full time scale of "civilized" humans...best term I can come up with.
Personally, I feel insulted that a number change in the calendar helps me think. I am 70 with a bit more than a high school diploma. But even I know about the lost underground city in present Turkey (whatever the new spelling is). And I am one of those who believe that the marks on the Sphinx are caused by water. By needed weather conditions setting the Egyptian culture maybe 5 millennia earlier. So to me a year change is just magic trick. Dates are just a useful tool to place things chronologically.
That is why I gave the thumbs down. But, in contrast, it is still history so I am now subscribed.
The old saying "There's a method behind the madness." comes to mind. My disagreement is respectable.
That there might be cultures yet undiscovered to set an even earlier date. Then, another change.

Ответить
Andrew Denis
Andrew Denis - 29.06.2023 12:32

12,000 years ago was just the last reset. Try several more resets of 12,000 to many times that before it.

Ответить
Charles Burnett
Charles Burnett - 28.06.2023 22:43

The Gregorian calendar is more like a countdown timer to the end of the Human era. This calendar is counting down the return of Jesus the Anointed which is why it lists BC and AD. In theory it will expire in 2048 but won't be needed if it exceeds 2068. This is a Christian perspective not shared with China which is currently using a different calendar.

Ответить
Sky high
Sky high - 24.06.2023 11:26

Well I’m in 2023

Ответить
Glitc H
Glitc H - 23.06.2023 10:39

12,023 anyone?👋

Ответить
donovanpham900
donovanpham900 - 23.06.2023 07:04

12,2023

Ответить
Hiếu
Hiếu - 22.06.2023 19:00

crazy how we just use one guy's approximate year of birth as the way we tell the years apart

Ответить
ARTish
ARTish - 19.06.2023 19:37

Dear Sire and mademoiselle, welcome to the year 12023, altho half of it is already over but still

Ответить
Frank Bradford
Frank Bradford - 16.06.2023 07:59

Look at this white male perspective on when the human era began. So it starts with building a structure? Really? All those people and contributors up until then don’t count huh? Why doesn’t it start with the first to figure out what things are edible? Why not start with the first to migrate beyond their birth location. Why not the discovery of fire, water, or the wheel? I hate it when things get presented as fact when they are just a western perspective

Ответить
Adam McInnes
Adam McInnes - 16.06.2023 07:59

I think that it's a neat idea, but I am left with a question: what do we denote years prior to the Human Era calendar? For example, the site at Triquet Island is ~2,000 years before the start of the HE calendar, and the site at Dolní Věstonice is ~13,000 years before the start of the HE calendar.

Or at that point, do we simply just switch to using the years before present calendar (BP, which us a system that measures the years before 1950)? Afterall, when we talk about these sites, we aren't saying that they date to c. 12,000 BCE and c. 23,000 BCE, respectively, but rather how many years before present they existed.

And as an extreme example, it's not like we're saying that the Chicxulub asteroid impact that coincides with the extinction of non-avian dinosaurs happened in 66,040,977 BCE ± 43,000 years, we say 66.043 ± 0.043 Ma.

I think that just using BP is fine for dates older than the HE calendar.

Ответить
Oren
Oren - 11.06.2023 09:45

Implementing this calendar would remind us that we’re not children as a species anymore. If we are faced with our own true age, we should probably stop acting like children who don’t understand the implications of our childish behavior, and start to behave more sustainably.

Ответить
Maxim Budeanu
Maxim Budeanu - 10.06.2023 05:03

12023 here

Ответить
The Highlander
The Highlander - 02.06.2023 14:55

Cry about it, atheist.

The Gregorian calendar stays.

Ответить
Sam Harper
Sam Harper - 01.06.2023 07:32

Are we going to have to change the calendar every time archaeologists find something new showing that humans started building things or domesticating dogs at an earlier date?

Ответить
abdulkadir pekeroglu
abdulkadir pekeroglu - 31.05.2023 12:52

and now is 12023 if you wish. much happened lately..

Ответить
Pistion21
Pistion21 - 29.05.2023 01:19

12023

Ответить
Goner_Hannibal
Goner_Hannibal - 27.05.2023 10:31

Someone in year 12,023??

Ответить
crazymusicgrl
crazymusicgrl - 24.05.2023 06:28

Guy is offended because the date talks about Christ. Almost unsubbed

Ответить