Does Wooden Great Pyramid Relic Re-Date the Ancient Structure?

More like 5,000 years older

Maybe they were movement joints incase of earth quake or settling .

I think theses small channels were used to pull ropes to pull up stones. With the help of sarcophags of serapheum.
Something like the Falkirk wheel.

Because there's simply no way this Egyptian colleague of Hawass would plant a copy of the artifact made from a piece of historical wood.
The fact it benefits herself, Hawass, the Egyptian government, the archaeology industry, and many other powerful interests, should just be ignored, because a sweet middle-aged academic lady would never lie. 😂

So.. an Egyptian with ties to Hawass just happened to find the missing piece of wood, which just happens to support Hawass's interests, and the greater interests of organised archaeology.
Because no one ever forged an artifact using old paper or wood to fool carbon dating, right? 😂

If its up to me , these pyramids should be removed, just satanic structures made by demons, do not know what value they have

Carbon dating is known to be unreliable. So the date might be “accurate” and might not be.

Someone should tell Zahi 😂

There's contention around which masonry shaft the Dixon artifacts were discovered in. Later or earlier deposited artifacts cannot possibly date the structure. Next...

Also, custody of the wood is vulnerable. Lost in the collection, nothing prohibits someone from swapping other "dated" wood, for the original wood. This is not sound research, science, etc.

Plenty of horseshit attached to these artifacts, and the dating, and custody. Surely, not sound evidence by which to date the time of construction.

The Old Wood problem is always an issue, so is later, or much later introduction of organic material.

Appreciate your research... Giza's Old Kingdom dating paradigm is inaccurate. The unsophisticated 4th Dynasty could not have produced two interior features with their seked mathematics. Happy to share if you want. Keep up the good work.

Good video mate 👍

Ok, now just to prove that the wood actually comes from the center portion of 500 years old tree. Because those are the part of trees from which handles are made, right? Am I the only one finding this reasoning utterly ridiculous? What is wrong with this clown?

shes not real egyptian

Heartwood and sap wood are chemically distinct. Testing for this will rule out some hypothesises. It is also worth noting that older trees aren't necessarily more commercially viable to fell. Thry will often have internal rot, resulting in hollowing. A 8ft truck would also be very labour intensive to fell, particularly with copper axes. You could probably fell 30 100 year old cedars for the same effort to fell a single 700 year old one and get a better yield of wood with zero risk of heart rot.

The ball, the string, and the rod. (I'm assuming the hook object once had string wrapped around it).
Aren't these ancient tools used to plot out a building design?

Edit- nevermind...

My hammer with a wooden handle was from my Grandfather. But it doesn't mean the statue I used a chisel with it is made in the 1930's. It was built in 2025.

Maybe they made carts with a so called bed of ball bearings to move the stones Just a comment to support channel

Maybe the piece if wood is 500 years older than the pyramid? Had been hanging around some other ruin, and was THEN taken and used on great pyramid? Would not have to change year of construction. idk...

I'm not an expert in this field, but I still have my doubts. Who can guarantee or prove that these three objects were found in the Great Pyramid? I mean, 100% certain. However, I think people 5,000 years ago were capable of building them. Problem-solving intelligence was even more advanced back then than it is today. Technological advancements, such as those in computers, have nothing to do with human intelligence. Therefore, I don't believe our generation is smarter; I just think we're more technologically advanced. So, aliens definitely don't have anything to do with this, but I still wonder why so many older sites around the world are more advanced than later ones. Was there really an ancient civilization that was wiped out, and whose knowledge we lost over time, perhaps through wars and the destruction of evidence?

Great video with great reporting.

Depends on where the wood piece was from. it could have been from a branch, not not the center of the tree trunk. Possibly the reign of khufu is older than current estimate (ie his reign was from around 3000 BC, instead of 2590 BC.

Nice work as always Matt! Thanks for the summary and continuing to follow this relic. I remember when it was first re discovered and you posted right away, very exciting time. Nice revisit.

Instead of coming up with more and more complex explanations how Khufu built the Great Pyramid in just 20 years, let's accept the more realistic theory - the great pyramid was built over the lives of 3, 5, or maybe 10 pharaohs.

That is true with many things. I have a mammoth ivory cross that is over 50,000 years old. The carving is 50 years old and the tusk is ancient.

It's actually evidence the pyramid dates are probably accurate. They wouldn't be using sapling wood from the same year(s) as the build. They need older sturdy wood.

great analysis.

The aliens are always leaving their tools out.....

Hey OP, here's a mind blowing thought that could be true, some of the tools that helped to build the pyramids may have been sorced in America. 😊

The copper hook was used to lower the shaft blocking stone in place. The hooks match up with the lug handles on the stone.

The reign of Khufu may have been earlier that commonly thought, the whole early Egyptian timeline may off by a few centuries.

What about the ball and copper thingy?

الباحثون إلى أن هذه النتائج قد تعود إلى ما يُعرف بمشكلة "الخشب القديم"، حيث يُستخدم الخشب لفترات طويلة قبل أن يُودع في موقعه النهائي. بالتالي، فإن تاريخ الخشب لا يعكس بالضرورة تاريخ بناء الهرم. ومع ذلك، فإن هذه النتائج تفتح المجال لمزيد من الدراسات حول تاريخ بناء الهرم واستخدام المواد فيه.

The AI voiceover ruins it. Unless this is a human that just sounds like AI. But either way, really detracts from the message.

Who needs wooden rollers or just sledges when you have balls that were supposed to be used to make an carve things so why not use them for both the making and carving and as well as rollers for the blocks to roll upon this shows they did have such a shape back then and there would be a lot after was used to cut as well as carve stones in the process though there should been a lot more maybe that is why there is not as most would have been ground to dust in the movement of the stone.

Какие ещё два артефакта были оставлены в пирамиде со времени постройки?

So they didn't date the organics on the hook too? The dates vs tree says to me the construction date of the pyramid is at least a few hundred years out of date. Oldest official date of pyramid 2580bc, youngest the tree could have been and still harvested is about 3000-2900bc That is still a discrepancy of up to 500 years.

I didn't watch this video but my understanding is we know exactly when these pyramids were build.
the egyptians kept records.

It's sad that The Egyptian Government is hiding something that would change the world about Ancient Egyptians.

That seems like a sound conclusion. 👍

It's fantastic that it's been found but quite appalling the way it was lost .

My grandpa told me when I was a kid that if you plant a cedar tree, when it gets big enough to shade your grave you will die. I thought it to be an odd superstition but as I get older looking at nature I realized that by the time it gets that big, you’ll be dying of old age.

Nice video! That one duck was giving head sign to everyone like saying ...is time to move ❤

You make your case clearly, but doesn't that group of items look like someone in the past threw a ball connected to a hook with a stick into the channel to test its depth or to retrieve something, in much the same way that it was tested millennia later with a rod? You put emphasis on the core masonry but this channel is an original feature that served a purpose, and was expertly concealed after its use. I have so many questions...

Just speculation on your part regarding the cedar tree being hundreds of years old . A tree as young as 20 to 40 years old can be 15 meters tall and and much easier to harvest than a grandfather tree

Why. Do. You. Commentate. And. Pause. After. Every. Word.

It makes your videos unbearable.

The carbon dating points to anywhere from 500 to 800 years earlier than conventional dating. You have a point that it doesn't necessarily date the exact time when the pyramid was bulit. However, I think you have the burden of proof to show that it was common for the Egyptians at that time to have used wood from trees that were 500-800 years old. Just because something is possible doesn't mean it is the best explanation. Even if it was a 300 year old tree, that would still push the dates back 200-500 years. Unless there is firm proof, the carbon dating suggests that they were built earlier than conventional dating.

How are you confident that sibsons door isn't an opening? Can you elaborate?

Wasn't your door the assumption for how the ticket got inside? The ticket getting inside is back to a mystery then because we roughly know it's date