Комментарии:
Perfect comparison. It is something like this that makes sense.
ОтветитьWaiting 16mm vs 28 mm
Ответитьcan you please compare rf 16mm f2.8 with 24mm 1.8?.......i know 16mm is not as bright but i want to see the angle and perspective. thanks.
ОтветитьWhich one would you recommend for Canon R50 for both photo and video use?
ОтветитьOr.... having the 16 and the 50 little RF lenses. ;-) great combo for travelling on a full frame body. next to the 100-400 perhaps 5.6-8.0 RF. Thanks for your reviews, they have helped me. :-) Greetings from the Netherlands, Onno Nugteren.
ОтветитьIll stick with my 16, 35 and 85 samyang 1.4
ОтветитьStill waiting for the old school sigma 17-50 2.8 + r7 combo 😘
ОтветитьI think it's time for a next video with the RF 28mm f/2.8 stm thrown into the mix.... :-)
It's always funny to see how Canon crowds the 24-35mm range with a lot of options whereas the 50mm really is the stepchild with either the so so budget double gauss or the crazy heavy expensive and yet not very fast focusing f/1.2 L...... It would be just so nice to combine the FE 50mm f/1.4 GM with the RF 28mm f/2.8. I'd love to see an interchangeable mount camera for RF and FE..... Or.... hey, maybe Canon could just design an RF 50mm f/1.4 USM themselves? A compact 85mm f/1.4 USM - focusing better than the f/2.0 stm - wouldn't hurt either. All funny options, those little 24-35mm primes, but adapting the EF options isn't creating big combos anyway, so maybe it's time to give the meat and potatoes portrait focal lengths some love?
Like 900🎉
ОтветитьI'd love a comparison between the 24 1.8 and the 24-70 2.8 @24mm
Ответить24mm vs 35mm Whose 1 is Bast For Wedding....????
ОтветитьHello, what do you think about sony vs canon, the colors?
ОтветитьThis question is easy to be answered: I have both!
ОтветитьI own the 24, 35, 50 and 85 (standard primes, not L) and I think they are all fantastic, though I wish the 50 had IS even if it cost a bit more. Usually I just carry 2 primes either the 24 and 50 or more often the 35 and 85. The focal length of the lenses a person already owns should be taken in to consideration when looking at 24 vs 35 as they are both great.
ОтветитьThis was very helpful. Thank you! (I think I'm going for the 35 mm version) 🙂
ОтветитьI have a Sigma 18-35 and after watching Chris reviews when the Sigma 18-35 paired with a Canon EOS R7, I sold it and got a Tamron 35mm f1.4.
I'm planning to buy this RF 24mm once I purchase a Canon EOS R7 from an EOS 77d.
I hope Canon will eventually make a 28mm version of this lens because 28mm is my favorite.
ОтветитьHello chris,for the 2 lenses you reviewed which one is better for landscape for your taste..asking recommendation
ОтветитьI went for the 24mm as I use the rf 50 1.2 for a lot of my shots so it made sense. It’s a cool lens, really happy with it
ОтветитьThanks for the comparision. Please can you also do similar comparison on a crop sensor camera body like EOS R7.
Ответить