Watchdives WD1680 (Submariner Date Homage) 4K Watch Review

Watchdives WD1680 (Submariner Date Homage) 4K Watch Review

WR4K

1 год назад

30,677 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@meow7593
@meow7593 - 28.01.2023 20:05

Is this or the steeldive sd1953 V2 better?

Ответить
@Ericdagreat
@Ericdagreat - 01.02.2023 22:23

Awesome review! I was very unlucky with mine. I had it a few days, and sent it back. Very disappointed in the quality of the bracelet. The edges are too sharp. The clasp is not bad, but those push buttons are jingly rattily, and makes it feel kind of cheap, and the edges of the clasp are razor sharp. One of the top links that do not have the push pins to adjust, was left unfinished on one side, so a hole is there to see the inside of the link… and guess what? The links are NOT solid, but hollow all in the inside of the link. They made a huge mistake of not completing the side of the link, exposing the inside, and that’s what contributed to the bracelet feeling light and cheap. Maybe the bottom links are solid, but most definitely not the top links. The caseback feels like a thin tin can when you tap it with your fingernail, so I question the 300m water resistance. The bezel did not align on mine. Crown is too long. Lume is good, magnification is good. I just received the new version of the Steeldive 1953, and it’s hands down MUCH MUCH better quality than the Watchdives. The caseback is solid, thick, bubbled, comfortable and nicely done, along with holes for standard caseback opening tools. The bezel action is solid like a good Seiko bezel, and doesn’t feel like it drags on a chalkboard like the warchdive’s bezel. The clasp feels very solid, with six holes, push buttons don’t rattle, and with the extra fold clasp security. The crown is not ridiculously long like the Watchdives version. The bracelet feels heavier, and much better made. The dial looks better made too. These two watches might have a slight resemblance, but the Steeldive most definitely pulls away from the Watchdives. Lume is the same. This is just my take from owning both. Keep up the great reviews!!

Ответить
@james241ish
@james241ish - 03.02.2023 23:52

Thanks. I'm going to buy one based on this 👍

Ответить
@theox73
@theox73 - 04.02.2023 02:06

since this watch is only 100 usd, i think im gona buy both, the steeldive and watchdive submariner homage.

Ответить
@Vginoda
@Vginoda - 04.02.2023 10:27

WR4K, 1 take, no Edits , Superb!!!!!😊

Ответить
@johnwick860
@johnwick860 - 04.02.2023 15:54

this is a great value watch

Ответить
@alientechnology5496
@alientechnology5496 - 12.02.2023 07:55

Does the bracelet have screw pins or push pins?

Ответить
@marness0
@marness0 - 15.02.2023 18:18

Hi awesome review!

Compared to the SN004 Milsub which is better quality? Is the San Martin worth the extra cost?

Ответить
@DiegoCamarero
@DiegoCamarero - 16.02.2023 18:27

Great review again. Once you had it in your hands, would you say this piece stands at the level of Cronos / San Martin submariner homages? above? below? Thank you.

Ответить
@SlimWhittman
@SlimWhittman - 25.02.2023 18:49

First off, Great review! I own this watch. I'm very hard on my watches and as a result I recently broke my Pagani Design sub homage. I bought this watchdives version by accident because at first glance I thought it was a San Martin for a clearance sale price. Upon receipt I was disappointed at first feeling like I had made a mistake in hastily buying without reading the ad. After sizing and wearing the watch for a few hours I quickly realized I was wrong to think that. I'm completely satisfied with this watch and I'm so happy to have it. This watch is fantastic. The watch itself is much higher quality than the PD version I replaced, and the bracelet isn't as cheap feeling as some other reviewers implied. It is easily on par with my San Martin sub homage at 1/3 of the cost. It is a heavy watch but not quite as heavy as the San Martin and I like that. In fact I think I like this watch better than my San Martin's, which are honestly not far off the quality feel of my actual Rolex no date sub. I strongly recommend this watch.

Ответить
@NemanjaSmiljkovic
@NemanjaSmiljkovic - 07.03.2023 09:35

Hello, what is the best homage watch brand? I recently ordered PD-1661, still waiting delivery. I'm scared i made maybe a mistake. As i heard from your videos, pd-1661 is great but lume sux.
Does steeldive made better option by adding super-luminova or pd is better quality? What's your opinion, what is the best option?

Ответить
@Silverd15
@Silverd15 - 10.03.2023 00:33

Hi, which watch would you recommend, the Watchdives WD1680 or the new Steeldive SD1953 with the milled clasp. Also which one has a better bracelet?

Ответить
@PorknBeansss
@PorknBeansss - 11.03.2023 08:48

why is this cheaper compare to san martin sn 017-g v3 submariner ?

Ответить
@dizzylee7215
@dizzylee7215 - 27.03.2023 01:40

Interesting choice. After watching another of your reviews. I purchased the SN017-G
Thank you.

Ответить
@23727bgk
@23727bgk - 04.04.2023 03:36

I purchased the sterile version of this watch in blue from Watchdives for around $70. I replaced the bracelet (it was the 3 micro adjust stamped flip lock clasp) with a Barton silicone Elite strap. Mine is rated 200m. The only flaws on this particular watch is the lume pip is slightly misaligned and the NH35a could use calibrating. Definitely the best value Rolex sub available. I think a few of these brands are made in the same factory; they have an online video showing some of the assembly process. The sterile models appear to be currently sold out.

Ответить
@Dirtywesterner
@Dirtywesterner - 06.04.2023 05:04

I have just received the cronos homage of the cookie monster, and I have to say that the watchdives version is on par with it , and in terms of price really comes out ahead-I paid $99 and $167 respectively , and the cronos is the full lume version which had been around $230 before the sale. It’s not a bad watch by any means but it’s janky glide lock doesn’t warrant the price difference,though many of the components are surely either the same or from the manufacturer next door,but under the same warehouse roof.. I had to see for myself and the extra money is not worth it

Ответить
@AlmightyOne24
@AlmightyOne24 - 20.04.2023 13:22

In your opinion is this better than the SD1953 v2 with Jubilee bracelet?

Ответить
@indratan6304
@indratan6304 - 08.05.2023 04:17

Sir? How is the watcdive lume compare to steeldive lume? Which one is brighter? Are they equal?

Ответить
@nigelbowler1601
@nigelbowler1601 - 24.05.2023 20:18

Nice review i agree I own a old SD 1953 with the old clasp impressed with the overaĺl finish i am tempted to purchase this watch.

Ответить
@daresome1
@daresome1 - 29.05.2023 20:28

Okay, I’m sold. Put one in the cart during your interview. Now sleep on it before I pull the pin.

Ответить
@darkchocolate4643
@darkchocolate4643 - 30.05.2023 14:18

As I mentioned in another comment, Watchdives doesn't have an EU website, but I did reach out to them and they informed me that "they are planning to open an AliExpress store in the near future." Just thought I'd throw it out there for anyone else in the EU considering this watch, as AliExpress adds on VAT, so there are no unpleasant surprises when it comes to added import tax when the parcel lands on your doorstep.

Ответить
@darkchocolate4643
@darkchocolate4643 - 30.05.2023 19:11

Question for you, since you mention that this watch comes with a very long bracelet. Are there enough removable links to shorten this bracelet to fit my 6.25"/16cm wrist? If my eyes don't deceive me when you're holding the watch sideways, there are only two more removable links on each side of the clasp. I'm not sure that'll be enough, considering you have an 8" wrist.

Ответить
@ahsan101
@ahsan101 - 06.06.2023 07:38

Bought this watch and the bezel action is very tight. I can't move it with the ends my fingers 😢

Ответить
@comeonman7423
@comeonman7423 - 09.06.2023 10:22

Would love to see a comparison between this and the Rolex Submariner

Ответить
@vlk092
@vlk092 - 09.06.2023 23:46

how does this one compare with the steeldive 1953? just bought that fella for 80 bucks

Ответить
@duyanh8981
@duyanh8981 - 22.06.2023 03:11

Sir, do you know the dial size ? Im planning a seiko mod

Ответить
@comeonman7423
@comeonman7423 - 23.06.2023 03:57

In terms of dimensions how does it compare to the sub?

Ответить
@andrewduckworth4720
@andrewduckworth4720 - 23.06.2023 23:52

Great review I have just purchased one of these on the strength of your well detailed video thanks heaps

Ответить
@BITCOIN-jg5ug
@BITCOIN-jg5ug - 09.07.2023 11:42

so which is better this one of the steeldive submariner?

Ответить
@MrPINKFL0YD
@MrPINKFL0YD - 10.07.2023 18:24

Bought it used and mint. It's an absolute bargain!

Ответить
@comeonman7423
@comeonman7423 - 16.07.2023 12:11

Do you know any decent aftermarket bracelet I could purchase for this watch? Do you think the SKX013 bracelet would fit?

Ответить
@masquerades8666
@masquerades8666 - 17.07.2023 19:28

Hi bud Will you be reviewing the quarzt version of this . I must say the indexs dont look as white as the bezel ones. Is this the case in real life or just on video. Cheers👍

Ответить
@adrianocaporro639
@adrianocaporro639 - 27.07.2023 20:38

Does anyone know the import duties if bought from their website to UK? Thanks

Ответить
@masudashizue777
@masudashizue777 - 28.07.2023 16:24

Take my money already.

Ответить
@clifforddriver9434
@clifforddriver9434 - 29.07.2023 03:21

I just purchased this same watch on Poshmark for $70. 00, for the price this is one hell of a time piece, thanks for the review.

Ответить
@hiramabiff885
@hiramabiff885 - 01.08.2023 18:12

Evil man! I think this is my sixth watch I ordered from your reviews. Just snagged it for $89. on Watchdives weekly sale with $5. shipping. When I receive it I will amend this comment and compare it to my Cronos Kermit which cost a lot more money. I will also compare it to my two previously owned Rolex Sea Dwellers, neither of which were as accurate as my two Cronos watches, my Phylida PT5000 007 or my Octopus Kraken.

Update 13 Aug: I've had my WD1680 for two days. Firstly, in all respects the head of the piece is absolutely spectacular. At first the crown action seemed stiff but after using it I realized the gaskets are really sealing the crown mechanism. It is running +6 seconds a day. In contrast my much more expensive Cronos Kermit with the PT5000 movement runs -15 seconds per day. The only issue is the Watchdives bracelet. The clasp edges are extremely sharp on the short edges of the long clasp top. There is no edge smoothing whatsoever. I immediately took it off and replaced it with a spare Cronos bracelet with glide lock. If I get in the mood I will take my Dremel tool and smooth the edges and then I may re-install it. I cannot believe this watch was $89. My Octopus Kraken is running within COSC specification, which is astonishing.

Ответить
@ntnacs3879
@ntnacs3879 - 08.08.2023 20:17

Just bought this because of this video. First time discovering your channel and I'm sad there are no more uploads. Enjoy the retirement.

Ответить
@clifforddriver9434
@clifforddriver9434 - 09.08.2023 07:32

I just got my new one that I purchased from the store in the United States. I paid less than one hundred dollars for the watch. I can't believe the quality of this piece. Now I need to remove two links on both sides so it will fit my wrist.

Ответить
@oscaraldeguer
@oscaraldeguer - 12.10.2023 23:14

Your channel is such a gem, getting this one over the steeldive version!

Ответить
@oscaraldeguer
@oscaraldeguer - 19.10.2023 20:11

Just received this watch. When rotating the crown, should it feel and sound like gears moving? Or should it be 100% smooth with no sound? First time with a mechanism like this and trying to figure out if it's damaged or it's normal lol

Ответить
@alenjack3496
@alenjack3496 - 07.11.2023 12:41

Which one would you prefer steeldive sd1953 or watchdives wd1680 ?

Ответить
@valueink
@valueink - 11.11.2023 19:23

Has this been discontinued?

Ответить
@naturerules3371
@naturerules3371 - 15.01.2024 23:41

This review was FANTASTIC! Extremely thorough! I have been watching watch reviews for 3 days now and you are the absolute BEST at it! I very much appreciate what you do! Thank you!

Ответить
@duanelee2016
@duanelee2016 - 22.02.2024 15:56

Thank you, and I will miss your streight forward reviews. I went with the 1680Q version(s)...they are different from the reviewed 1680 as the hands are both thinner(smaller) and shorter. Not correct for the watch, probably i'm the only one to notice? The bezel scallops are slippery as well( looks nice but poor grip) The Pagani design PD 1661 is a better(automatic) watch except the bezel is more easily turned and of course poor lume. However, Given the price/value/quality, Pagani is clearly the winner dispite shortcomings.

Ответить
@syahrulk9294
@syahrulk9294 - 24.02.2024 12:20

please review the WD 1680 quarts. Is the quality the same as the automatic one?

Ответить
@gingataff
@gingataff - 13.03.2024 13:30

This video got me very interested in the WD1680 but then I found out there is a WD5510 which is supposed to be better although the bezel doesn't have lume. Waiting for an Ali sale to make a decision.

Ответить
@Dirtywesterner
@Dirtywesterner - 29.03.2024 15:09

I’m astonished at how much yellower the bezel markers and the indices are in comparison to the San Martin version of this-for a moment I thought someone had pulled a switcheroo on me but it is the same one. The San Martin vs scratches the submariner itch best for me,although these watches differ in their logos and shade of white, I think they’re a milimeter apart in case size 😅

Ответить
@richardvacanti9428
@richardvacanti9428 - 30.03.2024 09:13

You didn’t talk about the bracelet at all or very little.

Ответить
@vlk092
@vlk092 - 03.05.2024 14:17

Hey! Could you review the new watch dives WD 007? Cheers!

Ответить