What Happens Inside a Proton?

If you're on the spectrum you'll love this channel

i love that shirt, i need to just buy it

Ive heard Joe Rogan has taken DFT

A lot of quark sh*t happens! Thats what happens 😂

“But there’s no time to explain that right now” lmao who are you? What is this? Back to the future? 🤣

God I hate this guy’s voice.

That was cool.

If you add enough pressure, the electron will boogie and the proton and neutron will become a big phat NEUTRON, if we keep adding pressure/temperature, it will release NUTRINOS and begin to loose volume. That’s how we get a black hole cracking. 💯my only concern with so much information is that, each thought which led to each individual gain in intelligence, put with what we’ve gained via the information, and our result is monitored, we should arrive somewhere in between thinking this is too much information, based solely on theory, and that it simultaneously seems PROBABLE and TRUE, makes me think if we had not put so much mental power into space, but looked at it as a child. Simplicity. Just a different way of doing things. That one challenged me. 😂❤in a good way. Sorry for my poor grammar. I have a couple theories. 1. IS MATTER CAUSING THE EXPANSION? If we replace space with a swimming pool. And replace BLACK HOLE CORES with BEACH BALLS. The ball acts just like it need to for our purposes. It keeps the water out, and takes up empty space displacing the water. When we began we were hot and dense, we cooled and solidified. Filling up all that EMPTY SPACE (cosmological constant) must SWELL IT OUT NO? ☑️💯😎

Small correction:
Not infinite.... As Planck length is not infinitely small. Tho, still too high resolution to fit to computer memory.

The probably falls as 1/137 squared. 4 digits down, you should know that Matt

I wonder if the universe knows the ultimate compression algorithm that doesn’t require as much information storage for a molecule as we think it does…

The old physicists were better than us

I like this guy, I want more of this guy

This guy's face has always pissed me off but since he has gotten some more muscle, it has been less uncanny and I can now watch these. :)

Matt says "...spacetime..." half way through the video. I'm like "that was over quickly!"

Physics gives me a HADRON.

You know something's going to be good when you hear "the comparably 'simple' quantum electrodynamics"

Simulation of tiny patches of Space-Space. Lattice QCD.

It's not complicated, there are laws "outside" of the universe that nest the laws we experience. We can't access the "outside" laws only the laws we experience like classical physics and quantum mechanics etc.. The reason why scientists dismiss "outside" laws is that funding will be cut. So we get desperate scientists trying to keep their funding. Let's face it, non local influence can only be explained with "outside" laws. But I'm called a crank because I think we should limit funding to this. We will never access the data that predicts the position of a particle through wave function collapse or when a specific particle decays. So we call it probabilistic. It's not probabilistic. We know about flatland and how it can't access 3D space or understand it. Scientists will never give up which I'm happy for. But we do not need a larger collider than we have right now we have bigger problems.

Dr.Matt: great vid as usual. So what I think I heard you say in fewer words, is that Feynman diagrams are really kind of the same as orthogonal functions, and in QED the amplitude coefficient of each diagram (each orthogonal function) decreases by a factor of 1/137 leading to a rapidly converging series that one can truncate with the accuracy needed. But in QCD that constant doesn’t roll off quickly so one has to take a different tack because effectively the series of Feynman diagrams does not converge, (at least rapidly). Hence the QCD grid or crystal approach.

I would like a video about the effects of inflation on the QCD vacuum - That foam being expanded/blown up as a snapshot into universal scale looks kinda similar to the cosmic structure etc

Model at Planck lengths, watch a supercomputer crash. :/
Of course, even then we'd have problems describing precisely why lithium is so weird.

I am soooo dumb. This is just a different language.

I love the fact that there is a program that goes somewhat in-depth in physics. It is a rare find in my experience.

Just turn on ray tracing. Goodness.

Anyone else find the complexity of quantum mechanics nauseating/mind numbing?

Aren't photons and weak force W+- and Z bosons involved in quark interactions too? Only adding to their complexity.

Why would you want to simulate a proton or a molecule when you can just let the real thing show you what it's doing? For example, instead of simulating how different molecules interact with each other, you can just let the Chemistry do the job by simply mixing the real stuffs together. Whatever turns out is the answer you're looking for. What it the point of simulating Chemistry? Just eat the burger & see what comes out the other end, no simulation required...

Sophon

Do you also feel that this all sounds something like a Buddhist or Hindu philosophical text - emptiness, energy, incomprehensible, incalculable ... waves ... mystery OM 🕉️😂 And those mysterios symbols and equations ༄༅།།ལྷ་བྲིས། Reality is so wierd!

Could it be possible that the universe using the cmd analogy, as a whole make a giant whole in space like the planets do? If so what would that look like with the rest of the universe around it, I think it might be different than in the multi universe with universes floating around

I've been waiting for this for years. QED and QCD are stepping stones to the lattice. The lattice has been so obvious as the next step for many years. We just need quantum computing capability to provide enough calculating power that can handle the factorials. We're finally on the cusp of new physics. It's been a long wait.

I wish science communicators would stop saying that we KNOW. We don't, we have mathematical models that have been tweaked to agree with the indirect observations we can make.

There is no concrete evidence for the existence of quarks. We will never, ever be able to observe one in the wild.

That does not take anything away for the very impressive und succesful theories that have been developed. But please, stick to the truth, they are models.

how can time be ANYTHING else than the current dimension n +1 ? But of course, that emplies the dimensions are epistemically real, which they are not. x=0 exists nowhere

You cannot use monte carlo with feinman unless you remove the impossible paths. If you do the opposite you will have a significantly non-zero chance of theorizing something impossible.

😮😅😮😮well ingormeti0n.Good show 😅

I find it so amazing for some reason that all this amazingly complex beautiful physics ends with basically extending out a graph line till it intersects the axis...and thats like, it

batman could solve the equation

Feynman is the king of particle physics

Everyone is so worried about AI, I'm more worried about this latest big push to understand the brain. When the brain is completely understood who knows what massive hacks will arise and will we even know we've been hacked. Maybe thats a great filter.

The inside of protons are both alive and dead, until you open one up and see...

Couldn't we build the lattice using Planck lengths for the vector points. It isn't the smallest measurement possible. Any smaller and the particles would overlap to the point of terminal interference .

Note: I hope I used the term vector point correctly? I'm new to all this.

We just have to simulate the parts in detail, the simulated people are looking deeper into. The rest of it can be less detailed. Just like LOD in games.

Great video!

You guys really need to make a playlist of all quantum phyics videos have starting at the very beggining. It's hard to come in without a strong understanding of quarks or gluons etc.