Why China is interested in Arunachal Pradesh (Tawang) | India China border conflict / Tawang clash

Why China is interested in Arunachal Pradesh (Tawang) | India China border conflict / Tawang clash

Amit Sengupta

3 года назад

1,784,663 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@titi2160
@titi2160 - 04.09.2024 08:41

Arunachal pradesh belongs to china and assam, tripura belongs to bangladesh as these were the property of these countries.

Ответить
@kpnaidu9999
@kpnaidu9999 - 02.09.2024 18:43

❤❤ one word ❤❤
China want russia, china want mangolia, china want taiwan, china want vietnam, china want Philippines, chuna want india, china wants pakisthan, china want tibet, china wants Afghanistan, china wants africa, china wants iran, china wants turkimensthan, chuna wants srilanka, china wants bangladesh, china wants entire world 🌎🌍. China wants to become britishers.

❤ China thinks that if we occupy india, we will occupy entire world 🌎🌍
❤ China wants to make globe as a milatory play geound
❤ Finally china wants to occupy moon.
❤❤ Sir china is MOST CUNNING COUNTRY IN THE world

Ответить
@kpnaidu9999
@kpnaidu9999 - 02.09.2024 18:37

❤❤CHINA IS MOST CUNNING COUNTRY IN THE WORLD..
CHINA IS A DUPLICATE COUNTRY IN THE WORLD 🌎🌍❤❤
CHINA AND AMERICA, CANADA, PAKISTHAN, AFGHANISTAN, TURKEY, SIRIA, BANGLADESH, BROTON ARE DANGEROUS TO WORLD PEACE 🕊️....
❤❤ INDIA, RUSSIA, ISRAEL , TAIWAN, THAILAND, AUSTRALIA, SOUTH AFRICA, BRAZIL, BELGIUM ARE GOOD COUNTRIES..❤❤❤

Ответить
@Jacksparrow-jo6pz
@Jacksparrow-jo6pz - 24.08.2024 04:23

All india 💕 love's The graet seven seven sister State,s

Ответить
@user-nw6ef7yw3g
@user-nw6ef7yw3g - 22.08.2024 18:58

Modi ji please claim and annexed kailash mansarovar from China it belong to india from centuries

Ответить
@Snowland_Man
@Snowland_Man - 21.08.2024 13:53

This is what happens if you consider Tibet is part of China.

India Govt should change the foreign policy before too late.

Tibet is India and Chinese Neighbour Country which was not part of China until the illegal military occupation.

Thank you

Ответить
@eliazmarlin1122
@eliazmarlin1122 - 02.08.2024 22:43

arunachal belongs to china...

Ответить
@tenzingnorbu1757
@tenzingnorbu1757 - 31.07.2024 13:23

Tawang is not India

Ответить
@bonsai_kingdom
@bonsai_kingdom - 22.07.2024 06:53

这地方本来就是属于中国的,原住民是藏族和珞巴族,印度后来非法移民至150万

Ответить
@PomegranateChocolate
@PomegranateChocolate - 05.07.2024 20:35

This is how the dispute happened in chronological order.

1912: In the first full year of the Republic of China after the fall of the Qing dynasty, the United States National Geographic Magazine dedicated an issue to China. Accompanying the issue is a large and detailed fold-out map of China. The map clearly shows that Dirang Dzong (德讓宗) and Tawang (達旺) are within the boundary of China.

1943: British India likely calculated that dealing with the Lhasa government was easier than with the Republic of China's Nationalist Government in extracting land concessions and proposed to the United States to recognize Tibet's right to exchange diplomatic representatives with other powers. The Americans rejected this proposal:

"The Government of the United States has borne in mind the fact that the Chinese Government has long claimed suzerainty over Tibet and that the Chinese constitution lists Tibet among areas constituting the territory of the Republic of China. This Government has at no time raised a question regarding either of those claims."

1944: British India annexed Dirang Dzong (德讓宗), a Tibetan-settled area. Dzong means fort in Tibetan. The Chinese Government (the Nationalist Government of the Republic of China, seated in Kunming at the time because of World War II) protested to the British. So did the Tibetan Lhasa government.

1945: British India intruded into the tribal area of South Tibet.

February 1947: The Chinese Nationalist Government lodged a complaint with the Indian mission, which was by then newly established in China, on British India's border intrusions into Chinese territory.

August 1947: Britain left South Asia, and India was created as the successor polity to the departed British. India's creation means that a country that historically did not exist suddenly appears on China's doorstep.

October 1947: The Tibetan Lhasa Government dispatched a formal request to New Delhi, asking the newly independent Indian Government to withdraw all its predecessors' intrusions into the territory between the McMahon Line and the traditional border beneath the foothills and return a wide swath of territory from Ladakh to Assam, including Sikkim and the Darjeeling district.

1949: When the defeat of the Nationalist Government in China's civil war was imminent, the Republic of China's ambassador in New Delhi reminded the Indian Government that China did not recognize the McMahon Line and held the Simla Convention invalid.

October 1949: The CCP (Chinese Communist Party) took control of the mainland, and its civil war rival, the Republic of China, retreated to Taiwan.

December 1949: India recognized the People's Republic of China as the legitimate government, effectively cutting off the diplomatic channel the Republic of China used to deliver its protests to India.

February 1951: India annexed Tawang (達旺), the birthplace of the Sixth Dalai Lama and home to the four-hundred-year-old Tawang Monastery. The Tibetan authorities in Lhasa protested but were simply informed by the Indian political officer that India was taking over Tawang. The Tibetans protested again, accusing the Indian Government of 'seizing as its own what did not belong to it.' The Tibetans went on to ask New Delhi to withdraw its forces from Tawang immediately. The protests were ignored. The Republic of China (which had already retreated to Taiwan by then and had no diplomatic relation with India) also vehemently denounced India's territorial travesty. Curiously the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) made no noise.

1954: India published a new map showing South Tibet as part of India. The map also shows the two neighbors of China, Sikkim and Bhutan, as part of India. Sikkim has been a neighbor of China for many hundreds of years and has enjoyed good relations. In the 18th century, Sikkim was briefly overrun by the Nepalese Gorkhas, and the Sikkim king fled to China seeking help. The then Qianlong emperor dispatched an expedition to Sikkim, expelled the Gorkhas, and restored Sikkim's sovereignty and independence. Sikkim remained unmolested for the rest of its history until it was annexed by India in 1975. Bhutan is another neighbor of China, and their proximity is evident simply by comparing the flags of Bhutan and the Qing dynasty of China.

January 1959: The CCP (Chinese Communist Party) commented for the first time on the issue of South Tibet when Zhou Enlai, in a letter to Nehru, offered to concede South Tibet to India. However, India rejected the offer, as it also claims Aksai Chin as part of India. Aksai Chin is located in an area that is very hard to access from the Indian side due to difficult terrain. This is evidenced by the fact that China was able to build a road there over two years without India even noticing, and India only became aware of it when reading an article from China describing the construction project. This clearly indicates that India not only has no control over the area but also lacks visual access to the region.

1960: India started establishing posts (border markers) north of South Tibet (north of the McMahon Line) and proclaiming that it has the right to unilaterally 'improve' the McMahon Line as it sees fit.

October 1962: After years of warning, China attacked India's position in South Tibet and recovered Tawang shortly. Three weeks later, in a second wave, China recovered the whole of South Tibet.

November 1962: China unilaterally withdrew back to the north of the McMahon line.

1975: India annexed Sikkim.

1987: India made South Tibet a state and renamed it the so-called Arunachal Pradesh. The Republic of China (Taiwan) put out a statement denouncing India. Here is the statement:

"In regard to the issue of the Indian government's illegal occupation of our country's territory and the establishment of the so-called 'Arunachal Pradesh,' the foreign ministry of the Republic of China issued the following announcement at midnight: India's illegal occupation of our country's territory has been repeatedly stated by the Government of the Republic of China as something it will not recognize. Recently, the Indian Congress unilaterally passed the establishment of 'Arunachal Pradesh' to the south of the so-called McMahon Line. The Indian Government also made it a state. The Government of the Republic of China once again solemnly proclaims that the Government of India intends to legitimize its illegal occupation of Chinese territory. The Government of the Republic of China regards this as illegal, void, and absolutely not recognized."

2008: With the return of Hong Kong to China, Britain effectively withdrew from its colonial involvement in Asia, and Tibet lost its utility as a potential bargaining chip in British negotiations with China concerning Hong Kong. With no remaining interests in Tibet, Britain could afford to be forthright for once. The British government issued a statement acknowledging China's sovereignty over Tibet (previously recognized as suzerainty, not sovereignty). This statement, endorsed by both the Conservative and Labour parties, is notable for its candor in admitting Britain's past territorial ambitions in Tibet and adopts an almost apologetic tone. Here is an excerpt:

"...But our position is unusual for one reason of history that has been imported into the present: the anachronism of our formal position on whether Tibet is part of China, and whether in fact we harbour continued designs to see the break-up of China. We do not.​​

Our ability to get our points across has sometimes been clouded by the position the UK took at the start of the 20th century on the status of Tibet, a position based on the geopolitics of the time. Our recognition of China's "special position" in Tibet developed from the outdated concept of suzerainty. Some have used this to cast doubt on the aims we are pursuing and to claim that we are denying Chinese sovereignty over a large part of its own territory. We have made clear to the Chinese Government, and publicly, that we do not support Tibetan independence. Like every other EU member state, and the United States, we regard Tibet as part of the People's Republic of China. "​​

2014: A Tibetan Chinese named Nido Tania from Arunachal Pradesh (occupied South Tibet) went to Delhi and was beaten to death because he 'looked Chinese.'

2024: In the 1990s, India subtly probed the People's Republic of China (PRC), leading to the inference that China's position on South Tibet had hardened, despite the PRC officially maintaining ambiguity on the matter. It has become evident that China's earlier offer to cede South Tibet is no longer available, as China has explicitly stated that South Tibet is part of its territory. This stance mirrors the positions of both the Tibetan Lhasa Government and its civil war rival, the Republic of China (Taiwan).

Ответить
@Hendrik-gu2ej
@Hendrik-gu2ej - 26.06.2024 16:30

Tawang is a Chinese name, you suckers.

Ответить
@Mei-gongchangdangNb
@Mei-gongchangdangNb - 21.06.2024 08:07

尼泊尔收复失地。

Ответить
@ganeshdore
@ganeshdore - 16.06.2024 21:23

Warlike acts by China by release from Dams on Brahmaputra is a serious issue.
Very Serious.

Causing drought by blocking Brahmaputra water may be a concern only during
Jan Feb March. From April onwards,,there is sufficient snow melt for Bharat.

British and Nehru failed to purchase upper Brahmaputra from Tibet in 1930.
Nehru also failed to secure India rights to Kailash
Also rights to Cox's Bazar during Partition talks in 1941.and Martins Island.
Thus Greater Nagaland has no Ocean access.

Total strategic failure. Unbelievable.

Then we have that 1948 POK Strategic blunder.

Nepal . SriLanka and Maldives. Should have taken that also in 1930.

Nation Building with Secure Borders requires resolve, vision and guts.

Ответить
@ahvidaneidavirgilluminous8754
@ahvidaneidavirgilluminous8754 - 13.06.2024 17:07

Chinese revealed they withdrew from Arunachal Pradesh cos snow avalanche blocked the supplies, they didn’t have much of helicopter units. 😅I think they make helicopters unlimited now

Ответить
@Tadamgiba162
@Tadamgiba162 - 07.06.2024 22:59

"The Chinese side is more developed than the Indian side. In China, we can see their good infrastructure, whereas on our side, there are no lights, no network, and no constructed roads."😢😢😢😢😢😢

Ответить
@Tadamgiba162
@Tadamgiba162 - 07.06.2024 22:54

Do visit arunachal ❤❤

Ответить
@sajidnayyar3392
@sajidnayyar3392 - 19.05.2024 07:15

It's part of China....China will get it like they get land in Galwan

Ответить
@rahuladduri6562
@rahuladduri6562 - 11.05.2024 07:53

using nature as weapon...hmmm intresting

Ответить
@samueldas66
@samueldas66 - 07.05.2024 16:18

China should forget about Arunachal Pradesh. The sooner they forget it's better for them, else they may lose Tibet.

Ответить
@dibashsapkota
@dibashsapkota - 06.05.2024 18:10

It is because that was the part of China long time ago!

Ответить
@qwertyyuio4266
@qwertyyuio4266 - 04.05.2024 16:49

Tawang is china they called it unlimited dash line... Do u understand?

Ответить
@user-kf7lk2oe2z
@user-kf7lk2oe2z - 30.04.2024 09:38

Chinese never lose its intrest in ladhak, Nepal, Bhutan, siikim and arunachal. As Mao said to them that these are the 5 fingers of Tibet...India should merge Nepal and Bhutan into Indian territory as soon as possible to stop this growing aggression...

Ответить
@Ri-ry2hk
@Ri-ry2hk - 28.04.2024 09:51

Such a clear and concise video with factual explanation only! You never disappoint!!

Ответить
@kavitaandy9361
@kavitaandy9361 - 18.04.2024 19:45

China are greedy and want to control Indias water supply so that it can create famines and kill India

Ответить
@ashokb257
@ashokb257 - 17.04.2024 10:57

Not only arunachal they want entire world under their control

Ответить
@sanatkumarpaul4917
@sanatkumarpaul4917 - 16.04.2024 09:32

Negative approach. Say INDIA IS ABLE TO PROTECT ITS BORDERS UNDER MODI JI.S REGIME. INDIA.S MIGHTY ARMY IS STRONG ENOUGH.

Ответить
@sanatkumarpaul4917
@sanatkumarpaul4917 - 16.04.2024 09:32

Negative approach. Say INDIA IS ABLE TO PROTECT ITS BORDERS UNDER MODI JI.S REGIME. INDIA.S MIGHTY ARMY IS STRONG ENOUGH.

Ответить
@sanatkumarpaul4917
@sanatkumarpaul4917 - 16.04.2024 09:32

Negative approach. Say INDIA IS ABLE TO PROTECT ITS BORDERS UNDER MODI JI.S REGIME. INDIA.S MIGHTY ARMY IS STRONG ENOUGH.

Ответить
@krishnakumarready9174
@krishnakumarready9174 - 15.04.2024 18:39

Why local people of arunachal did not object on encroaching

Ответить
@Spyron_
@Spyron_ - 14.04.2024 11:19

Its the power of money which will lead to development and all, and today or tomorrow but one day china will occupy many parts of this country slowly,coz of huge ammount of money they cal invest which india cant, how mch we try but we always fall behind china in the matter of money, infra support to a region, and if politician becomes corrupt then china can easily buy them, so its just a matter of time till then enjoy your freedom

Ответить
@followufollowme
@followufollowme - 13.04.2024 15:06

India cocking for WASP... again... 😢

Ответить
@kennySg101
@kennySg101 - 13.04.2024 11:07

So, the root of the issue is water?

Ответить
@frankm6218
@frankm6218 - 12.04.2024 16:10

It is traditional Tibetan land, nothing to do with either India or China. You have to be careful with what you say.

Ответить
@veildell6318
@veildell6318 - 12.04.2024 09:57

My grandparents lived in Dawang, I wish it is still china

Ответить
@aashkashah3
@aashkashah3 - 12.04.2024 08:33

This is just part of the story. Here is the full story:

India heavily is still under American/British control because Indians themselves are unable to protect their interest. Its mainly because of huge amount of Indians are with low morale.

So if China does not continue occupying India, America/britishers will and have already. China doesn’t have a choice because India is not capable of keeping itself out of British/American control.

India will definitely thrive under Chinese control compared to current American/British control. Plus they will not abuse locals like Americans do.

Ответить
@WeiZheng-oe2xg
@WeiZheng-oe2xg - 12.04.2024 04:47

The colonialism of the British was too evil and brought disaster to the people of Asia, and every Indian should be issued a British passport to apologize

Ответить
@e_valley2707
@e_valley2707 - 11.04.2024 19:53

One could also ask 'Why India is interested in Tawang ...'? Talk a bit about the China/India negotiations.

Ответить
@rahulpatil8523
@rahulpatil8523 - 11.04.2024 15:55

What are the plans of Bharata I would appreciate if you do a video on this❤ from Bharata

Ответить
@glories2276
@glories2276 - 11.04.2024 11:19

China is still a communist country !

Ответить
@Breathing_Clay
@Breathing_Clay - 11.04.2024 08:44

India will lose if a war breaks out again with China, im a Naga and an Indian by citizenship not by choice. Insurgency in our region will never end unless given approval of their demands, you dont know the struggles we go through every single day because of all this political developments. Unstable state governments has made our economy weaker than it should have been better, more factions (insurgents) means more government, Nagaland has at least 25 governments at present (including the PDA opposition less stste government) this means more taxes levied on the public. India's diplomatic policy is very unethical. We need better government at the centre.

Ответить
@jem77469
@jem77469 - 11.04.2024 04:05

Interesting. But isn't China's ultimate goal to gain access to the Indian Ocean via Bangladesh?

Ответить
@huanghermann5207
@huanghermann5207 - 11.04.2024 01:54

It is not a matter of interest. It is a matter of sovereignty. So your title is stupid. Why does not China express interest in New Delhi, instead of Tawang?

Ответить
@user-hx6pv6pq3s
@user-hx6pv6pq3s - 11.04.2024 00:44

Yunan Province is part of India. We all know that.

Ответить
@user-hx6pv6pq3s
@user-hx6pv6pq3s - 11.04.2024 00:43

The entire Yunan Province is historically part of India.

We have to redraw the map.

Ответить
@innocentmushi3036
@innocentmushi3036 - 10.04.2024 23:18

Those lands wat taken from China by Britain. And India see themselves as inherent of British Indian colony but China see themselves as victims of Britain Indian Colon.

Ответить
@leonesea32
@leonesea32 - 10.04.2024 20:01

China's tactics of modifying maps and names of places are actually VERY VERY EFFECTIVE. That is what they did to Tibet. Tibet has 3 major provinces (Kham, Amdo & Utsang). But after China annexed Tibet, they "updated" the map and removed 1 province (Amdo) from Tibet. Irony is that, now you're using that "updated" Chinese map for Tibet. In a way you are validating China's name/map changing tactics by using modified map of Tibet by China. After few years, people will use the "updated" map of Arunachal Pradesh with Chinese name as you did. Hence their tactic is very effective. As demonstrated by you

Ответить
@n2201
@n2201 - 10.04.2024 19:10

Why are Chinese occupying Galwan?

Ответить
@legacy-continue6152
@legacy-continue6152 - 10.04.2024 16:04

Iam from Arunachal and i love China

Ответить
@wongpohchan9485
@wongpohchan9485 - 10.04.2024 07:39

India and China, both ancient civilisations and have lived together in good neighbourliness for more than 3000 years, until the British took over India and tried to change the north-east border delineation. Doesn't that tell you something?

Ответить
@nareshgidwani3383
@nareshgidwani3383 - 09.04.2024 23:45

China is Neither interested I A P Or ladakh it is Fingering because Now it's Strength ill,Health Sick and Army Weak,Only to Show of A Mask

Ответить