I tested the $43,000 Camera-Phone!

Why didn't you mention the Nokia Lumia 1020 ??
If newer versions of this time machine continue to be released, many phone companies will close, and Canon and Sony will destroy their DSLR !!!

Leic"A" a lott"A". I could see the heart attach I would have the first time I dropped it...and Not"a" Leic"A" it.

Homie just casually man handling a 35mm Leica Summilux lens.

iPhone photos looked better

I have bonded S23 Ultra to my Canon 90d camera. It has multiple lenses. I will accept accept $5000. Bargain and very practical

People creating an extremly crazy and useless things)

If only Samsung continued the Samsung Galaxy Zoom line, who knows what kind of camera phone tech would have been incorporated.

why is the sound so wierd ???

Remember that time Samsung made a Mirrorless camera with a phone attached 😂

Samsung Galaxy NX

Great idea tbh, and would probably be a whole lot better in 2024

20MP APS-C Crop Sensor running on Android 4.2 lol

Entry level point & shoot camera's have even smaller sensors than 1 inch. The camera's that are shown while talking about "entry level point and shoot" are actually pretty expensive compact camera's with a fixed prime lens and a much bigger APS-C sensor.

Chinese spyware garbage

lol 😂

Thank You for your info. 😀 Happy 2024

what a garbage idea. 10months later, still trash.

Really this is one of those pieces of tech that might seem cool on paper but is completely awful in a practical setting. A phone is never going to replace a DSLR/Mirrorless camera, and it's not because of the sensors/image quality, it's because a touch screen based system solely dependent on menus is an utterly miserable experience. A Proper camera has dedicated buttons and scroll wheels for different modes, settings, iso, shutter speed, and aperture adjustments, meaning you can quickly make adjustments on the fly. Having to use your finger to dig through a bunch of menus would be slow and cumbersome and it would ruin the experience for most, even making the camera unusable in certain situations where speed is important.

Sure a company could make a camera based phone with extra buttons and scroll wheels and such, but is the extra weight, size, and cost, going to be worth it for such a niche, non existent, market? The people who are spending the money for dedicated, detachable, lenses, aren't using a phone for their photography, and I doubt they'd ever think twice about what they'd prefer to shoot with. On top of that, good glass costs money, hence why lenses are so expensive. Do people really think a photographer is going to buy into a lens ecosystem that attaches to a phone when they can literally spend that money on Sony, Nikon, Canon, Fujifilm, etc. instead?

In reality, the whole "Smart phones are replacing cameras" nonsense ends at the point and shoot cameras because ultimately the people using point and shoots aren't actual photographers. They're average joes who shoot solely in auto and aren't worried about ergonomics or the overall user experience. Smart phones replaced point and shoots for the same reason they replaced MP3 players, because they offered an identical experience in a singular package (Even then, a kodak EasyShare from 2009 is a more enjoyable shooting experience than a smartphone), but you'll never be able to replicate the experience of a DLSR or Mirrorless camera in a smartphone, the form factor makes it literally impossible.

Решение с камерой интересное, однако оно не пойдёт в массы и не будет популярным. Во-первых, нужно докупать объектив, а он явно очень дорогой. Во-вторых, потребитель стремится к простоте, а концепт идёт по пути усложнения, т.е. обычный человек хочет достать смартфон и быстро сделать снимок, пойматиь момент. Будет не удобно с собой отдельно таскать объектив, да ещё прикручивать его к телефону. На этот счёт лучше тогда купить нормальный полнокадровый фотоаппарат. Скорее всего, это просто концепт, создатели показывают свои возможности, а на массовые продажи расчёта нет, как и нет в них смысла.

With Leica M lenses being all manual, how does one focus this mounted on the phone? Is the lens set to fixed focus and then the focusing is done on the phone?

Wait ao they are just reinventing the camera. Thats kind of funny

Fesor

From what I know a small detail is not completely right. He says most lenses on phones are 20-25. I think there are more at 28 though

What does it mean if the Sensor size is 1/1.33"

the reason for an interchangeable lens camera is that you can change the lens for really good ones.
the lens determines the ammount and detail of the light falling on the sensor. a really good sensor sees bad images if the lens is bad.

Your outfit is utterly ridiculous

how on earth is this as expensive as a TOYOTA?

its better to buy dslr for 10,000$ 😀

If you have to spend this amount of money, to carry with you a camera lens(wich is the reason why you don't want to buy a separate camera), than is probably better to buy a DSLR camera that has the same price of you phone, and actually learn how to really use it.

Whatever Xiaomi do.. its always sucks almost

Is it just me or where all the photos worse then the apple photos, like he was not in focus in any of them

I dont know about you but I see an ergonomic issue with the Xiaomi: it looks like it needs a better gripping structure that compensates for the weight of the lens, like the Moment phone cases, which even have wrist straps

Ummmm, is this a joke? There is no auto focus

Its not worth 43k, they said it is worth that. They can say its worth anything. BUy a nikon z9.. problem solved. This thing is garbage and a marketing stunt. Can people not see this? and ohh wow.. f4... you can buy lenses that drop down to f1 lmao.

I genuinely thought he said Xiaomi did a stinky

the lens cost more than the phone. lol

The pocket-cameras you showed had all APSC-sized sensors, not 1“. Sony rx100 would have 1“, the Nikon Coolpix A, Ricoh Gr, and the X100 are APSC.

too bad that beautifying is default on such a powerful system

Begging for subs when you're quite rich is quite sad.

Smart phones will never replace mirrorless cameras. 😂

1 inch sensor has a crop factor of 3x. So, de facto this 35mm f1.4 in this phone is 105mm f4.2. Which isn't really that fast. I also assume that neither the lens nor the sensor has any form of stabilization, which means shaky footage, higher shutter speeds and more noise.
Honestly, I don't see the point of this, at all. We already had a fantastic 1/1.2 sensor on Nokia 808, paired with small, but very sharp lens, capable of resolving all 41mp on this sensor. Custom designed lens doesn't have to be big, just look at Ricoh GR that managed to put larger, apsc sized sensor, with a fixed retractable lens, and stabilization, in a small pocketable form factor.
As much as I appreciate the innovation, I think this is going the wrong direction.

Мне не нравится этот концепт с голым сенсором на задней панели. Если вы уже выпускаете и сенсор и объектив,так пусть он будет встроен объектив а соединяться с мобилой за счет контактов на корпуск или кабель Usb-c

Of course it's Xiaomi that's inovating here. Some of these top tier Android phones pushing the envelope with sensor size is really what it's all about. Sure "software" gets you a nice crunchy photo, but it's the hardware that will always deliver superior results... if it's in the hands of someone who knows what they are doing. Go Xiaomi!

Meta-lenses is the answer

Invention

how about i have a phone in my pocket and a DSLR can't beat that ---

I actually think this is a great idea. Carrying a small lens like that around with you is easy you could put that in your other pocket, but you cant do that with a proper camera you need a dedicated bag and they're heavy.