Why was the Harrier Retired

Why was the Harrier Retired

Military TV

2 года назад

95,596 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

Robert Cooper
Robert Cooper - 23.08.2023 13:19

Yeh so, why were they retired? This was a total waste of time.

Ответить
Nigel Turpin
Nigel Turpin - 12.08.2023 18:41

Where was the explanation then? An F35b costs about twelve times as much as a late period Harrier...how can it possibly be 12 times better? Mad amounts of money spent on the two carriers for the UK...what on earth are they actually for? Just enormous targets essentially...meanwhile we have a wide variety of social crises that require investment...

Ответить
Harry Cooke
Harry Cooke - 01.08.2023 22:11

America got it incredibly improved it and still has it 👏

Ответить
Deana Kennedy
Deana Kennedy - 13.07.2023 01:04

I also remember in the 1980's watching these at RAF Wyton near Huntingdon in Cambridgeshire, UK. The reconnaissance plane Cambera was the main aircraft at Wyton, other planes made numerous appearances.

Ответить
Deana Kennedy
Deana Kennedy - 13.07.2023 01:01

That would be the Ministry of Defense. Not Military of Defense.

Ответить
Caroline Byrne
Caroline Byrne - 20.06.2023 04:46

when on holiday and out pony trecking in the lake district cumbria uk a few years ago now one of these flew over head frightening the shite out of me however turpin my pony was unflafflable he just looked around at me as if to say for god sake get a grip mrs its only a effing plane

Ответить
Billy HW
Billy HW - 05.06.2023 08:49

The F-35B is going to be a worthy replacement.

Ответить
Jerry Esplanada
Jerry Esplanada - 07.05.2023 06:25

So WHY were the Harriers retired???

Ответить
Andrew Smith
Andrew Smith - 02.05.2023 00:10

A more balanced and complete account is had by considering that in 2010 the UK had a government led by Mr Cameron and Mr Clegg - each of whom was weak with no interest in UK national security. The Harriers they junked had just been upgraded at considerable cost and with no replacement we were at serious risk. The small carriers we had at that time were also decommissioned and newly upgraded maritime search aircraft were physically destroyed on the runway by mechanical diggers.

Ответить
Jose Escobedo
Jose Escobedo - 29.04.2023 00:37

It was a piece of junk😅

Ответить
Eugene Kaptur
Eugene Kaptur - 25.04.2023 05:16

WHY? POS!

Ответить
CORLEONE
CORLEONE - 24.04.2023 23:59

why why why???

Ответить
Terry Luckhurst
Terry Luckhurst - 24.04.2023 17:32

US Marine AV8B are continuing in service until 2029. This aircraft would be an ideal tactical close air to ground support for UKR far more effective at the front line than F16 and F-18 that need long hard standing runways. But as the US Marines found out in early service airmanship is not conventional and conversion training would be extensive.

Ответить
Mas Nanangnih
Mas Nanangnih - 24.04.2023 02:04

Send three squadron of it to Ukraine it gonna change the face of war quickly

Ответить
Christopher Carey
Christopher Carey - 21.04.2023 18:54

Sorry iconic have you forgotten how the Vulcan beat America air defences twice in the sixties? Also the lightening jet. Convenient you forgot those as iconic aircraft the Harrier was one of a few!

Ответить
gianni minicucci
gianni minicucci - 20.04.2023 00:03

good war plane for its time.

Ответить
Skelevon
Skelevon - 13.04.2023 15:47

They’re still being used what do you mean

Ответить
Steve Films
Steve Films - 12.04.2023 05:26

“The Harrier was the most iconic British fighter design”

The Spitfire: Are you sure about that?

Ответить
Hist 83
Hist 83 - 09.04.2023 22:38

Dumb it was retired, like the F-15, F-16, they traded old reliable, VTOL, for junk.

Ответить
James Gabriel
James Gabriel - 08.04.2023 02:26

Because cuts

Ответить
Expat Expat
Expat Expat - 06.04.2023 14:01

So, why was it retired?

Ответить
Graham Dawes
Graham Dawes - 30.03.2023 17:16

The harrier was got rid of because the US said so, we had to buy the F35 and pay them billions. What daddy says we have to do.

Ответить
kudakwashe mwalukanga
kudakwashe mwalukanga - 30.03.2023 04:03

has to do with crawling speed, very slow to speed is approximately 180km/ hr a pure kombi in the air!!

Ответить
Steve Hughes
Steve Hughes - 29.03.2023 06:44

The US Marines lost 1/3 of it's Harriers to Crashes. I seem to remember reading somewhere that about 50 percent of all harriers ever built crashed. That could be called Retirement.

Ответить
Andy McCaughtrie
Andy McCaughtrie - 26.03.2023 17:19

Does not explain “why”!

Ответить
Fermain Jackson
Fermain Jackson - 26.03.2023 04:16

It's still the best vstol aircraft ever built.
F-35s have still a long way to prove they are worthy

Ответить
Phil Christmas
Phil Christmas - 14.03.2023 21:14

That didn't explain much but the British knocked it out of the park with this design. It was very successful for many years. 🇺🇸🇬🇧

Ответить
Alto Saxx
Alto Saxx - 13.03.2023 22:25

Hi from the home of the Harrier, Wittering, we miss them all.😥

Ответить
Nine Dragons
Nine Dragons - 03.03.2023 12:57

So why were they retired?

Ответить
Hitler Cat
Hitler Cat - 23.02.2023 12:33

So they could sell the UK the F35 and makes loads of money

Ответить
Christian Mather
Christian Mather - 17.02.2023 02:36

They aren’t completely retired yet, the US still has 2 harrier squadrons

Ответить
Malcolm Bloor
Malcolm Bloor - 03.02.2023 19:56

If there was a conflict that fitted the original purpose of the Harrier, it is Ukraine. All available, F35,F16, A10 etc need concrete runways, all of which are targeted.

Ответить
Amit Kundu
Amit Kundu - 14.01.2023 08:15

Ya to f35 ka mukabla kr rha ha .wo be este saal phela technology aa gyi thi..

Ответить
Bear
Bear - 08.01.2023 08:59

It was retired due to costs. They’re retired 8 years earlier than expected. The government didn’t want to pay for their upkeep. Said it was save the taxpayer millions. They also got rid of HMS Ark Royal.

Ответить
Tyler Nichols
Tyler Nichols - 23.12.2022 01:17

Ohhhhhh, they fucked up the Argentine Air Force?!?!?!? OOooooOOOOeeeeeWWWiii!!!

Ответить
Making Stuff Awesome
Making Stuff Awesome - 22.12.2022 00:21

You did not answer the question "Why was the Harrier Retired" you just said that they did and sold them to the US.

Ответить
Bob Thorpe
Bob Thorpe - 20.12.2022 01:02

One of the few Aircraft sold to America.. Oh yeah forgot The Canberra The Hawk... The Viscount The BAC 1-11.

Ответить
JSauer21
JSauer21 - 05.12.2022 19:48

At the end of the day, attack helicopters can also take off vertically

Ответить
Rich  Hughes
Rich Hughes - 22.11.2022 20:02

It was old and had used all its options on upgrades without seriously changing the design..

Ответить
adamcrookedsmile
adamcrookedsmile - 27.08.2022 05:50

what's a kom-bat? Is it a type of bat?

Ответить
Aeronaut
Aeronaut - 24.08.2022 22:12

Q: Why was the Harrier retired?

A: To allow the money to be diverted into the F-35 and Queen Elizabeth Class aircraft carrier programs.

Ответить
G
G - 20.08.2022 09:57

Surprise surprise, Peter James Luff was a "Tory" party, the continual push for selling UK assets and national treasures.

Ответить
Elliot Cannon
Elliot Cannon - 19.08.2022 18:53

Light attack, heavy airshow.

Ответить
Nige H
Nige H - 18.08.2022 13:55

The two Queen Elizabeth carriers the Royal Navy now operates are very impressive ships but Britain’s role within NATO at sea was always based primarily on anti submarine warfare in the North Sea and the North Atlantic. For that role we didn’t need the QE class. Instead we could have invested in more smaller ships to fulfill the ASW role as well as also covering other roles in the North Sea and Atlantic.
Great as the new carriers are the Royal Navy is not suited to a worldwide role in the way the USN is, and the RN used to be when Britain had colonies worldwide.
It would have been better to retain the smaller carriers and their Harriers until new smaller carriers with F35s could have been built.
Britain is not a world power it is, and has been, for a long time a regional power best suited to defending Europe and the seas around it imo.

Ответить
KGB
KGB - 17.08.2022 14:12

I am surprised that the yak-38 was not mentioned?

Ответить
Samuel Cardenas
Samuel Cardenas - 17.08.2022 12:02

Retired what the fuck

Ответить
Icarus Falling
Icarus Falling - 17.08.2022 01:54

the british harriers shouldnt have been retired until the replacement was in hand. they scrapped them and we had no use for our carriers so they then scrapped them. its a bad habit to scrap a capability before the replacement is in hand. they got rid of the nimrods, harriers, tornados, list goes on

Ответить
Juan Lugo
Juan Lugo - 17.08.2022 01:30

Sub Sonic

Ответить
steve
steve - 16.08.2022 20:36

To answer the question, the reason why the UK decommissioned it's harriers and aircraft carriers was to free up money for the Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carriers.

The invincible class with harriers could of gone on until 2020.

Ответить