The Bridge Between Math and Quantum Field Theory

The Bridge Between Math and Quantum Field Theory

Quanta Magazine

3 года назад

143,012 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@enlongchiou
@enlongchiou - 26.08.2023 16:02

Electron, positron of QFT correspond with imaginary part , negative imaginary part of zero of zeta function through Sir Michael Atiyah's Todd function 137.036=g*m^2/k*e^2 unite QM with GR, produce me*(c/137.036)^2*A=k*e^2=ch/(2pi*137.036) : Dirac's quantum field, 1/(2pi*137.036)=0.001161409725 : anomalous electron magnetic moment of (g-2)/2 factor for QED.

Ответить
@depression_plusplus6120
@depression_plusplus6120 - 17.01.2023 10:43

It's all fun and interesting till you research and learn,

It's a nightmare when you're examined on it,💀


Hoping I pass this dreaded semester

Ответить
@Jermaine961
@Jermaine961 - 22.12.2022 15:32

What’s that opening piece of music?

Ответить
@RatusMax
@RatusMax - 10.06.2022 01:19

I am in my 30s and I am going to dust off the precalculus book and work my way back up. I think I can contribute to this bridge. I know some humans want to feel better than, smarter than, or look down on others. Competition. The problem is that only gets one so far before failing. The truth is I think everyone can do math. The problem is they haven't learned the universal language of math to express themselves due to the bad/non-existent ways they were taught. There are also other reasons outside the school as to why they did not build the connection to it. Unfortunately, instead of asking for help, they don't because they don't want to be laughed at for asking questions that everyone around them knows. They don't want to feel stupid or feel like they are burden wasting other's time asking the question. It is those flaw in the human that is stopping something amazing happening. The moment one thinks everybody can't do what they do, it is the moment they've lost the ability to make miracles happen in any field.

I've learned that when people tell me things contrary to what I feel is correct, I ask them to walk me through it like a software program. Then I can learn their point of view and see exactly why they disagree with me. I stopped making assumptions. When the source is right in front of me, I might as well ask for clarification.

I have one goal in life. Making a way to teach people how to learn anything. It's strange because on my quest, even though it's been ages since I've opened a math book after my lack luster college career, I am really understanding all of the math, computer science, physics, painting, drawing, etc. in a different way. I don't know what it is. I realize I didn't have a grasp of life when I was in college. I was just trying to follow the flow. Now that I've gotten out of the flow and went down a path nobody/few went, things are starting to look far different now.

Ответить
@Gringohuevon
@Gringohuevon - 21.05.2022 07:29

bullshit

Ответить
@lalitagedam3711
@lalitagedam3711 - 07.05.2022 21:28

I love maths 🙂 thank you sir 🙏

Ответить
@toooffuuu
@toooffuuu - 22.04.2022 21:40

Hey quantum friend I bridged this. Division isn't real. Never has been. Us falsey signifying that has been keeping savants from calculating to infinity (their god given right of mind) so that we feel weak and never love ourselves or equate to self

Significance

Is why

The quarks when observed

Act different

Than when not friend

❤️
🔥
👁️

Ответить
@sb_dunk
@sb_dunk - 27.12.2021 12:16

Has anyone noticed that nothing is actually said here?

Ответить
@schmetterling4477
@schmetterling4477 - 23.12.2021 05:43

??? QFT has been developed by thousands of physicists since the 1930s. How is this man "one of its architects"? That's a ridiculous label.

Ответить
@marcv2648
@marcv2648 - 08.08.2021 06:25

Theory of inflation, string theory? You sure you're going to really want to lay claim to that in the long run?

Ответить
@TomTom-rh5gk
@TomTom-rh5gk - 28.07.2021 03:03

Violin music does not make a theory correct. String theory has the same status as astrology. The theory is beautiful but is both contradictory and unprovable. Force caring particles are quantum particles but space isn't quantized. Space can't be quantized. Moreover, gravity isn't a force and it isn't a particle so it can't be quantized either. The video has nothing to do with physics. The video is nothing by physics double talk.

Ответить
@sitrakamatthieu
@sitrakamatthieu - 24.07.2021 21:41

nice !

Ответить
@requestnetwork
@requestnetwork - 15.07.2021 16:31

I really appreciate Quanta's articles which are in depth but frankly the videos are a bit disappointing. I mean it's great to listen to such smart people talking about what interests them, but I think the video could go in a bit depth to explain the subject matter too.

At the end of the video, I just remember a scientist talking without learning anything about Quantum Field theory.

Ответить
@Seekthetruth3000
@Seekthetruth3000 - 06.07.2021 00:17

4 out of 3 people do not understand basic math. Very sad.

Ответить
@silvayanik5828
@silvayanik5828 - 01.07.2021 20:20

I think that the fields are the key to understand both the the quantum theory, relativity and particles' behavior.

Ответить
@kamilziemian995
@kamilziemian995 - 01.07.2021 17:25

Quantum field theory is full of mathematical nonsense. Multiplication of various Schwartz-like distributions and unbounded operators treated as matrices in every possible equation are to much for me.

Ответить
@paulmaydaynight9925
@paulmaydaynight9925 - 01.07.2021 11:52

what "bridge"! Quantum Field Theory IS math Theory based on math theoretical assumptions erroneously called facts that just happen to give the answer you want

Ответить
@SportDubs
@SportDubs - 01.07.2021 05:23

I appreciate anything that is outside our regular 3 space dimensions with respect to time. I am truly sorry.

Ответить
@TomTom-rh5gk
@TomTom-rh5gk - 01.07.2021 02:20

Quantum gravity is BS. He is lying. Do not watch lies.

Ответить
@happyrogue7146
@happyrogue7146 - 30.06.2021 15:01

I must say i'm glad to see that even a genius like him bites his pen cover during thought process

Ответить
@divyadeepsingh9062
@divyadeepsingh9062 - 30.06.2021 09:38

Please make a video on dr kumar eswaran as he proved the 161 year old mathematical mystery of reinmann hypothesis

Ответить
@MrAlRats
@MrAlRats - 29.06.2021 23:12

When Newton and Leibniz invented Infinitesimal calculus, it wasn't very rigorous. It took nearly two centuries for the modern form of analysis to be developed.

Ответить
@shashikamanoj1160
@shashikamanoj1160 - 29.06.2021 08:31

Why is that fundamental structure(in sense of particle physics) mathematically intelligible? Is matter made out of matter ?

Ответить
@reneeharold7358
@reneeharold7358 - 29.06.2021 02:32

For people with dyscalcula
who have no chance of
getting better at math,
you can aquire scientific
information by going
into trances like gurus
in ancient India. Of
course you'll never
get a degree in science
but you can become an
artist and just have
science as a hobby.

Ответить
@frun
@frun - 28.06.2021 14:43

I believe causality is not completely understood.

Ответить
@keepthefaith9805
@keepthefaith9805 - 28.06.2021 13:34

Math is limited in that area,,,what is that bridge by the way?

Ответить
@hansvetter8653
@hansvetter8653 - 28.06.2021 10:49

"Language" do not and cannot explain anything! "Mathematics" is just a description tool for physics ... ! ... just describing, but NOT (!) explaining ... ! ...

Ответить
@NicoAssaf
@NicoAssaf - 28.06.2021 09:27

"Math and physics [are] this one intellectual structure that all of us would like to understand. And one day we'll understand that intellectual structure."

Fascinating thought right there, flirting with philosophy.

Ответить
@gert_kruger
@gert_kruger - 27.06.2021 23:23

Hilbert: "We must know, we will know".
Gödel: "Not necessarily".

Ответить
@leunam3434
@leunam3434 - 27.06.2021 23:20

What is the math behind the “field “?

Ответить
@mustang1912
@mustang1912 - 27.06.2021 22:28

It's all fake. In reality it's just ether.

Ответить
@vonBottorff
@vonBottorff - 27.06.2021 21:32

Reading Graham Farmelo's The Universe Speaks In Numbers about this sort of math-physics junction. Great insights for the curious layman.

Ответить
@illogicmath
@illogicmath - 27.06.2021 21:04

So what's the bridge?

Ответить
@bradleybohus4097
@bradleybohus4097 - 27.06.2021 15:44

The bridge between math and qft is rhythm

Ответить
@prithvirajdj
@prithvirajdj - 27.06.2021 15:40

Basically this video contains nothing.

Ответить
@cryptokami
@cryptokami - 27.06.2021 15:00

👁

Ответить
@chrishenry381
@chrishenry381 - 27.06.2021 06:32

Why are people chasing quantum anything when the point of the subject is everything is anything. How can you turn everything that can be anything at anytime time into a rigorous application for use or observation?

Ответить
@amphimixis
@amphimixis - 27.06.2021 05:46

What's the music at the beginning?

Ответить
@jacobvandijk6525
@jacobvandijk6525 - 27.06.2021 04:14

'***' WRONG TITLE (should be): "MATH = THE BRIDGE BETWEEN REALITY AND QFT"

Ответить
@chandankar5032
@chandankar5032 - 26.06.2021 17:42

Hey Quanta Team ,it would be great if you make some videos of recent advancememt in langlands program, Representation theory, Non commutative Algebra ,Number theory etc.

Ответить
@jinwooklee9262
@jinwooklee9262 - 26.06.2021 14:21

The miniature iran postsynaptically haunt because city consequently yell times a gorgeous motorboat. actually, kind conga

Ответить
@aniksamiurrahman6365
@aniksamiurrahman6365 - 26.06.2021 08:32

Quantum field theory - can explain every phenomenon of the universe, but can't explain what a field is, if it's just a math trick, or it has physical existence and if it has physical existence then what does that means for the real and physical world.

Ответить
@ableone8956
@ableone8956 - 26.06.2021 03:09

QFT is Universal Truth according to DMT.

Ответить
@davidwilkie9551
@davidwilkie9551 - 26.06.2021 02:29

So true

But when Euler established the continuous creation cause-effect of e-Pi-i Logarithmic Time, superimposed AM-FM Communication in this landscape Perspective containment, these states in Polar-Cartesian self-defining coordination with the zero-infinity field.., roots 1-0 probability of numberness density-intensity, ..the search for ultimate meaning ended.., now the interesting thing is bio-logical re-evolution existence of pure-math combinations and permutations, ..it's Quantum Chemistry wave-packaging configuration and formation in logarithmic spin-spiral condensation of real-time modulation probability. Ie infinite possibilities in a precisely known Mechanism. (Mythologies not welcome)

Ответить
@mikel4879
@mikel4879 - 25.06.2021 23:52

Square head, math can uselessly bridge anything as the logical associations ( = "math" ) can be made in an infinite different ways.
The fact that math can bridge "something to something" doesn't necessarily and absolutely mean that it can validate the truth of the real existence of something.

Ответить
@keithdow8327
@keithdow8327 - 25.06.2021 20:02

The most accurate calculation in quantum field theory uses a divergent integral and a series with a radius of convergence of zero. A fundamental tool in quantum field theory is the Feynman path integral. It is well known in mathematics that trying to put the Feynman path integral on a rigorous basis is a suicide mission. Physics is not math friendly.

Ответить
@aryamanmishra154
@aryamanmishra154 - 25.06.2021 19:48

Wow, getting Nathan Seiberg on this channel. This is the finest internet entity to get math & physics to the general public at a sophisticated level.

Ответить
@Hombolicious
@Hombolicious - 25.06.2021 17:02

Disagree with his last statement. What makes research exiciting is the utility we can derive from research. People dont' really care about information that isn't useful.

Ответить
@noumenon6923
@noumenon6923 - 25.06.2021 15:27

I think Einstein understood better the relationship between mathematics and physics, when he said,… “As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain; and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality.”

Ответить